I would like some consistency to the UI. Specifically, in the music app. Put the playback info back to the top of the window frame. It looks like it's placement was a tragic afterthought.
I would like some consistency to the UI. Specifically, in the music app. Put the playback info back to the top of the window frame. It looks like it's placement was a tragic afterthought.
Especially given most other apps have their controls on the top of the window.The music player placement on macOS is just nuts.
It makes zero functional sense.
I miss just being able to use my muscle memory without thinking about it. It’s been 4 months, and I’m still not used to it.
Sounds like a bad design to me.
These words from Kalsta above address a fundamental problem with Apple's approach to designing and introducing Liquid Glass. They're worth reading and thinking about. I particularly like "While Apple may talk the talk about this new design bringing ‘more focus to content’, that’s marketing BS IMHO."For me, Liquid Glass is a fundamental loss of focus—a brain fart from Apple, revealing that they’ve forgotten what makes a great UI and UX. A great UI doesn’t shout out, ‘HERE I AM! LOOK AT ME! LOOK AT ME!!!’ A great UI is happy to sit there quietly and help the user do whatever it is the user wants to do. While Apple may talk the talk about this new design bringing ‘more focus to content’, that’s marketing BS IMHO.
What would be even nicer if Safari, Music, and all other apps could have their respective and individual controls move along with the app throughout the display. For example, on a large display or monitor dragging Music to the right corner of the display with its controls moving the right. In this case I have more than one app on the display, each with its own controls placed at the top-center of each app.Especially given most other apps have their controls on the top of the window.
From Apple’s perspective, it’s another example of being overly efficient - taking iOS code and slapping it onto macOS.
This is the primary reason that I reverted to Sequoia.The music player placement on macOS is just nuts.
It makes zero functional sense.
This is such an interesting topic! Thank you for bringing it out.There has clearly been a lot of discussion surrounding Apple’s implementation of Liquid Glass on Mac (or in general), so I thought it would be interesting to talk about what changes, if any, users would want to see in the future - hopefully a more positive thread.
It’s a good opportunity to create mock-ups or share ideas.
Personally, I would like to see Apple replace the (weak) ‘tinted’ option with something that tones down a greater variety of Liquid Glass’s characteristics, including the drop shadows, removal of title bars/button backgrounds, and use of overlaying sidebars that can’t be hidden anyway.
If I recall correctly, in one of their WWDC videos they show different types of borders, and I think one of them was a “hard” border that wasn’t a shadow or a gradient, but rather a uniform translucent edge.Stop content areas scrolling into the window frame
However, I find that floating tab horrendous. And the position of the vertical bar.View attachment 2598643
View attachment 2598646 View attachment 2598651
Comparing two web browsers using the same "liquid glass" effect: Opera Developer is at the front, while Safari is at the back. The curvature of the corners should be more subtle; I believe Opera handles that curve much better. It also handles the "liquid glass" effect much better.
Wine is for the connoisseurs.However, I find that floating tab horrendous. And the position of the vertical bar.
What bugs are you seeing, specifically?Before "improving" Liquid Glass I would implore Apple to address the numerous bugs in Tahoe and iOS 26.