I was under the same impression. But from my experience this does not seem to be the case.
Ok. So I rest my finger for half a second and then press the Button.
-> Phone unlocks instantly.
I'm now first pressing the button and resting my finger on it.
-> Takes half a second longer to unlock.
I've not implemented this but i'm pretty sure it starts reading prior to pressing the home button.
This still provides security that any user is looking for.
I'm an Apple fan and I much prefer the iPhone implementation....
BUT
I would like to point out that you also have to wake the iPhone before using the scanner, making that part of the argument rather moot.
Except the button to wake, and the fingerprint sensor are the same on the iPhone.
Not really, that is probably the spot where my index finger rests when I hold my phone.
Thank you for the thousandth time.....
Not sure where in my OP did I say this wasn't true or that it took more than one step on the user side.
Thank you for the thousandth time.....
Not sure where in my OP did I say this wasn't true or that it took more than one step on the user side.
I just tried the same thing, resting my finger first, then pressing and removing after the press.
My iPhone didn't unlock.
Anyways - you guys continue to fire away. Ya'll are hilarious.
Apples flaw is that you need to wake the screen kinda with a push on the button. It should just unlock with your finger on there.
HTC never said they are matching Apple's finger print sensor feature.
This still provides security that any user is looking for.
I think this is sincere effort from HTC. At least they are not into cheating and into cheap marketing gimmicks like what Samsung does.
That is NOT the mindset for android phone companies. Half of their features don't even work right, but they make a nice long spec sheet...
I just tried the same thing, resting my finger first, then pressing and removing after the press.
My iPhone didn't unlock.
Anyways - you guys continue to fire away. Ya'll are hilarious.
Apple stuff just works!* That's why I love![]()
What are you implying? I never made any statements refuting what you've said. The author says its a problem that the device must be woken before fingerprint input can be read. I say "Apple's way is much better, but it too has to be awake to read the fingerprint input".
And somehow I'm "anal"? It's a simple observation. The author should be more detailed if he's going to write such a scathing review.
I know how it works. Check the sig - use it everyday and think its one of the greatest additions to the iPhone we've had.....doesn't mean I can't point out an error in the review.....
...the need to wake the phone from sleep before use....
Apples flaw is that you need to wake the screen kinda with a push on the button. It should just unlock with your finger on there.
Another crap Android ripoff. I'm surprised Samsung wasn't first to the show.
I simply mean that most of us here are looking at STEPS to be 'user steps' not 'operating system steps'.
user steps = 1
operating system steps = who knows unless we look at the code? more than 1.
Another crap Android ripoff. I'm surprised Samsung wasn't first to the show.