Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I guess you can forget getting a case for your HTC Max phone?

What a dumb place to put the sensor. It's like putting your car's ignition key in the trunk. Silly.
 
I was under the same impression. But from my experience this does not seem to be the case.

Ok. So I rest my finger for half a second and then press the Button.
-> Phone unlocks instantly.
I'm now first pressing the button and resting my finger on it.
-> Takes half a second longer to unlock.

I've not implemented this but i'm pretty sure it starts reading prior to pressing the home button.

I just tried the same thing, resting my finger first, then pressing and removing after the press.

My iPhone didn't unlock.

Anyways - you guys continue to fire away. Ya'll are hilarious.
 
This still provides security that any user is looking for.

But it misses on the convenience factor. TouchID is a good balance between security and convenience-- not as secure as a passcode, but way more convenient.

The HTC implementation is not nearly as convenient; it misses the balance and I doubt customers will actually use it. Much like Samsung's nifty "face unlock" feature that sounds cool but nobody ever uses.
 
I'm an Apple fan and I much prefer the iPhone implementation....

BUT

I would like to point out that you also have to wake the iPhone before using the scanner, making that part of the argument rather moot.

Except the button to wake, and the fingerprint sensor are the same on the iPhone.
 
Atrix had this type of fingerprint sensor. Apple didnt invent the wheel here guys, they just perfected it. The Apple fingerprint system is flat out awesome. I thought I wouldnt care for it when I got the phone, I was mistaken.
 
Thank you for the thousandth time.....

Not sure where in my OP did I say this wasn't true or that it took more than one step on the user side.

Well you said the point was moot. But when waking the phone and unlocking the phone occur all in one press, it clearly cannot be said to be the same situation.

As for being the thousandth person to tell you, sorry. I didn't really read the whole thread.
 
Apples flaw is that you need to wake the screen kinda with a push on the button. It should just unlock with your finger on there.
 
Thank you for the thousandth time.....

Not sure where in my OP did I say this wasn't true or that it took more than one step on the user side.

One step on the USER SIDE is ONE STEP. The HTC is more than one step to the USERS. Nobody here except for you was arguing about how the internals of iOS worked.
 
I just tried the same thing, resting my finger first, then pressing and removing after the press.

My iPhone didn't unlock.

Anyways - you guys continue to fire away. Ya'll are hilarious.

What should I tell you? This is how it works for me. (I've just tried it like 20 times)

Want a video? lol

EDIT: you still need to rest your finger after pressing the button. It's just way faster.
 
HTC never said they are matching Apple's finger print sensor feature.
This still provides security that any user is looking for.
I think this is sincere effort from HTC. At least they are not into cheating and into cheap marketing gimmicks like what Samsung does.

The implementation is awkward and certainly not convient. I would disable it (if that is possible) in the phone settings. The point of the finger print scanner is to make it more convient and provide security at the same time. Having to wake the phone and then make sure that you swipe your finger correctly on the back of the phone is going to get tiresome to use pretty quickly. HTC slapped this thing together in response to Apple and it shows. Not well thought out at all.
 
I just tried the same thing, resting my finger first, then pressing and removing after the press.

My iPhone didn't unlock.

Anyways - you guys continue to fire away. Ya'll are hilarious.

OMG!

Press the button, and continue to rest the finger in 'pressed state' there for like .1 seconds. Not very hard.

Got to wonder with some people.
 
I find it utterly amusing to watch people hold 5.9" "phones" to their ears. Look, I understand many Apple users want a larger screen, but 5.9" is pretty ridiculous IMHO.

That being said, watching someone trying to unlock their phone with this fingerprint sensor configuration and then holding said 5.9" phone to their face...even better.
 
What are you implying? I never made any statements refuting what you've said. The author says its a problem that the device must be woken before fingerprint input can be read. I say "Apple's way is much better, but it too has to be awake to read the fingerprint input".

And somehow I'm "anal"? It's a simple observation. The author should be more detailed if he's going to write such a scathing review.

I know how it works. Check the sig - use it everyday and think its one of the greatest additions to the iPhone we've had.....doesn't mean I can't point out an error in the review.....

I simply mean that most of us here are looking at STEPS to be 'user steps' not 'operating system steps'.

user steps = 1
operating system steps = who knows unless we look at the code? more than 1.
 
...the need to wake the phone from sleep before use....

In the 5S, the phone also needs to wake up from sleep before use.
Reviewers don't know jack. Of course is simpler/faster on the 5S because you just use the same home button if you want to wake from sleep.

Either way, different functions for the fingers doesn't sound like something I would like the sensor to do. I would have prefer security like w/ my 5S. Also, 4MP camera? That is very weak for 2013.
 
I dont think the fingerprint scanner is an issue, its the lower model CPU they are using. They are using the snapdragon 600 instead of the 800. I was looking forward to this until I saw that.
 
I simply mean that most of us here are looking at STEPS to be 'user steps' not 'operating system steps'.

user steps = 1
operating system steps = who knows unless we look at the code? more than 1.

It's the same amount of steps:
One click and one ID detection for each of the devices. You can even click the power button on the iPhone instead of clicking the home button and then put the finger on top of the sensor.
It's more comfortable/faster/better to do in the 5S, yes it is.
 
Another crap Android ripoff. I'm surprised Samsung wasn't first to the show.

With postings like these you'll just summon the usual android demons and they will tell you that Motorolas Atrix with Android hat a finger print scanner already in 2011. It's irrelevant that it miserably failed.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.