Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I can see their point, the 2013 HTC One M7 was an aluminum back with antenna lines. I remember so many people pointing that out when the iPhone 6 came out in 2014.


u8ohgX4.jpg


iphone-6-plus-vs-htc-one-m8-quick-look-aa-12-of-14-710x399.jpg
 
Newsflash! All new flagship smartphones are metal and glass rectangular plates of various sizes!

To be sure, though, they look hilariously similar from the back. Everyone is simultaneously migrating toward the same end.
 
  • Like
Reactions: navaira
I have the original HTC One M7, and yes, HTC simply followed the design language of that. It's just that the timing of the device's release came after Apple's. Remember that people nowadays only have roughly 6 seconds of attention span. Hoping them to remember the original HTC One is a lost cause.

But imo people are missing the biggest issue here
HTC's rebuttal comes after The Verge described the One A9 as "the most blatant and highest-profile iPhone ripoff since Samsung's original Galaxy S,"

This tells you that The Verge only has pretentious snobs that don't even know a thing about tech.
 
Apple copied HTC in terms of antenna design? Are they kidding themselves? Last time I checked, the iPhone 4 came out in 2010, which was the first phone to utilize a metal external frame as the antenna system, and similarly used plastic inserts for insulation.

Did everyone forget "antenna gate" already? Did everyone forgets HTCs response to antenna gate? They essentially called Apple morons for moving the antenna to the outside body of the phone, in contact with hands. NOW of course they copied the idea, and are even pretending to have invented the idea. Unbelievable.

Apples competitors are so desperate and shameless. They want to be Apple so bad, it's pathetic.
 
Didn't the iPhone 5 have a "uni-body metal-clad" design, with plastic bands at the top and bottom for antennas? And that came out in 2012.


Nope, the 5 and 5S only had some metal on the back; there were glass panels on the top and bottom. HTC One M7 was all metal. Also the bands of the 5 and 5S did not visibly wrap around the back like the original HTC One sported.
 
Lol. I'm shocked to see so many people trying to defend Apple.
Defend Apple over what? It was The Verge that called HTC's A9 a ripoff of the iPhone 6 not Apple. And since the iPod touch in 2012 was unibody aluminum what exactly is Apple ripping off? The antenna bands aren't the same (and many would argue HTC's aren't as ugly).

But the M9 is curved on the back.....
That's the problem. M7-M9 had a curved back. This A9 is now flat backed like iPhone 6. Plus they got rid of front facing boom sound speakers and added a Samsung like physical button for fingerprint scanning.
 
Look at this
iphone-6-vs-iphone-5s-vs-htc-one-m8-1.jpg


Or this:
iPhone-6-vs-iPhone-5s-vs-HTC-One-M8-21.jpg



It is clearly grounded on older apple designs.

I don't disagree. And what they did with the M9 is pretty shameful. Just that the antenna lines have such a specific look that it did look like the iPhone 6 copied them (for all we know Apple could have had that design in the works years prior and maybe not have much choice when making a full unibody phone).
 
I don't see why "relevance of the copied" matters so much in these discussions. Some of the most copied design elements in mobility came from Palm OS. Just because the Palm Pre didn't succeed doesn't mean that Apple and others didn't shamelessly use some of their interface ideas. They all borrow design cues from each other.

The same thing happened with TVs and consumers benefited. I certainly wouldn't want to live in a world where individual manufacturers held the rights to the remote control concept, flat screen form factor, or screen adjustment controls. They all converged, prices and margins went down, and you know what? We still have innovation and progress.
 
Looking at the '13 HTC One, he does have a point. I'm not saying Apple copied them, but they did have the antenna lines on the back way before the iPhone 6. They even had Beats before Apple too, haha.

I think it's fair to say that the 2013 HTC One was one of many points of insipration for Apple's iPhone 6 design, but that design was its own animal and did not immediately bring to mind a competing product the way this one does.

Put differently, it's perfectly reasonable for designers to learn from each other and to incorporate good ideas from others into their products. Indeed, we all want that or innovation would be uneven at best. There is a certain line, however, beyond which one product is plainly derivative of another. Reasonable people will disagree about precisely where that line should be drawn, but I would think most would agree that HTC stepped way over it in this case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Karma*Police
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.