Come on guys lets be honest here, thi iPhone 6/plus really looked like what htc has been doing and that was ok. The HTC One was a nice looking phone.
Apple copied us!..........so we copied their........copy?
I'm not. But they're all wrong.Lol. I'm shocked to see so many people trying to defend Apple.
being influenced is one thing, totally copying a competitor's product is another....Who really is 100% original these days with no influences from competitors? No one.
There's been a steady evolution of design across the entire iPhone product line.Didn't the iPhone 5 have a "uni-body metal-clad" design, with plastic bands at the top and bottom for antennas? And that came out in 2012.
They don't look very similar to me:Actually they did copy the Beatles Apple Label and the logo is similar.![]()
SO now there is a Samsung A9, a TSMC A9 and ....... an HTC A9 !And they coincidentally named it the A9...the same chip that's inside the iPhone 6s. No confusion there.
MR's poor information leads to part of your curiosity.I'm curious why the felt the need to change the design from the M7. That seems to be everyone's favorite design.
Why is HTC even responding to this? You'd think they'd have more important things to worry about.
/conveniently overlooks glass portioniPhone 5 was released on September 21, 2012, with aluminum back
![]()
MR's poor information leads to part of your curiosity.
"The One A9 is HTC's latest flagship Android smartphone..." - dead wrong.(come on MR, you're better than that) It's their mid-tier offering. Hence the price and the specs. The M series, and it's design, is still HTC's flagship. The A9's design was changed to differentiate mid-tier from flagship. That differentiation could have included a less iPhone like design, imo, but hey pretty much every industry borrows design cues from the front runner so why we think the tech industry would be any different is beyond me. They've all, Apple included, been "inspired" by each other at some point. It ain't gonna change.
I can see their point, the 2013 HTC One M7 was an aluminum back with antenna lines. I remember so many people pointing that out when the iPhone 6 came out in 2014.
![]()
![]()
... since they angered Apple users, which accounts for a substantial portion of the industry.l.
/conveniently overlooks glass portion![]()
Actually it was the iPhone 4 in 2010 that had the external antennas that sparked antenna gate.Didn't the iPhone 5 have a "uni-body metal-clad" design, with plastic bands at the top and bottom for antennas? And that came out in 2012.
Do you really find those phones similar ????
They don't even share the same shape !!!!
You seem to be either deliberately obstinate or incredibly obtuse. In that top picture, even the most ardent Apple fan should admit the design language of the back of those phones is most closely shared between the M7 and the iP6. Your bottom photo is basic deflection. Just like the iP6 shares similarities with the M7, the A9 shares similarities with the iP6. To deny either is silly.Look at this![]()
Or this:
![]()
It is clearly grounded on older apple designs.
The question about the antenna lines has nothing to do with the side. The design language being discussed is the back of the phone. That's where the comparisons are being made.The first phone with the antennas was the iPhone 4, do you remember?
![]()