Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So I doubt that Apple may work or investigate on such a project. I mean, forget about the iPod, iPhone, iPad or Apple Watch, entering the car business would be an even mightier and more spectacular step. And while saying this, letting cars drive around that really draw everyone's interest just don't seem match Apple's latest "doubling down on security" philosophy. Creating an electric car, probably no. Further developing on Car Play etc, I'm pretty sure. But who knows.
 
a few of those top rated comments on this thread are the best comments I have ever seen in Macrumors since I started browsing in 2008!
 
I'm just not getting this rumor. This is so far outside of apple's expertise and market direction that it really causes me to scratch my head,.

Look at the growing pains Tesla went through (and is still) because they have no dealership infrastructure and the regulations for years required this. I know times have changed in that endeavor, but selling cars is such a low profit margin high risk endeavor. It seems rather risky to even spend any money on the experiment.
 
this makes me go back to mr archives showing same exact comments about possibility of apple making an iphone back in '06



attachment.php
 
This rumour is garbage.

There is no way Apple would steer so far away from their core business, it's incredibly hard to make money in the car business and in the sort of profit margin Apple typically enjoy. Look how many car manufacturers have folded or been bought out in recent years. Tesla is losing money hand over fist and only a moron would consider buying them, I bet they go bankrupt in the next few years too.

The car driving around has also been analysed and intelligent consensus is that it's something to do with mapping.
 
I'm just not getting this rumor. This is so far outside of apple's expertise and market direction that it really causes me to scratch my head,.

Look at the growing pains Tesla went through (and is still) because they have no dealership infrastructure and the regulations for years required this. I know times have changed in that endeavor, but selling cars is such a low profit margin high risk endeavor. It seems rather risky to even spend any money on the experiment.

This sounds very interesting. I love the thought.
 
I imagine this rumor is true, but I doubt they're spending much money on it. Apple has so much money, they could conduct R & D on just about anything.



My guess is that Apple is hedging their bets when they realized Google was serious about their self driving car. The thing is, Google has been working on this for years now, and they've been very practical about trying to get self-driving slowly adopted by they 2020's. They're planning to license the tech to auto manufacturers who'll begin incorporating the technology in existing designs (according to Eric Schmidt in his book from a couple years back). The "Google Car" may never happen, and--additionally--they realize it will take time to get people to accept the new tech.



I think Apple has very little chance of ever bringing anything to production. Recently, innovation at Apple has meant buying awful "Beats," developing a laughably ugly and useless Apple watch, growing the iPhone into the super blandest thing possible, and making thin things even thinner. They're the new Microsoft. A giant, bloated, cash cow, living off their big accomplishments (latest of which, iPad, going on half a decade ago now). I'll be happy to see a bigger iPad, but that's about the extent of their innovation these days. No driverless cars for Apple.
 
If its anything like Safari for iOS this car will do nothing but crash for no apparent reason at all.
 
If its anything like Safari for iOS this car will do nothing but crash for no apparent reason at all.

You made me think of this:

For all of us who feel only the deepest love and affection for the way computers have enhanced our lives, read on. At a recent computer expo (COMDEX), Bill Gates reportedly compared the computer industry with the auto industry and stated, "If GM had kept up with technology like the computer industry has, we would all be driving $25.00 cars that got 1,000 miles to the gallon."
In response to Bill's comments, General Motors issued a press release stating: If GM had developed technology like Microsoft, we would all be driving cars with the following characteristics:

1. For no reason whatsoever, your car would crash twice a day.

2. Every time they repainted the lines in the road, you would have to buy a new car.

3. Occasionally your car would die on the freeway for no reason. You would have to pull to the side of the road, close all of the windows, shut off the car, restart it, and reopen the windows before you could continue.

For some reason you would simply accept this.

4. Occasionally, executing a maneuver such as a left turn would cause your car to shut down and refuse to restart, in which case you would have to reinstall the engine.

5. Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, was reliable, five times as fast and twice as easy to drive - but would run on only five percent of the roads.

6. The oil, water temperature, and alternator warning lights would all be replaced by a single "This Car Has Performed An Illegal Operation" warning light.

7. The airbag system would ask "Are you sure?" before deploying.

8. Occasionally, for no reason whatsoever, your car would lock you out and refuse to let you in until you simultaneously lifted the door handle, turned the key and grabbed hold of the radio antenna.

9. Every time a new car was introduced car buyers would have to learn how to drive all over again because none of the controls would operate in the same manner as the old car.

10. You'd have to press the "Start" button to turn the engine off."
 
Just be sure to hold off doing any Apple software updates, until you're safely parked, in your garage, at home.
 
[/COLOR] There is a good reason it is the only way they allowed to market their cars in the US.[/QUOTE]

No true. I spent 12 years working for Honda and Toyota. The reason the build vehicles here is to maximize their profits and protect themselves from swinging exchange rates and shipping costs and time delays.
 
I hope it's a false rumour. I would like them put more effort in their current products line. A faster refresh cycle for their products (mini, cinema display,..) and update their softwares. A few years back you would see annual refresh of iWorks and iLife, now they seems to let go a lot of things. It's too bad they are doing so good, they don't have any pressure to fix that.

:(
 
Look at Tesla, they started in 2003 and it took them 3 years to release the Tesla Roadster to the masses, but the Roadster wasn't that good and it took them until 2012 with the Model S to have something more serious to put on the road. That is 10 years that it took Tesla to release a decent, competitive and mass-appealing product.

Tesla is still far away from being "mass appealing". Outside of tech geeks and car enthusiasts people don't even know a Tesla if they see one. Last November Tesla was doing a demo ride at my workplace and coworkers asked me what type of car is parked outside. And because of the extremely high price why should people even care?
And didn't I read this week that tesla sold less than 35,000 models in 2014. Maybe that's good for an exotic but thats far from mass appealing. And I see more Porche Panamera's on the road than I do Tesla's; a car which is recognizable from the front and back.
 
This rumour is garbage.

There is no way Apple would steer so far away from their core business, it's incredibly hard to make money in the car business and in the sort of profit margin Apple typically enjoy. Look how many car manufacturers have folded or been bought out in recent years. Tesla is losing money hand over fist and only a moron would consider buying them, I bet they go bankrupt in the next few years too.

The car driving around has also been analysed and intelligent consensus is that it's something to do with mapping.

I would agree IF the only rumor we had was from BI. But WSJ and FT don't normally report garbage.

Marc Andreessen tweeted if Tesla can build car Apple certainly could if it wanted to. Heck, if Apple can spend $3B on a headphone company they can certainly spend a few billion researching electric cars and battery tech.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.