much cooler!
I only referenced the other one because Marc Newson designed it, if there is any truth to this rumour, perhaps he's spent his time fiddling with something more adventurous than watches ...
still think the chance of an iPhone is remote (if that's what you want to call it), I don't think that one will be released this year. Afterall, Apple are a computer company primarily, and have scored lots of points with the iPod, but I don't think it's in their interest to release a phone or intergrate one into an iPod.
I'm just not getting this rumor. This is so far outside of apple's expertise and market direction that it really causes me to scratch my head,.
Look at the growing pains Tesla went through (and is still) because they have no dealership infrastructure and the regulations for years required this. I know times have changed in that endeavor, but selling cars is such a low profit margin high risk endeavor. It seems rather risky to even spend any money on the experiment.
If its anything like Safari for iOS this car will do nothing but crash for no apparent reason at all.
For all of us who feel only the deepest love and affection for the way computers have enhanced our lives, read on. At a recent computer expo (COMDEX), Bill Gates reportedly compared the computer industry with the auto industry and stated, "If GM had kept up with technology like the computer industry has, we would all be driving $25.00 cars that got 1,000 miles to the gallon."
In response to Bill's comments, General Motors issued a press release stating: If GM had developed technology like Microsoft, we would all be driving cars with the following characteristics:
1. For no reason whatsoever, your car would crash twice a day.
2. Every time they repainted the lines in the road, you would have to buy a new car.
3. Occasionally your car would die on the freeway for no reason. You would have to pull to the side of the road, close all of the windows, shut off the car, restart it, and reopen the windows before you could continue.
For some reason you would simply accept this.
4. Occasionally, executing a maneuver such as a left turn would cause your car to shut down and refuse to restart, in which case you would have to reinstall the engine.
5. Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, was reliable, five times as fast and twice as easy to drive - but would run on only five percent of the roads.
6. The oil, water temperature, and alternator warning lights would all be replaced by a single "This Car Has Performed An Illegal Operation" warning light.
7. The airbag system would ask "Are you sure?" before deploying.
8. Occasionally, for no reason whatsoever, your car would lock you out and refuse to let you in until you simultaneously lifted the door handle, turned the key and grabbed hold of the radio antenna.
9. Every time a new car was introduced car buyers would have to learn how to drive all over again because none of the controls would operate in the same manner as the old car.
10. You'd have to press the "Start" button to turn the engine off."
Look at Tesla, they started in 2003 and it took them 3 years to release the Tesla Roadster to the masses, but the Roadster wasn't that good and it took them until 2012 with the Model S to have something more serious to put on the road. That is 10 years that it took Tesla to release a decent, competitive and mass-appealing product.
This rumour is garbage.
There is no way Apple would steer so far away from their core business, it's incredibly hard to make money in the car business and in the sort of profit margin Apple typically enjoy. Look how many car manufacturers have folded or been bought out in recent years. Tesla is losing money hand over fist and only a moron would consider buying them, I bet they go bankrupt in the next few years too.
The car driving around has also been analysed and intelligent consensus is that it's something to do with mapping.