Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
How do you know he isn’t just weeding out the lazy a$$e$ up front that will flee at the mention of hard work? Afterwards, he will treat those that stuck by his side with a lot more leniency but still require production?
1) I know people there (or who were there until yesterday anyway)
2) whole teams are gone
3) 90% or so of the whole company is gone
 
  • Like
Reactions: NightFlight
The people who stay will be people who think they'd have a hard time finding another job. People with impeccable credentials and abilities will have no trouble finding a new job.
Absolutely, so many opportunities out there for skilled people.
I just don't have respect for people who have no work ethics, especially if you are a man. Gotta have some drive, to fight and to conquer.

If you a women, 30+, I understand, you can have different life priorities. Families, kids and yourself are more important.
Blimey from what century did you appear? Sounds like the kind of employee Elon would love, although I'm sure he'd love a few more children of his own with his own employees ;)

I wouldn't work for/with anyone who measures my contribution in hours per week, it is such an antiquated old fashioned management style. Measure and reward on output instead of attendance...
 
Of all the things that this world needs desperately enough to ask people to sacrifice double their health and family life over, saving the butt of the richest man in the worlds latest ill-concieved luxury acquisition has to rank at the absolute bottom. Elon’s already loaded it with debt, all he’s got to do now is make it unsavable and let it fully run aground to make a credible defense to the SEC, and he’s in the clear.
 
Not allowing lying, misinformation, racism and threats of violence is not censorship.
Yes and No. It is censorship if you just don't like what people are saying because you believe differently. The issue with all of this is that Twitter could have saved itself before Musk ever took over. Twitter had employees that decided they would only enforce the rules as stated on the site for certain cases. That most certainly IS censorship. Notice I am not saying "free speech". I am saying Twitter had rules that they did not enforce or ignored because of their personal beliefs and/or political stance. The simple solution to avoid all of this was to apply the rules equally.

While it sucks for some of these employees to quit or be fired. I think it really comes down to are they able to do their job without putting personal beliefs in the way of the rules?
 
I am very proud to say I rarely work over 45 hours a week and have a life away from work. If I was doing silly hours like some, I wouldn’t be admitting it.
My hours spike up every so often on major releases, weeks when I’m trying to clear my desk before I go on vacation, or the rare times when there’s a major emergency that needs attention but those are fine, expected, were clear expectations when I took the job, and also I get paid extra for the time. If my employer told me I was suddenly expected to work 80 hrs/week or more, every week, even *with* the extra pay I’d get I’d quit. My job, while I enjoy it, is what pays for the rest of my life, not the other way around.
 
I’m hesitant to say this because it does seem like he’s destroying Twitter in some ways (which is fine with me), but at the same time… did a social media company really need 7,500 employees? I almost guarantee all “moderation” is handled by AI looking for offensive terms in reports and there were certainly less than 1000 tech people running the site, so seems like a lot of bloat.

Besides the verification faux pas, I don’t really see anything wrong with what he’s done so far. Sure he sounds like a terrible boss, but Steve Jobs would have been a nightmare to work for too despite delivering industry changing products.
Well it basically depends on if the Twitter moderation staff are employee's or 3rd party hired contractors because reporters like to stretch the true sometimes in that the actually number of employees a company has can also include 3rd party contractors. Twitter will have thousands of moderators around the world who are native speakers of the countries Twitter is used in. Now are these being classed as employee's or 3rd party contractors because if they are classed as 3rd party contractors then i agree with you that 7,500 employee's to run a social media company is a bit excissive.
 
Because once the pandemic hit, Twitter changed their policy to https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/twitter-employees-can-work-home-forever-ceo-says-n1205346. Twitter still ran fine with that policy. It's pretty crazy to suddenly give workers <12 hours notice that they're suddenly supposed to be in the office. I bet a lot of people relocated to somewhere not within commuting distance.

At my company where we did NOT like remote work before the pandemic, our company changed stances. Now many (most?) teams are ok with some to all remote workers. Office attendance is super low. Some managers and higher up moved out of the area, including my manager. We've hired ICs, management and upper management and they work remotely, from other states. It opened up the pool of applicants to lots of people who didn't want to move to the Bay Area for many reasons (e.g. super expensive here, high taxes, friends, family, etc.)

I live in the SF Bay Area. You do know how much it is to rent or buy a place here, right?

My manager lives 2,000+ miles away from me and I have no trouble staying in touch with him throughout the week, the idea that you physically need to be in the office for jobs that can be done from home is absurd. Some people work better in the office, and if they *want* to go in cool, but forcing people doing their jobs just fine into the office just because is absurd.

The people on this thread (and in general on MR) that hate other folks having the ability to work remotely just always seems like sour grapes to me. Like, to them, sorry you have to be miserable going into the office, but you should be advocating for not needing to go in, not advocating for the rest of the world to be miserable too.
 
Sorry but in Australia this is standard practice in the corporate space. Sure, work at a supermarket you and your manager both minute watch.
Work in a big bank or law firm you’re going to get pumped. That’s the deal. I know it’s the same in NY, Singapore etc.. something different where you are at?!
I’m sorry, are you claiming that being forced to work 80 hrs/week is standard practice in NY? If you are I’ll just note I’m from NYC, and you’re full of it. If I’m miss-reading my apologies
 
I wouldn't be surprised if Twitter is moved to Austin and is then mostly staffed by fellow tech bros (who fully drink the EM Kool-aid).
 
I bet the ones that stay, work hard and excel will get VERY RICH

I know - something hard to understand for those who are offended when it rains

And, who try to crap on everyone else’s success
I'm sure the Captain of the Titanic thought something similar...
 
  • Like
Reactions: solarmon
Of all the things that this world needs desperately enough to ask people to sacrifice double their health and family life over, saving the butt of the richest man in the worlds latest ill-concieved luxury acquisition has to rank at the absolute bottom. Elon’s already loaded it with debt, all he’s got to do now is make it unsavable and let it fully run aground to make a credible defense to the SEC, and he’s in the clear.

Twitter hasn’t been exactly profitable.
Let see if the next big shock is Twitter moving out of California.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jamezr
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.