I love how everyone who argues about this phone is out of its target audience 😂
Last edited by a moderator:
Well don't buy it then! LOL!the sensor doesn't even have sensor-shift optical image stabilization
I am so shocked, what are they actually selling with $599!? LOL![]()
iPhone 16e Lacks Sensor-Shift Optical Image Stabilization, Making It Less Effective In Reducing Camera Shake Compared To The iPhone 16 And iPhone 15
A closer look at the iPhone 16e camera reveals that the main sensor is a 48MP unit, but it lacks Apple’s sensor-shift optical image stabilization technologywccftech.com
Cause some the name of the website says Indian.😱And why exactly is that…?
Well, I just traded my iPhone 13 Pro Max in for a iPhone 16e and I can tell you first hand, the camera is great, better than my 13 Pro Max and as far as we can tell, just as good as my wife's 15 Pro Max.
Real life experience beats technical specifications every time.😊
I mean, you're talking about a phone with a true 5x optical zoom vs. a phone with a lesser sensor that has 2x "optical-quality" (i.e. decent-but-not-real-optical) zoom. 🤷♂️
For anybody that wants to see where those photos came from:
Flossy carter honest review is the best I have seen so far, especially you are parents buying phone for your kids ha ha
If you don’t agree with my opinions, let me know why you think Flossy carter is totally wrong too.
I never said he was totally wrong, I was just saying his zoom test was silly and irrelevant, comparing the 16e to the 15 Pro Max trying to read a small sign 30-40 yards away.
I also haven't disagreed with all of your opinions here.
Wow, the sensor size is very small, but despite that, the photos looks pretty good.With the iPhone 16e’s sensor area set at 100% (47.7mm²), here’s how the others compare:
- iPhone 16e:
- Area: 47.7mm².
- Percentage: 100%.
- iPhone 14:
- Area: 85.8mm².
- Percentage: (85.8 ÷ 47.7) × 100 ≈ 180%.
- Difference: 180% - 100% = 80% larger.
- iPhone 13 Pro:
- Area: 114.9mm².
- Percentage: (114.9 ÷ 47.7) × 100 ≈ 241%.
- Difference: 241% - 100% = 141% larger.
- iPhone 16 Pro Max:
- Area: 188.9mm².
- Percentage: (188.9 ÷ 47.7) × 100 ≈ 396%.
- Difference: 396% - 100% = 296% larger.
- Vivo X200 Pro:
- Area: 188.9mm².
- Percentage: (188.9 ÷ 47.7) × 100 ≈ 396%.
- Difference: 396% - 100% = 296% larger.
- Xiaomi 15 Ultra:
- Area: 271.9mm².
- Percentage: (271.9 ÷ 47.7) × 100 ≈ 570%.
- Difference: 570% - 100% = 470% larger.
Wow, the sensor size is very small, but despite that, the photos looks pretty good.
He is very entertaining and many of his reviews I agree with. He's much better than all of the usual suspects that are cringeworthy such as justine, supersaf, and all the rest.Flossy Carter isn't someone who is a reliable source, his channel is trash!
Dude, we get it. Don’t buy the phone.If this phone is $499, having this 2018 XR grade camera is totally fine. But is is around $650 with tax
If this phone is $499, having this 2018 XR grade camera is totally fine. But is is around $650 with tax
Dude, we get it. Don’t buy the phone.
Typing on my 16e 😃 It’s kind of funny now this one man crusade!He’s on a one man crusade to rid the world of the evil that is 16e
I’ll point out again, I’ve not seen one, not one person on these forums or others who have bought the phone to legitimately own and use themselves who doesn’t think it’s great.
Typing on my 16eIt’s kind of funny now this one man crusade!
I’ve been using the camera loads as you’ve seen in the other thread, and regardless of the sensor size the camera has been great. None issue! Love the 16e![]()
Thanks man! I wonder how long this thread will keep running lol. Haters gonna hate 😃🤣Agree, the camera is as good as anything anyone could ever need from a phone and your pictures look great![]()
Thanks man! I wonder how long this thread will keep running lol. Haters gonna hate![]()
Exactly. The proof is always in the pudding so to speak! Software is probably now the biggest factor in smartphone photography over hardware now.I could understand if they had bought the phone and it was terrible, but they’ve not bought it, not used it and is basing their whole argument on tech specs that are largely irrelevant.
So?With the iPhone 16e’s sensor area set at 100% (47.7mm²), here’s how the others compare:
Yeah because the flagship xiaomi having a 470% larger main sensor means it’s 4.7x better than the midrange 16e. That’s definitely how all metrics work. Surely noise performance is better period, but come on now.With the iPhone 16e’s sensor area set at 100% (47.7mm²), here’s how the others compare:
- iPhone 16e:
- Area: 47.7mm².
- Percentage: 100%.
- iPhone 14:
- Area: 85.8mm².
- Percentage: (85.8 ÷ 47.7) × 100 ≈ 180%.
- Difference: 180% - 100% = 80% larger.
- iPhone 13 Pro:
- Area: 114.9mm².
- Percentage: (114.9 ÷ 47.7) × 100 ≈ 241%.
- Difference: 241% - 100% = 141% larger.
- iPhone 16 Pro Max:
- Area: 188.9mm².
- Percentage: (188.9 ÷ 47.7) × 100 ≈ 396%.
- Difference: 396% - 100% = 296% larger.
- Vivo X200 Pro:
- Area: 188.9mm².
- Percentage: (188.9 ÷ 47.7) × 100 ≈ 396%.
- Difference: 396% - 100% = 296% larger.
- Xiaomi 15 Ultra:
- Area: 271.9mm².
- Percentage: (271.9 ÷ 47.7) × 100 ≈ 570%.
- Difference: 570% - 100% = 470% larger.