Since when iPod touch's are supposed to handle messages and phone calls without an internet connection?
Not everyone needs a data plan.
Didn't think that one through. But seriously why would you want a lte capable phone with no data plan? Or an iPhone for that matter unless you want a horrible crippled phone. When you don't have wi-fi...
Everyone's situation is different
This seems to work for you, so that is all that matters
For others, they have different needs
Choice is a good thing, and we should be grateful we have options
There you go. You answered your own question. If it doesn't matter in your monthly bills whether you get a subsidized phone or you bring your own, what does that tell you?How do you figure? If he was with that company for 2 years, not under contract, he would have paid the same amount monthly.
Just because the major carriers are expensive does not mean that you paid for the phone. That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. Yes, I could go to straight talk but would not have LTE
I get the feeling the OP is feeling the pinch financially and is a little bitter about it.
There you go. You answered your own question. If it doesn't matter in your monthly bills whether you get a subsidized phone or you bring your own, what does that tell you?
It's not a matter of ST/prepaid versus contracts, it's a matter of not being able to get the same deal for less money if you don't need them to supply you with a phone. Which appears to be the case with the major carriers in the US. What's ridiculous is being under the impression that those companies are handing out $700 devices for free. They don't - you pay for the phone in full.
----------
The OP simply has got a point. You don't buy a car every two years, you don't buy a sound system every two years, you don't buy a new laptop/PC every two years, you don't buy a TV set every two years, you don't buy a new fridge every two years, hell you don't even buy a new house phone every two years. But somehow, two years is a very long time when it comes to cellphones.
Cause: contracts that include subsidized phones
It's not a matter of ST/prepaid versus contracts, it's a matter of not being able to get the same deal for less money if you don't need them to supply you with a phone. Which appears to be the case with the major carriers in the US. What's ridiculous is being under the impression that those companies are handing out $700 devices for free. They don't - you pay for the phone in full.
And even if you don't get the phone you still pay the carrier for it if you stick with them, so yeah they basically are handing them out for free, they just require you to stick with them for 2 years if you take them up on the offer. You pay the same amount either way.
You claim we are wasting money when you paid $375 for a handheld computer that you use only as a flip phone? Prices for data may be high, but at least people want to use it, and pay for it.Right but here is what I pay:
$375 phone
$100 every 6 months for minutes
5 year cost = 375 + 10*100 = $1375
I've heard of people with contracts paying that much in 1 year.
Prior to the iPhone I had a $30 Nokia, which had better battery life. Back then my cost was even lower of course, but because I pay prepaid at 0.10 per minute it was no hardship to get the iPhone and therefore all the apps.
Tells me you don't understand the USA consumer position. Why are you railing on it, then?There you go. You answered your own question. If it doesn't matter in your monthly bills whether you get a subsidized phone or you bring your own, what does that tell you?
Please explain to me how though? If I pay $700 for an unlocked phone and stay with them for 2 years I have wasted money. If I pay $199 and stay with them for 2 years, I have saved that difference in price. No matter what phone I have if I want the same data and minutes, I would pay the same with the major carriers. You get unlimited mobile to mobile, so minutes are really irrelevant. Prepaid still have to pay for Data if you have a smart phone...that is not part of the "unlimited data" they list in the prepaid prices.
Tells me you don't understand the USA consumer position. Why are you railing on it, then?
My phone is the original iPhone and I've been using it for 4/5 years.
When I see people paying more money each year just to have the newest model it does seem pretty ludicrous to me. However, if you have a contract that warrants you a free upgrade then, of course, that's a no brainer.
Just my thoughts.
Both you and kramer must be residing in the US, or you would get this (no offense though guys). Okay, over here, with any carrier that sells phones, you have two choices. You either get a subsidized phone and a one or two year plan. Or, if you already own a phone, you get the same plan with the same bells and whistles for half the price or whatever per month. Because you don't have to pay for the phone. They'll just send you a SIM card and you can terminate the contract at any time with most companies.
If your carrier charges the same for the same plan with or without subsidized phone, then you take the phone of course. Because you're friggin paying for it.
Its not crippled. Just can't check Facebook, twitter, browse web etc. All that can be done when on wifi. It will be like using an iPod touch, but better, as you can call and text.
You may be right, I'm going on what I read on this forum.
Anyway, so with AT&T for example one can get a plan with all the features the subsidized plans have, but without a subsidized phone, with proportionally cheaper bills? So that one doesn't pay for a device that one doesn't want? If that's true then indeed I have misunderstood a couple of things.
And I'm not railing. I'm countering the free iphones misconception.
Yes that's the whole point of an iPhone. So to me that's crippling it.
Fine, but it is not a misconception here.You may be right, I'm going on what I read on this forum.
Anyway, so with AT&T for example one can get a plan with all the features the subsidized plans have, but without a subsidized phone, with proportionally cheaper bills? So that one doesn't pay for a device that one doesn't want? If that's true then indeed I have misunderstood a couple of things.
And I'm not railing. I'm countering the free iphones misconception.
You can use gps, calendar, memo, apps, games, etc you just can't update data without wifi. Not everyone need constant instant updates, they can wait an hour or two.
Gps uses data doesn't it?
Youre basically turning your smartphone into a dumb phone. What a waste.