I think the main thing is that you just may not understand Apple. While I'm not trying to make excuses for them, they obviously figured out the logistics to make it work to be one of the most valuable companies in the world.
So, basically the laptop is for all the professionals out there who are doing a number of things.
For instance, Apple touts that they created about 500,000 jobs by opening the App store and allowing programmers to develop for them. Apple knows these people love Macs, and their lives depend on them. Not only that, the time they spend on their Macs helps Apple make even more money... so they build a laptop that would work with professionals similar to that crowd.
Apple has never claimed to make laptop for 3D/CAD professionals. The market is simply too small. Yes, if better parts exist inside, I'm sure many of us would jump on it. However, the programming type above also care a lot about battery life and heat while they're sitting in coffee shops; so it comes back to building a laptop that works for the traveling crowd. If you need more computing power and a large screen, they have other products that fit those jobs.
So in the end, you can try to work with what you got, or figure out how to get what you need for your work. Apple won't change their ways if this is working fine for them; and right now it seems to be working very well for them.
Not necessarily. Every company does not cater to every demographic. Right or wrong that's how it is. Use the the companies that provide the solutions that you need.So all these companies like Dell, Lenovo, HP,Boxx etc that DO in fact have mobile workstation offerings are delusional and appealing to a delusional demographic....
"Professional" users are generally too busy doing their jobs to have time to write long nonsensical rants about things on the internet.
Isn't a "Workstation" GPU just a normal-a$$ GPU with a different bios and a Sh-tload of video RAM?
"Professional" users are generally too busy doing their jobs to have time to write long nonsensical rants about things on the internet.
tl;dr- Why would apple implement something that would increase cost and reduce production efficiency, only to cater to a niche market?
Not to mention, depending on what industry you target, niche is more likely to allow you to get away with charging a higher premium than not.Hey!
I love rants okay, to read them and to rant along. I make time to express all sides of myself it is part of communication, sometimes its vomit other times it has gold nuggets !
----------
What is this about niche market, do you even know what that means? Market place is there for EVERYONE to make the best out of and get the most out there to all the consumers. It is all valid market as long as you produce a good or service that people consider having in their lives. Niche is still a valid and successful market. Just because it does not have a popular top 40's following doesn't make it somehow less. Huge companies are always looking to meet the needs of niche producers because there are golden ideas and potentials there that need to be harnessed period!
Not to mention, depending on what industry you target, niche is more likely to allow you to get away with charging a higher premium than not.
Hey!
I love rants okay, to read them and to rant along. I make time to express all sides of myself it is part of communication, sometimes its vomit other times it has gold nuggets !
----------
What is this about niche market, do you even know what that means? Market place is there for EVERYONE to make the best out of and get the most out there to all the consumers. It is all valid market as long as you produce a good or service that people consider having in their lives. Niche is still a valid and successful market. Just because it does not have a popular top 40's following doesn't make it somehow less. Huge companies are always looking to meet the needs of niche producers because there are golden ideas and potentials there that need to be harnessed period!
tl;dr Apple No niche market. Apple everyday goods. pew pew.
What does this mean? Are you being racist with this sort of statement by chance?
what?
That entirely depends on the software you use and the workload but it is indeed more in the range of max 20-30% performance. Not something I'd call "like night and day" either.If you need to work on large projects efficiently, a workstation GPU makes a lot of difference. Of course not 2 vs 25fps like erigas here is trying to tell us, more likely 20-30% difference (although it might be lot higher if you have very complex scenes lots of wireframe rendering).
And vice versa. The difference was there 5 to 10 years ago maybe but nowadays these cards don't differ that much. In quite a lot of cases users don't even notice the difference (like with my users).AFAIK, its not true anymore. Workstation cards are just as capable for gaming now.
That entirely depends on the software you use and the workload but it is indeed more in the range of max 20-30% performance. Not something I'd call "like night and day" either.
And vice versa. The difference was there 5 to 10 years ago maybe but nowadays these cards don't differ that much. In quite a lot of cases users don't even notice the difference (like with my users).
I really wish you were right friend! I posted some benchmarks on the previous page between a mobile Geforce and the respective Quadro. It is unfortunately night and day in the pro applications side of things!!
Here's to hoping that the iris Pro 5200 will indeed be a a beefed up version just for Apple!! Its Solidworks benchmark is already better than the GT650 by 50% I think!!
The more I read about the m3800, the more I'm inclined to wait for it.
Here's some info on it: http://vimeo.com/71128540
And here's some info on the video card: http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-Quadro-K1100M.98901.0.html
I wish we had this package on OSX though...!
Here's some info on it: http://vimeo.com/71128540
And here's some info on the video card: http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-Quadro-K1100M.98901.0.html
I wish we had this package on OSX though...!
Ordinarily, people in your line of work have a powerful desktop setup at work, and at home.
You're going to need multiple screens that are twice as big as Apple's 15" screen.
So even if you had a macbook superPro which say hypothetically is $3500... you're going to end up at some at some stationary point connected to a power outlet AND multiple monitor(s).
It really sounds like you're complaining for the sake of complaining. Apple has a device called 'mac pro' which caters to extreme power users. Their mobile devices are not meant for such strenuous tasks, and this is not going to change.
If anything, even the Mac Pro is becoming less 'pro' and more every-user friendly with this year's update.
Ordinarily, people in your line of work have a powerful desktop setup at work, and at home.
You're going to need multiple screens that are twice as big as Apple's 15" screen.
So even if you had a macbook superPro which say hypothetically is $3500... you're going to end up at some at some stationary point connected to a power outlet AND multiple monitor(s).
It really sounds like you're complaining for the sake of complaining. Apple has a device called 'mac pro' which caters to extreme power users. Their mobile devices are not meant for such strenuous tasks, and this is not going to change.
If anything, even the Mac Pro is becoming less 'pro' and more every-user friendly with this year's update.
No, you could just use this "super mac" and wouldn't have to buy two machines. You could have dock with keyboard and mouse and "multiple" screens at work and home. + have a mobile solution
Make your work purchase the machine and that's it.