Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I find the Air takes 2-3 seconds to adjust for white balance.

I do love the screen. I would want this size screen in the regular Pro.

-
Straight out of the camera. This is a "large" export from Mac Photos. The only edit was to straighten it. (the full size file is 27.2mb and too large for MR)

Tarpon Springs Greek Orthodox Church - 1 (1).jpeg
 
-

I had my 16 Pro with me, to have ultra wide. All of you who don't use it are wrong, as wrong as traveling in the passing lane.

This RAW file has zero edits, my horizontal is spot on :cool:

-
Tarpon Springs Greek Orthodox Church 16 Pro 13mm lens - 1.jpeg
 
The big problem with the 13mm, which the 17 Pro did NOT fix, is that the lens is soft.

Here it is with some edits:

Tarpon Springs Greek Orthodox Church 16 Pro 13mm lens - 1 (1).jpeg
 
-

Two of the same night shot.

The dark one is me finger-exposing on the purple lights, the bright one is the phone choosing ..... whatever point it chooses.

The odd lens artifacts seem to be a thing with camera phones. I didn't have my 16 Pro with at the time to compare.

-
iPhone Air Tampa Riverwalk - 1.jpeg


iPhone Air Tampa Riverwalk - 2.jpeg
 
-

Overall the Air is good for 95% of shots. This Portrait mode shot was fairly dark in the restaurant, despite the brightness of the photo. No edits other than whatever the camera does with Portrait mode.

-

Screenshot 2025-10-19 at 7.23.39 PM.png


iPhone Air Columbia Restaurant - Portrait modejpeg.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: bevsb2
And then there is this, which is pretty awful:

View attachment 2569768

This is a great example of why I don't like random people taking pics of me, posed or otherwise.

THEY ALWAYS CUT SOMETHING OFF.

Of the four feet on these two people, only half of one is visible.

And why? Because the photo taker has no concept of framing. They just center the face on screen, paying NO ATTENTION TO THE CORNERS.

And look at, LITERALLY, all that head room, which is what the camera exposed for. Again, a victim of framing lol

And there's no getting past that idiotic, juvenile, color lighting. No camera handles that. The only way past that is using a dedicated flash head, at full power, to light the subject, and those require the use of a dSLR.


-
 
Last edited:
I’ve just gotten my new iPhone 17P and I’m pretty impressed with some of the pictures I’ve seen it capture. I’m going to start getting into photography, but I’m starting from “absolute scratch.”
 
I’ve just gotten my new iPhone 17P and I’m pretty impressed with some of the pictures I’ve seen it capture. I’m going to start getting into photography, but I’m starting from “absolute scratch.”
Understanding Exposure by Bryan Peterson

-
 
This is a great example of why I don't like random people taking pics of me, posed or otherwise.

THEY ALWAYS CUT SOMETHING OFF.

Of the four feet on these two people, only half of one is visible.

And why? Because the photo taker has no concept of framing. They just center the face on screen, paying NO ATTENTION TO THE CORNERS.

And look at, LITERALLY, all that head room, which is what the camera exposed for. Again, a victim of framing lol

And there's no getting past that idiotic, juvenile, color lighting. No camera handles that. The only way past that is using a dedicated flash head, at full power, to light the subject, and those require the use of a dSLR.


-
Relax man. This was just a picture to show what the "normal, everyday" person would accomplish when taking pics with their iPhone Air. This isn't a photography competition.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beanoir
Relax man. This was just a picture to show what the "normal, everyday" person would accomplish when taking pics with their iPhone Air. This isn't a photography competition.
I’m glad somebody set him straight, goodness the level of arrogance of some people is unbelievable.

These are mobiles at the end of the day, the quality of any photo they spit out is pretty poor compared a camera. But I don’t find the Air at all bad, when compared to my 15Pro - which also often took awful photos if lighting conditions were tricky. The limitations are still very evident.
 
the iPhone 16e also only has on camera and has its ups and downs as well but have heard it is a okay camera that gets the job done ✅
 
A single-lens set up has distinct advantages. No barrel distortion, chromatic aberration and edge softness. And it can handily compensate with AI and multi-frame fusion. To add, less power consumption and heat generation.

I encourage Apple to incorporate more AI into image processing and ignore critics.
 
No one has mentioned the Mrs.
OP is definitely batting above his average 😀

Hey keep OP's wife's name out ur mouth!

There are some slim mirrorless cameras that may be worth carrying around for these situations. For even better low light results without as much lens flare. I'm too lazy but maybe it's an option for other people.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.