Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iPhone Air I love the iPhone Air, but the camera is just bad
- Thread starter DMG35
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Curios to see the comparison with the 17PM picture you mentioned. Isn't the front camera exactly the same across the whole lineup though? Perhaps the lighting was just really bad for photos at this particular venue.... Also OP is playing waaay above the rim 🤣
Air owners are defending it like it is special, one said its the same as the Pro even
having tested both Air and 17 Pro, the 1x is the same.
I kept the Air for ergonomics and larger screen size and figured I would up my photography game lol. But foot zoom only gets you so far, literally ....
A strong reason for sending the 17P back was that it wasn't really any better than my 16 Pro, which I kept. The ultra-wide was still soft like the 16P.
Despite my camera usage I still use the screen more than the camera.
An Air Pro is needed.
-
Thank you, she’s amazing! love her ❤️
iPhone Air shots. Great portraits with just the one lens!
I’ve used both as well and the 1x and 2x shots are pretty much identical. The only departments the 17 Pro is obviously better in is the ultra wide and telephoto lenses.
1x iPhone Air and 17 Pro shots.
I'm also a 17 Pro Max user, but I find it to be quite normal.
I wish they'd go in the opposite direction and get rid of the camera bump.
It's the same as the 17, and only marginally different than the Pro. The problem is those trying to act like it's significantlly different; and when you're talking about standard photos and videos, it's not. I'm also not saying it's good, I'm just saying it's not like it's vastly different than the other models this year.
I know I'll probably be in the minority here, but I have no problem with my iPhone Air's camera. I'm coming from an iPhone 15 Pro and like the Air's base camera more. Granted, I only used the "base lens" and never used the "extra" zoom lenses on the iPhone 15 Pro --- I really disliked the zoom lenses and rarely used it. That said, to my eye at least, the pictures from my Air are a much nicer and "softer" blend of colors than with the Pro.
What does having only one lens have anything to do with lack of quality? Different focal lengths provide different perspectives, not improvement in quality.
Problem with the third picture is single color LED lights. Pretty much all Phone cameras have issue with them. Especially blue ones. It’s the way the color filters on the cameras don’t quite line up with the single frequency of light emitted them and then the camera trying to be smart and average the rgb colors (or lack there of)
And people haven't exactly been wowed by the iPhone's cameras over the past few years anyway. It's gotten a lot of criticism for various reasons
If you zoom into the right hand side of your dog’s face it’s really blurry and blown out.
Two things I thought of were:
1) Was the blue light blinking on and off, which would be typical of a dance floor.
2) Was the blue light actually ultraviolet, which could easily fool the exposure sensor.
If the blue light was blinking on and off, then the exposure sensor will be fooled because that light may have been off when the measurement was made. If it only turned on right before the capture, it would invalidate the measurement that was used to set shutter and aperture. Over-exposure of the blue-lit areas would be a likely result.
Coming from a 15 PM I'm finding the Air's camera to be totally acceptable for what it is. I haven't much missed the telephoto or ultra wide, but of course they would be nice options. For ME the trade for perhaps slightly worse photos is worth it for the form factor and hand/pocket feel. A good test for both was a sunset kickoff football game on Saturday. I thought it performed admirably beneath the stadium lights...
You realize the phone made you look like emojis right? Pretty sure the Pro's wouldn't do that...
Great questions.
1. The blue light was not blinking. It was just a stage light coming from the dance floor of the reception area.
2. Don't think it was ultraviolet but not sure on that one.
See to me I would say the 17 Pro photo looks significantly better to my naked eye. It looks sharper and more detailed than the Air does. Look at the floor boards and how you can see the individual wood planks much more clearly than you can in the Air shot.