Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

IBM at 90nm by Q4?

MacRumors

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
70,335
41,943
An Infoworld story from last week notes that IBM is actively working on 90nm chips and actually plans on shipping these chips before long:

IBM is currently sampling 90 nanometer chips using SOI, and plans to ship those chips in the fourth quarter, said Scott Sykes, an IBM spokesman.
Click to expand...

Current PowerPC 970s utilize a 130nm process. While no specific chips were referenced in the Infoworld article, a 90nm chip would bring higher clockspeeds and lower heat production.

Meanwhile, an unverified report that appeared on Page 2 claims to have more details, but also claims a later ship date for the 90nm chips.
 
Article Link
https://www.macrumors.com/2003/09/29/ibm-at-90nm-by-q4/
hopefully this will push PBs into G5-land way before the end of '04. Steve announced Desktop G5s at WWDC 03, maybe he'll announce the PowerBook G5 at WWDC 04?? Here's hoping
 
Hearing progress updates such as these warms my heart. Apple and IBM makes for a fatal combination for Apple's competitors. Go Apple! :D
 
Originally posted by Ambrose Chapel
hopefully this will push PBs into G5-land way before the end of '04. Steve announced Desktop G5s at WWDC 03, maybe he'll announce the PowerBook G5 at WWDC 04?? Here's hoping
Click to expand...

Yep, here's hoping we see them not only in PowerBooks but also in iMacs too by next summer.
 
Re: IBM at 90nm by Q4?

Originally posted by Macrumors
An Infoworld story from last week notes that IBM is actively working on 90nm chips and actually plans on shipping these chips before long:
Click to expand...

Looks like the year of the Powerbook is about to get a "leetle" bit longer :)
2003-2004.

Can you even imagine the astonishment (shock and awe) when a G5 Powerbook comes out and unix and wintel geeks start jumping ship to OSX? I cannot.

Rocketman
 
Originally posted by Ambrose Chapel
hopefully this will push PBs into G5-land way before the end of '04. Steve announced Desktop G5s at WWDC 03, maybe he'll announce the PowerBook G5 at WWDC 04?? Here's hoping
Click to expand...

Wouldn't get your hope up just yet. We still don't know what kind of heat the 90 nano process 970s give off.

This is according to the page 2 rumor:
An anonymous/unverified report claims that Apple has already been seeded sample 90nm PowerPC 970s this month. Reportedly, they run from 1.8GHz to 3.2GHz and heat production is significant improved, with a 2GHz at only 34W, down from 57W. The 3.2GHz chip reportedly at 71W.
Click to expand...
34W seems way high. At the same voltage, a 1.6 ghz 970 (90 nano) would give off 27W, too high for a laptop I presume. Of course, this is only a page 2 rumor so we don't want to read too much into it. And there are many other factors that come into play.

It struck me that a 2ghz 970 (130 nano) gives off 57W. Seems awfully high. Isn't that in the Pentium 4 range?
 
So what will ibm make at 90nm? A Power5? I think it is a little bit too optimistic to already speak of production 970's.

And the article is about 90nm in general. It said that intel does not use silicon on insulator (SOI). That is probably causing the heat. And AMD is not making a 90nm before Q2 2004. Surely those AMD fans are waiting fore those high clocked athlon FX's
 
Yay!

I look forward to my next powerbook purchase in a year or two :D Right now I'm still waiting for my 15 1.25 to arrive... weeeeeeee!!!!!
 
G5 Powerbook

I won't buy a G5 Powerbook until VirtualPC (if ever???) runs on a G5. And since dual G4s (e.g. @1.25Ghz) seem to be faster with MP-aware, non-G5-optimised programs than single G5s (e.g. @1.6Ghz), I am still hoping for something like a dual 1.33 Ghz 17'' Powerbook.
 
Xilinx ( a FPGA) vendor is all ready shipping FPGAs built upon 90nm design.
The chips are fabbed by IBM.
So a 90nm 970 in the near future sounds reasonable.
Normally for a CMOS design the power calculations (used to be ) are simple.
Basically power was linear with frequency and squared with voltage. But with the smaller geometeries, leakage current (power) has become a bigger factor. Early information for 90nm showed that the leakage current (power) was about half of the total.
So not all electrons are used to find aliens or fold a protein, a big part is used to heat the room :D

But, I'm sure IBM has some tricks up their sleeves ;)
 
good news

very good news indeed. I like rumors of aggressive G5 development. This seriously shows us how pathetic Moto has been and developing and extending the G4 for the Mac.
 
The article cited also reports that Motorola expects to ship 90nm microprocessors in Q4, meaning we might be seeing faster/cooler G4s in the same time-frame. IMO, these would seem more likely to find their way into PowerBooks then the G5 at this point. Not to burst anyone's bubble, but it may be too soon to hope for G5 Mac-everythings any time soon. If IBM comes up with faster/cooler G5s, they're almost certainly destined for Apple's high-end products.
 
Originally posted by dongmin
This is according to the page 2 rumor: 34W seems way high. At the same voltage, a 1.6 ghz 970 (90 nano) would give off 27W, too high for a laptop I presume. Of course, this is only a page 2 rumor so we don't want to read too much into it. And there are many other factors that come into play.
Click to expand...

If you ran a 2Ghz part at 1.6ghz without reducing the core voltage, then yes you get about 27 watts. But dropping the core voltage also drops the maximum speed while reducing power usage a lot more. If you reduce the core voltage as well, then you could shed another 8 watts down to 19w. Probably still a little high compared to the 7457 though.

It struck me that a 2ghz 970 (130 nano) gives off 57W. Seems awfully high. Isn't that in the Pentium 4 range?
Click to expand...

If you compare to a 2 Ghz P4, then I think you are seeing similar power usage (the primary factor in power usage is relative to the transistor count and size, and I wouldn't be surprised if the 970 & P4 had a similar transistor count). But of course, a 2Ghz 970 absolutely smokes a 2Ghz P4 so I don't think the comparison is particularly fair :D.
 
Man, it would suck if a G5 PowerBook were to come out after finally getting a new 15"! Ah well, I love this to death and don't need a G5 anyway. I wonder what they will look like, though. :)
 
So correct me if I am wrong;)

These new chip are ready THIS YEAR!? and will be shipped THIS YEAR!? so we could see these new chips in new powemacs??? aswel as powerbooks???

I am going to buy a dual G5 this week, but now with this new info should I hold off for these new G5 chips?????

And if these chips get into new powermacs when do you think they will see the light of day?
 
Another argument against G5 PBs any time soon: Apple has never jumped processor families in their portables without changing the form factor. The current 12 and 17 inch PBs form factors are less then one year old, and the 15 inch is brand new. By necessity and/or marketing, a G5 PB will have a new form factor -- and it's just too early in the product cycle for this to happen within the next 3-6 months.

My most optimistic guess for a G5 PB: next summer. Potentially, the G5 could creep into the consumer line (iMac) by the end of next year, but I'd call that very doubtful.
 
Okay.. can someone shed a little bit of light.... in not that savy on processor sizes..

So if I understand correctly.. a 130 nm processor is for desktop and 90 nm is for portables?

But then some mention that the 90 nm may find their way into powermac G5s.

Raman
 
Originally posted by Raman1970
Okay.. can someone shed a little bit of light.... in not that savy on processor sizes..

So if I understand correctly.. a 130 nm processor is for desktop and 90 nm is for portables?

But then some mention that the 90 nm may find their way into powermac G5s.

Raman
Click to expand...

Process size has no direct influence on what targets the chip is used for, insofar as a smaller process can certainly be used for the same tasks as a larger process. The advantages of a smaller process are less power, heat and a smaller package. Those advantages do tend to allow you to use chips in places they weren't usable in before.
 
It isn't clear whether the IBM spokesman meant Q4 actual or financial year... if it was the financial year, that would put it around the Q2 2004 / summer 3Ghz timeframe.

Although a nice speed bump for San Francisco would be nice... if the current 2Ghz is running around 50W, and the new 3.2Ghz will run at 70W, then there is probably some room for bumping the current generation of G5s...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back