This must be also mean wireless synch since a 'data exchange' relationship has been established between iTunes and your wireless touch device.
However, let's look at the cold hard facts ;
Apple's turnover this year will hit over $30billion by selling 40m ipods, 10m iphones and 10 million macs.
Microsoft are on track for $60 billion selling 92% of the worlds operating systems and office software. That's half of Microsoft's T/O!.
If Apple sell 40m ipods, 40m iphones and just 20m macs they will eclipse Microsoft's turnover and socially relegate them to 'has-been'.
So, they don't need to license the technology - their current momentum and roadmap will accomplish this already. Licensing will only dilute their own excellence by letting confusion muddy who and what Apple create.
This is why Microsoft are crapping themselves - you see Microsoft has NEVER experienced true competition - NEVER EVER!
Apple, (duh - John 'I gave it all to Microsoft' Sculley) 'kicked' Steve Jobs out of the door before this thing ever got started. The Apple of the nineties was NOT competition.
This is the decade when we have truly seen what Apple and Steve Jobs can accomplish and the results are nothing short of staggering.
What's more - it's only just begun....
Because if your iPhone can do it, a device you'll probably have with you anyway, you don't need to carry another device.
What was the point in my buying the iPhone when I already had a phone and an iPod?![]()
Silly argument. MS sell software, not hardware so their production costs are negligible compared to Apple's even taking the reduced costs Apple incur by manufacturing their goods in low wage economies. Apple's profit for the quarter was just over $1 billion. Microsoft's was $4.4 billion.
Provided:
a) They do - the numbers you're quoting here, with the exception of the iPod, are ludicrous. What research have you done to suggest this? What time-scale are we talking about?
b) Microsoft stand still which is unlikely. Again you don't quote a time-scale so it's difficult to draw a comparison here.
And if it rains gold tomorrow we'll all be rich.
Except during the 70's and 80's when they were in competition with other OS makers including apple. And beat them. Incidentally, I'd also point out that most of Apple's revenue is hardware dependent whilst most of MS's is software which isn't really the same market.
Yes it was. Just not very good competition. Incidentally I'd point out that Steve Jobs was there in the 80's when MS were kicking the crap out of Apple.
You think? They're very good but sustainable long term? Not without a major market strategy shift.
I strongly suggest you read up on economics, target markets, product diversification and pricing. It'll give you some much needed perspective.
HiRez said:That's fine, but it sounds like you still need a computer to be on. They should enable the iPhone to steam via AirTunes directly from the iPhone's music library.
Wow - do you have greyscale contact lenses in - what a bleak world view you have!!
1) Apple VS MS profit - When Apple doubles output it's profit will be (staying as is) $2.5 billion - but assuming the scale of economies leverages some more profit advantage I expect we could see $3billion - so close enough without being greedy right ?
2) Numbers - ludicrous ? Are you kidding ? they already sell 40M ipods
they already sell 10 million macs
they are already going to sell 10m iphones
so shifting from 2.5m macs a quarter to 5m when the market is 170m Personal computers is not exactly going to be difficult.
The 'move to mac' momentum is there - for the first time there IS a credible alternative to Microsoft - this has never happened before.
on Iphone even Gartner are predicting 45m iphones in 2009 which out of a 1 billion handset market is not exactly 'ludicrous' either.
3) 70's ? Huh - Apple I & II was the only computer - there was no Microsoft to speak of. Only geeks and nerds bought computers but Apple were number one in that small beginning.
Microsoft were part of the Apple family - until they performed a glorious back-stab and stole the OS and ran away with the Office package they'd been commissioned to create for Mac. Jobs was out by '85 and the demise is, shall we say, history
4) Mmmh competition ? well, even upto 1997 Apple were still sailing on the steam generated from the original '85 mac - hardly call that competition. Leaderless and visionless with stagnant products.
5) Sustainable ? What's not sustainable ?
that's like saying 'wheat markets' are not sustainable...
So, a company with 5-8% market-share that is single-handedly creating a portable 'iTouch' communicator revolution is not sustainable?
Your kidding right? How about 5% down 95% to go - What can Microsoft hope to win ?
certainly not any more market share - all they can do is desperately fight to retain current ground.
If anything is not sustainable it's Vista and the 'big ass table' they have envisioned for our futures...
I think you've assumed that I think Apple have to 'get it all' like Microsoft did - no Apple will be happy to take another 10 or 20% market share and leave the budget/junk/crap phone & PC mess' to the rest
Simplify Media have had this cracked for a while - but the iPhone / iTouch need to be jail-broken.
http://www.simplifymedia.com/lab.html
Jim
Wow - do you have greyscale contact lenses in - what a bleak world view you have!!
1) Apple VS MS profit - When Apple doubles output it's profit will be (staying as is) $2.5 billion - but assuming the scale of economies leverages some more profit advantage I expect we could see $3billion - so close enough without being greedy right ?
2) Numbers - ludicrous ? Are you kidding ? they already sell 40M ipods, they already sell 10 million macs, they are already going to sell 10m iphones - so shifting from 2.5m macs a quarter to 5m when the market is 170m Personal computers is not exactly going to be difficult. The 'move to mac' momentum is there - for the first time there IS a credible alternative to Microsoft - this has never happened before. on Iphone even Gartner are predicting 45m iphones in 2009 which out of a 1 billion handset market is not exactly 'ludicrous' either.
3) 70's ? Huh - Apple I & II was the only computer - there was no Microsoft to speak of. Only geeks and nerds bought computers but Apple were number one in that small beginning. Microsoft were part of the Apple family - until they performed a glorious back-stab and stole the OS and ran away with the Office package they'd been commissioned to create for Mac. Jobs was out by '85 and the demise is, shall we say, history
4) Mmmh competition ? well, even upto 1997 Apple were still sailing on the steam generated from the original '85 mac - hardly call that competition. Leaderless and visionless with stagnant products.
5) Sustainable ? What's not sustainable ? that's like saying 'wheat markets' are not sustainable...So, a company with 5-8% market-share that is single-handedly creating a portable 'iTouch' communicator revolution is not sustainable? Your kidding right? How about 5% down 95% to go - What can Microsoft hope to win ? certainly not any more market share - all they can do is desperately fight to retain current ground. If anything is not sustainable it's Vista and the 'big ass table' they have envisioned for our futures...
I think you've assumed that I think Apple have to 'get it all' like Microsoft did - no Apple will be happy to take another 10 or 20% market share and leave the budget/junk/crap phone & PC mess' to the rest
If you review Bongo's post history since joining in 2008, not too difficult to conclude that he works for a corporation like Nokia or a network provider which doesn't offer iPhone. Well informed, has all the industry sales figures, and doesn't have much good to say about any Apple products. Might even work for one of the paid-to-post spin shops like Dvorak or Enderle. Just be aware.
Your tinfoil hat's fallen off again.
If you review Bongo's post history since joining in 2008, not too difficult to conclude that he works for a corporation like Nokia or a network provider which doesn't offer iPhone. Well informed, has all the industry sales figures, and doesn't have much good to say about any Apple products. Might even work for one of the paid-to-post spin shops like Dvorak or Enderle. Just be aware.
TUAW claims that they've heard that Apple is working on a new iPhone application called "iControl" which will allow the iPhone to control and stream media from local iTunes libraries
Thanks mccldwll - I took a look and he is constantly down on Apple and up on MS and Nokia - seems to be desperately trying to convert the happy into the sad...not much of a noble calling really...on those grounds I'd say Microsoft employee...
Sorry, not sure how you gather that. I have a pretty good world view, it just happens to be a realistic one and, since I invest in both Apple and Microsoft amongst other companies, it helps to have a good idea of each company's market and potential.
Yes, but that brings us back to the "when Apple doubles its output" part.
Yeah I mentioned that.
Actually, they don't at the moment. They should do this year but then it's a huge leap from 10 million to 20 million given Apple's market segmentation.
They might sell 10 million iPhones in calender year 2008. this depends on:
a) Release to new markets to improve sales opportunities
b) Release of new models
Of course, counting numbers from b) together with sales of v1.0 iPhones is a bit dubious - Nokia will not add N96 sales volumes to N95 sales volumes for example - but I suppose Steve and co were talking about market penetration so I'll let them off here.
So, yeah, they might. We'll see.
This assumption depends on constant high growth. I don't think this will be the case and expect momentum to start flattening. Sure, they'll grow maybe to, say, 15 million Mac sales a year. After that it's hard to see where sales will come from given the current business model.
This is true.
Given that Gene Munster is probably the biggest Apple bear out there, I don't think the word 'even' is appropriate here. Apple may very well see high volumes of the iPhone but they're going to have to vary the product line and pricing - in much the same way as they did for the iPod - to do it which will in turn eat into revenue and profit.
Partially true. The market for personal computers was restricted to the technically aware up until, say, about 1976 - which incidentally was when Apple started - after that the likes of the Commodore PET and the TRS 80 appeared so to say the Apple I and II were the only computers available is incorrect. I'd also point out that it was the TRS 80 that dominated sales, not the Apple II so Apple weren't number one at this point.
Of course you're right about MS - they didn't really get going until the 80's. Confusing software and hardware again. sorry.
Mind you, once they did get going it was all over bar the shouting.
Nonsense. Microsoft started up about 1978 and their first big break was developing DOS for IBM. To suggest they were part of the Apple family is totally, totally wrong. Where did you get this nonsense from?
But still competition. Like I said, just not very good competition. You can't rule a company out of a market just because they're going through a fallow patch because your entire argument depends on Microsoft having a fallow patch.
Pricing, lock in and suitability of purpose mainly.
No it isn't. You're comparing a food staple to luxury goods.
I think you misunderstand - I said their growth rate isn't sustainable. Apple will continue to do well but will hit a ceiling. As for portable communicators, hardly a revolution, is it? They've been out for years and Apple will have to fight very, very hard to establish themselves in this global market.
Don't confuse a nice UI and browser with a revolutionary device. Portable communicators are already a well worn path.
Well, since they control the market they can't. Apple will continue to nibble away at MS's market share but that's what it'll be - nibbling, not huge bites.
Desperate? Over a couple of percentage points?
Hardly.
Vista is just the latest iteration of Windows. Windows is most definitely sustainable.
I don't think there is a 10% or 20% extra market that doesn't involve lower price products. I think that once you get to 15% you've already hit that ceiling.
And this assumes that people will ignore the other high quality products that other manufacturers offer which, naturally, they won't.
Like I said, my world-view is fine, it's just tempered with realism.
I agree - The iphone/ipod touch like devices are the future of computing. having said that, I wonder if apple will open up the iphone or at least its apps to other device manufactures?
That may sound crazy, but didn't apple lose the computer OS wars to windows by not licensing the apple OS back when it still had a chance?
Eventually other manufactures are going to come up with a shared nearly adequate alternative to the itouch/iphone interface, and through cut throat competition with each other they will eventually produce devices at half of apples equivalent retail price and apple will start to lose its potential market share and once again become a niche player rather than the markets dominant force.
Or more recently, soon after Bongo's appearance:
"Nokia to bring Microsoft Silverlight powered experiences to millions of mobile users
March 04, 2008
Extends choice for developers on the world's leading mobile platforms
Espoo, Finland - Nokia today announced plans to make Microsoft Silverlight available for S60 on Symbian OS, the world's leading smartphone software(1), as well as for Series 40 devices and Nokia Internet tablets. Adding support for Silverlight will extend opportunities for developers to create rich, interactive applications that run on multiple platforms in a consistent and reliable way."
So would it stream from your iTunes library to your iPhone? Or would you use the iPhone as a remote control for iTunes to play music on your Mac and over AirTunes?
If the latter, then it sounds like Salling Clicker, which I use every day on my N95. The absence of a Salling Clicker-like application for the iPhone has so far been one of the several reasons I'm staying with Nokia for now.
So this is good news... hope it's true.
SL