Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

If you ordered the 15" Hi-Res, which screen did you get?

  • I bought the 15" Hi-Res Glossy

    Votes: 97 46.9%
  • I bought the 15" Hi-Res Anti-Glare

    Votes: 110 53.1%

  • Total voters
    207
  • Poll closed .
Yes, the price is an issue, and Apple should offer them at similar prices. But when you're paying so much for a computer and you want a matte display, obviously Anti Glare is the only option on a MBP.

It's not a waste of money for someone that wants a certain type of display on a laptop they plan to use a lot over the next few years or more.

The resolution is the same btw, so doesn't suck. Looks great actually.
It is not the same: taken from apple.com
The 15-inch MacBook Pro comes with a 1440-by-900-pixel LED-backlit glossy display. You can also choose a high-resolution 1680-by-1050 glossy or antiglare display that gives you 36 percent more pixels.
Text is smaller
 
It is not the same: taken from apple.com
The 15-inch MacBook Pro comes with a 1440-by-900-pixel LED-backlit glossy display. You can also choose a high-resolution 1680-by-1050 glossy or antiglare display that gives you 36 percent more pixels.
Text is smaller

I thought you were comparing a high red glossy to a high res anti glare, where the resolution is the same, as you mention above.

Again, the standard or high res is personal preference. I've used both a lot. I prefer the high res for the added pixel space, the more crisper image, and the smaller text too. Equally, i know someone that likes the bigger text as she finds it easier to use. I find both equally easy to use btw.
 
I thought you were comparing a high red glossy to a high res anti glare, where the resolution is the same, as you mention above.

Again, the standard or high res is personal preference. I've used both a lot. I prefer the high res for the added pixel space, the more crisper image, and the smaller text too. Equally, i know someone that likes the bigger text as she finds it easier to use. I find both equally easy to use btw.

No to hikejack thread, but then the standard glossywidescreen text is bigger then the hi res glossy and hi res antiglare widescreen? Those are the 3 options. I know $1799is alot, and if people can afford the other $150 then go for it. For me another $150 for antiglare and smaller text I just can't.
I have a dell 1520 matte antiglare- forget the res, but it is fine. It is at the max 1280x800
 
No to hikejack thread, but then the standard glossywidescreen text is bigger then the hi res glossy and hi res antiglare widescreen? Those are the 3 options. I know $1799is alot, and if people can afford the other $150 then go for it. For me another $150 for antiglare and smaller text I just can't.
I have a dell 1520 matte antiglare- forget the res, but it is fine.

Everything is physically slightly bigger as standard on the normal displays, including the text. Much of the text can be altered bigger or smaller in size to suit the user on both screen types.
 
Everything is physically slightly bigger as standard on the normal displays, including the text. Much of the text can be altered bigger or smaller in size to suit the user on both screen types.

On my laptop now if i adjust res iget the shadows in my text. The res is 1280 x800. What is the hires antiglare on the macbook pro? Is it smaller then what I have?
 
On my laptop now if i adjust res iget the shadows in my text. The res is 1280 x800. What is the hires antiglare on the macbook pro? Is it smaller then what I have?

The HiRes Anti Glare 15" is 1680 x 1050. Running displays in none native resolutions makes for blurry text etc. You'd not want to run the HiRes displays in anything but the maximum resolution option.
 
The HiRes Anti Glare 15" is 1680 x 1050. Running displays in none native resolutions makes for blurry text etc. You'd not want to run the HiRes displays in anything but the maximum resolution option.

I run the res at the highest. If I do not sometimes it is not blurry. but I get the color blue shadows around my text. Anyways the native is fine. So then the mac hi res antglare 1680x1050 is smaller then my dell at 1280x800? And you don't have any glare? Just too get back on topic. Thanks for your helpand input
 
As much as I like the high res screen (it's amazing), it is not an option because of the tiny fonts. If you are considering the high res screen, please check out the screen in person (and run mail and other apps where you can't zoom in). OSX really needs resolution independence.
 
Here's my experience in a little more detail:

I've used both a Glossy standard res 15" MacBook Pro from the last years model over the last few months, and now I own an Hi Res Anti-Glare 15" MacBook Pro. I first experienced these Hi Res displays on the last generation 17" MacBook Pros I believe. I seem to remember looking at my friends new C2D and thinking, oh really small fonts, I don't like it.

As I wanted a matte type display on my laptop I wanted, I was forced by Apple to either get an old iBook G4, which I actually did buy from eBay, but it was faulty, so back it went, or get a Pro. On my iBook the screen was duller than my iMac G5 (with matte display), and I just wasn't happy with it. My plan was then to buy a MacBook, but the shiny displays on those, even without the glass panel like on the Pro range wasn't what I wanted. There was no other alternatives other than to get a MacBook Pro with Anti-Glare, which in this new range, is more expensive than the last, where the different screen would have only cost half as much. Thanks to Apple almost £1500 spent to get a computer I was happy with.

I am happy with it, very much so. The matte bright screen shows images full of colour and crisp fonts. The downside to the higher resolution with all the extra space (pixels) to work with is the font size in some of the programs. Much is customisable, such as web pages viewed in Safari (where you use the Pinch Open & Close motion on the trackpad to change the text size), or the contact list in Adium (think MSN), and the Dock icons that you can set to any size. It's a fact that some people will find the higher resolution to be no good for them, and that some of the text will be too small. Apple needs to allow the user to set the system fonts higher. Some applications, such as Adobe Dreamweaver CS5 has too small fonts in the menu structure/windows, but things like this will get rectified in time as the trend becomes for higher resolution laptops. So all in all, only some fonts are too small for me for easy viewing.

So do you go with high res, standard res, glossy or anti-glare? All depends on your circumstances. For me I went Hi Res Anti-Glare because I wanted Anti-Glare, not because I wanted Hi Res, but I've grown to accept the change from what I was used to, and I now prefer it anyway. Hi Res or standard Glossy? I don't know. I've not used the Hi Res Glossy ones before, so couldn't tell you. The differences between the Anti-Glare and the Glossy screens, disregarding the resolution options, has been discussed elsewhere, many times, and again it comes down to personal preference and what you want from your laptop. There really is no right or wrong, and asking what one is best isn't the way to go about it. Decide what screen you want depending on what you want to use your laptop for, and if you are not fussed with things like that and just want a new laptop, get the standard resolution (and that'd be in Glossy).

I wanted a matte screen because I wasn't happy with the reflections on the Glossy, which I'd never experienced before when using a computer, and because I knew that I'd find design work easier to do with a matte screen. I went in the shop first to check out the Hi Res Anti-Glare displays to make sure I was buying the right thing, as I was concerned about the font sizes. Almost immediately, I thought that the screen looks way better, silver bezel and all, compared to the standard Glossy I had been using.

The Glossy MacBook Pro that I had been using is my Mums, and her concern when buying her laptop was the font sizes, even on a standard resolution one. She has no problems with her computer, but I know for a fact that both my parents would find it difficult to use my Anti-Glare. My Dad struggles sometimes with the fonts on his iMac, which is of a lower resolution.

So the best advice is to go and try before you buy, as there is no right or wrong MacBook Pros, just the right or wrong personal choices.
 
I run the res at the highest. If I do not sometimes it is not blurry. but I get the color blue shadows around my text. Anyways the native is fine. So then the mac hi res antglare 1680x1050 is smaller then my dell at 1280x800? And you don't have any glare? Just too get back on topic. Thanks for your helpand input

I'm not sure what you mean by glare on my Anti-Glare display? :) It's the brightest, sharpest, crispest, best display I've used so far, with no glare or distortion. I imagine that the fonts on mine will be smaller than on yours, as a generalisation. Also everything else will be slightly smaller.
 
its hard to go from high res to standard res. thats what i did i had last gen 17 went to a standard res 15 then back up to the high res anti glare 17. its hard to adj to lower res when you are used to high res.
 
Bought the AG HR 15 inch and I love the display. I agree with the other posters that the AG screens are more professional looking and a must for any Photoshop or Final Cut Pro user:)
 
I got the 15" i5 with the Glossy HR screen. The added resolution (I had the 2007 15" matter at 1440x900 prior) really adds a lot, and after dealing with that mess of a matte screen (it's really hard to keep clean, and if you use the wrong cleaning supplies it will completely ruin the screen), the glossy glass screen was really welcome.

I went back to the old 15" a few days ago to grab some files off it, and I thought the display was acting weird, but it wasn't... the 1440x900 resolution looks horrible now. Everything was so big and bulky.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.