If I can pick from any genre, then Biggie. Dude was pretty great.
If we're only talking rock, probably Freddie Mercury. I'm not even that into Queen, but he was one hell of a musician, I'd be keen to see what he'd be like today.
I would bring back Dimebag Darrell.
For those who don't know, he was on stage performing with Damageplan when an obsessed Pantera fan shot him.
R.I.P.
Am I the only one who thinks Curt Cobain and Nirvana are kinda overrated? No disrespect to them, just never really got their music.
Am I the only one who thinks Curt Cobain and Nirvana are kinda overrated? No disrespect to them, just never really got their music. Just talking into a mic with slow and quiet chords between choruses then when the choruses come up instruments get louder and speed up.
Brad Nowell, Kurt Cobain, or John Lennon
Am I the only one who thinks Curt Cobain and Nirvana are kinda overrated? No disrespect to them, just never really got their music. Just talking into a mic with slow and quiet chords between choruses then when the choruses come up instruments get louder and speed up.
You could say that about anything though. Johnny Cash become becomes a man singing over a guitar. MF Doom becomes a man speaking rhyming sentences over a drum machine, with cartoons sampled at the beginning and end of the song. Breaking a band or artist down to the components that make them up will never fully portray their music. Obviously not everyone will like all music, it's all subjective, but to ignore that music is more than a sum of its elements is to miss the entire point of music in the first place.
That is a good point, but Johnny Cash was never known for his instrumentals or his great vocal ability. He was known for being one tough son of a bitch (which he was), and telling stories through his music, a lot of them being true, relevant to the time he was in, or events that actually happened to him. I just don't get that through Nirvana's music.
Like I said though, I was born in '93 so I might have had to really live in the 90's as a teenager to see what was so special about Nirvana.
I was born in 1990, so we're not so different in terms of generations. I know a guy who loves Nirvana who was born in '92. It's not even about growing up with it, it's just whether or not you can identify with the music or enjoy it. Music is entertainment, and just as you are entertained by Johnny Cash, others are entertained by Nirvana. There's nothing wrong with it not being your thing, just as there's nothing wrong with other people not liking the music you like. Personally, I find both to be good, depending on my mood, but typically I'm a massive hip-hop/rap fan. There's no hard and fast rule about who you have to like based on when/how you grew up.