Here's the problem with the article, you can NOT buy genuine Apple batteries anywhere but Apple. Just because you buy some battery with some little Apple logo on it doesn't make it genuine.
I just don't understand the huge resistance to just replace batteries at Apple for $69 or whatever it is. Your phone is an expensive, precision item that you use probably more than anything, so for how critical people claim their phone to be, I just can't understand the huge uproar where people insist on using 3rd party parts.
You can still use 3rd party batteries, go ahead. But don't complain when Apple won't support it, you know by now that Apple is resistant to do so, so in classic fashion, you really do get what you pay for trying to save a mere $30-$40 on a battery.
Well for all of my lithium ion batteries I use and recharge, yes I expect battery health information on what I use to recharge them with. Works with any brand of battery.
Just like other battery chemistries... The brand doesn't matter. It's a battery not a heart transplant.
Then providers should become authorized apple service centers..
I fail to see the big deal about this. This is meant for outrage clicks.
Obviously, there's software/hardware involved that analyzes the factory installed iPhone batteries. Apple (and Texas Instruments) designed it that way. Do people seriously expect the battery health analysis to work with 3rd party batteries? At least it tells you that the battery may not be genuine, which is a red flag in and of itself. That is good enough in my opinion.
I'd stop actively trafficking in apologia for consumer-hostile behavior, but hey, you do you.Actually, it would be "tangential" because the article is about batteries rather than privacy. Nevertheless, as I said, I'm placing a lot of trust in Apple that what might be to their advantage is also to ours (playing devil's advocate). Perhaps it is just greed, but it's not unreasonable to assume a "general" policy of limiting repairs is more managable for Apple. If so (and yes, I recognize it's a big if), I'd rather follow that policy than have Apple abandon its "security overwatch".
And, unfortunately, I don't think we can count on the current Administration to regulate to consumers' advantage anytime soon.
Which, in keeping with tradition, will never happen.at least until Apple provides that information to independent technicians
Vehicle batteries in cars powered by a battery can be purchased from other manufacturers? Can I buy a replacement battery for my Tesla?
Absolute BS greedy move, clearly because battery replacements (esp. the discounted ones after iOS throttling hit the news) have hurt their shamelessly priced iPhone X-R-S gen sales and bottomline. And at the same time Tim will continue bragging about "sustainability" and regurgitate inspirational calendar nonsense while bleeding customers dry. smh
All six of us in my family got our iPhone batteries replaced by Apple at the same time and our batteries felt like new for about two months after we got them and then they went to crap. My brother’s battery actually expanded within the first month and caused the screen on his iPhone 7 to pop out of the phone’s frame. “Yeah, that’s happens sometimes,” said the Apple Store tech... They were just as bad as the old batteries we had replaced after a couple months of use. In contrast, I got my iPhone 5 battery once replaced at a random hole in the wall battery store and that battery was solid until the day I sold it. I, for one, question the quality of the replacement batteries that Apple installs into their iPhones. Based on my own experience and that of my family members, it seems like the replacement batteries they use don’t match the quality of the ones that are originally installed.
Well, even in the United States, the nearest AASP to me is a couple hours away driving and the nearest Apple Store is even further. There are unauthorized cell phone repair shops just minutes away from me, though.
It's 100% accurate. You, me, or almost anyone on this forum can replace their battery if they have a BMW.{snipped for brevity}
Your analogy that a battery is a simple wear item like oil, battery or brakes is completely false.
They did a swap battery from one iPhone to other iPhone and it still display services message. Did you even read the post?
By the way, battery is manufactured in China by various manufacturers. If you know anything about supply chain, you will know you can easily get original Apple battery from the manufacture.
Also, since the battery is manufacturers by other manufacturers, you can easily get same quality battery from SAME manufacture that has no Apple logo. It can be same, just without Apple logo.
Once I went to China, you can get original battery for under $20USD.
ifixit said:Here's the bigger problem: our lab tests confirmed that even when you swap in a genuine Apple battery, the phone will still display the "Service" message.
Doesn’t the phone still work, you just don’t get battery health info?
I’d be curious to know what percentage of iPhone battery replacements are coming from non-certified 3rd parties. My guess is the number is small but iFixit needs it’s Apple outrage clicks.
What happens when Apple decides they no longer want to service your iPhone because of its age? Apple charges $50 to change the battery, and it takes them forever, and you have to schedule an appointment. You can change it yourself for less than $10 in the comfort of your own home, in less than 15 minutes.
tired of ifixit whining about the future of their business
I fail to see the big deal about this. This is meant for outrage clicks.
Obviously, there's software/hardware involved that analyzes the factory installed iPhone batteries. Apple (and Texas Instruments) designed it that way. Do people seriously expect the battery health analysis to work with 3rd party batteries? At least it tells you that the battery may not be genuine, which is a red flag in and of itself. That is good enough in my opinion.
Are you sure? The post is clearly about non genuine iPhone batteries.
Yes, that's not wrong. But even if you grant all that, it's 1) not really what Apple is saying, and 2) it doesn't change that the message is accurate: Apple can't vouch for the long-term behavior of a third-party battery's behavior.
At best, what they could do (if they wanted to) is provide a spec for third parties to make matching controllers. Even then, Apple would have to trust their behavior.
Your car is an even more expensive precision item. Lots of people put third party wearables on them, (I wonder if you've ever fitted non premium tyres or used cheaper oil).Here's the problem with the article, you can NOT buy genuine Apple batteries anywhere but Apple. Just because you buy some battery with some little Apple logo on it doesn't make it genuine.
I just don't understand the huge resistance to just replace batteries at Apple for $69 or whatever it is. Your phone is an expensive, precision item that you use probably more than anything, so for how critical people claim their phone to be, I just can't understand the huge uproar where people insist on using 3rd party parts.
You can still use 3rd party batteries, go ahead. But don't complain when Apple won't support it, you know by now that Apple is resistant to do so, so in classic fashion, you really do get what you pay for trying to save a mere $30-$40 on a battery.
…which is exactly why third-party repair shops—which are unable to obtain genuine parts from Apple—have stepped in to fill the void that Apple leaves.That's the reality of living in a rural area. If you want things to resemble the way they are in cities, you have to move closer to one. There simply aren't enough people in your area for it to make sense for them to invest in the off chance a dozen people in a county will need their services some day.
Buyer may or may not balk, but does the seller have the right to sell an iPhone with some cheap, crappy battery—or one from a possibly stolen iPhone—without the buyer knowing?
I don’t think it’s a bad look for Apple at all. If I were buying a used iPhone, I’d want to know if any of the parts weren’t original, not just the battery, including the display. I wouldn’t want to buy an iPhone with random replacement parts, but I guess that’s part of the gamble you take when buying used. (A lot like buying a used car for the most part.)
They earlier throttled the device to get people to buy new phones. When that didn’t work out now they are trying to get people to believe that third party batteries are inferior to the ones they sell which is not the case. Its profit maximisation at any cost.
Something has to be incorrect about that information. Apple doesn’t do any special magic after installing a battery in house.
The process is to remove the screen, remove the old battery using the battery adhesive tab and the material which helps avoid liquid from seeping through the seems, install the new battery, add a new protective element, reseal phone, and run the basic diagnostics on the device. This test will actually always return - battery not verified as verifying the battery requires the user credentials and this diagnostic is run from a diagnostic mode, not from the user OS for privacy concerns.
This diagnostic mode is available to any user, it’s a weird process of holding various volume buttons and plugging into power. The exact steps vary from device to device.
The diagnostic does require an apple certified tech, but any user can request it to be run remotely by setting up a support call or chat and simply asking them to run diagnostics for the device while you have it booted to this mode.
Quite simply, something about what is in the article has to be factually incorrect.
Yes, we’ve been hearing this for almost a decade now.
IF that happens I’ll be pissed, but the hysterics that this thread has ended up in acting *as if this is the case NOW* is ridiculous.
So then change it yourself for less money and quit whining about the features and quality you don't get by not spending more.
Pay more, get more.
[doublepost=1565288129][/doublepost]
And this is really what it is. ifixit should've just found another gig 10 years ago when products pretty much stopped being user repairable. What is even the point of continually giving 1/10 or 2/10 repairability scores? Everyone already knows they aren't repairable.