Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Here's the problem with the article, you can NOT buy genuine Apple batteries anywhere but Apple. Just because you buy some battery with some little Apple logo on it doesn't make it genuine.

I just don't understand the huge resistance to just replace batteries at Apple for $69 or whatever it is. Your phone is an expensive, precision item that you use probably more than anything, so for how critical people claim their phone to be, I just can't understand the huge uproar where people insist on using 3rd party parts.

You can still use 3rd party batteries, go ahead. But don't complain when Apple won't support it, you know by now that Apple is resistant to do so, so in classic fashion, you really do get what you pay for trying to save a mere $30-$40 on a battery.

They did a swap battery from one iPhone to other iPhone and it still display services message. Did you even read the post?

By the way, battery is manufactured in China by various manufacturers. If you know anything about supply chain, you will know you can easily get original Apple battery from the manufacture.

Also, since the battery is manufacturers by other manufacturers, you can easily get same quality battery from SAME manufacture that has no Apple logo. It can be same, just without Apple logo.

Once I went to China, you can get original battery for under $20USD.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jamezr
Well for all of my lithium ion batteries I use and recharge, yes I expect battery health information on what I use to recharge them with. Works with any brand of battery.

Just like other battery chemistries... The brand doesn't matter. It's a battery not a heart transplant.

So I feel like I'm not understanding your concern. Have you seen full battery health information anywhere other than on iOS devices?

On my MacBook Pro (2015) I can see % remaining, but not battery health.
Thats the same as my Nintendo Switch, and nearly every other lithium ion device I've seen.

With this message on the iPhone all it says is that it can't estimate the overall health of the battery, not that it can't give you a charge %.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire
I fail to see the big deal about this. This is meant for outrage clicks.

Obviously, there's software/hardware involved that analyzes the factory installed iPhone batteries. Apple (and Texas Instruments) designed it that way. Do people seriously expect the battery health analysis to work with 3rd party batteries? At least it tells you that the battery may not be genuine, which is a red flag in and of itself. That is good enough in my opinion.

There seems to be some confusion regarding that point. From the CNET version of the article:
iFixit's tests revealed that even a brand new genuine Apple battery caused the message to appear.
It appears this isn't about who made the battery, it's about who installs it.
 
Actually, it would be "tangential" because the article is about batteries rather than privacy. Nevertheless, as I said, I'm placing a lot of trust in Apple that what might be to their advantage is also to ours (playing devil's advocate). Perhaps it is just greed, but it's not unreasonable to assume a "general" policy of limiting repairs is more managable for Apple. If so (and yes, I recognize it's a big if), I'd rather follow that policy than have Apple abandon its "security overwatch".

And, unfortunately, I don't think we can count on the current Administration to regulate to consumers' advantage anytime soon.
I'd stop actively trafficking in apologia for consumer-hostile behavior, but hey, you do you.
[doublepost=1565285411][/doublepost]
at least until Apple provides that information to independent technicians
Which, in keeping with tradition, will never happen.
 
Vehicle batteries in cars powered by a battery can be purchased from other manufacturers? Can I buy a replacement battery for my Tesla?

Tesla is one car manufacturer compared to many. The ratio of Tesla owners and vehicles compared to others is no comparison. The question one must ask is if Tesla will provide an owner to purchase genuine Tesla batteries if requested.

FYI Tesla makes some of the most power efficient batteries in its sector.
 
I think this is for the better. You don't want to take chances with the battery, and now it is possible to tell if someone has been tampering.
 
Absolute BS greedy move, clearly because battery replacements (esp. the discounted ones after iOS throttling hit the news) have hurt their shamelessly priced iPhone X-R-S gen sales and bottomline. And at the same time Tim will continue bragging about "sustainability" and regurgitate inspirational calendar nonsense while bleeding customers dry. smh

What are you even talking about? Big deal - so you can't use a tool explicitly calibrated for THEIR batteries. Why would you even want to since you can't count on accuracy? It doesn't stop the phone from working, and the battery health tool is VERY seldom used at all, so what EXACTLY is causing all the histrionics?
[doublepost=1565286461][/doublepost]
All six of us in my family got our iPhone batteries replaced by Apple at the same time and our batteries felt like new for about two months after we got them and then they went to crap. My brother’s battery actually expanded within the first month and caused the screen on his iPhone 7 to pop out of the phone’s frame. “Yeah, that’s happens sometimes,” said the Apple Store tech... They were just as bad as the old batteries we had replaced after a couple months of use. In contrast, I got my iPhone 5 battery once replaced at a random hole in the wall battery store and that battery was solid until the day I sold it. I, for one, question the quality of the replacement batteries that Apple installs into their iPhones. Based on my own experience and that of my family members, it seems like the replacement batteries they use don’t match the quality of the ones that are originally installed.

Did you make sure the person you sold the phone to knew you used off-brand parts and services?
[doublepost=1565286587][/doublepost]
Well, even in the United States, the nearest AASP to me is a couple hours away driving and the nearest Apple Store is even further. There are unauthorized cell phone repair shops just minutes away from me, though.

That's the reality of living in a rural area. If you want things to resemble the way they are in cities, you have to move closer to one. There simply aren't enough people in your area for it to make sense for them to invest in the off chance a dozen people in a county will need their services some day.
 
{snipped for brevity}
Your analogy that a battery is a simple wear item like oil, battery or brakes is completely false.
It's 100% accurate. You, me, or almost anyone on this forum can replace their battery if they have a BMW.
Go to almost any autoparts store to get the correct AGM battery for your car. Purchase Foxwell NT510 or NT520 OBD2 scanner (can even be purchased at Walmart). Other tools accomplish the same task. I just prefer the Foxwell because it does a lot more than battery registration. Install battery. Use scanner to register your battery. Same tool works for BMW and Mini. I know because I've replaced batteries on my brother's 2010 335i and his wife's god awful crappy 2014 Mini Cooper.

Batteries are wear items that are meant to be replaced. They don't require OEM or authorized parts. They don't require a BMW or authorized service tech. Literally one of the easiest DIY automotive projects you or anyone can do. Completely true.
 
They did a swap battery from one iPhone to other iPhone and it still display services message. Did you even read the post?

By the way, battery is manufactured in China by various manufacturers. If you know anything about supply chain, you will know you can easily get original Apple battery from the manufacture.

Also, since the battery is manufacturers by other manufacturers, you can easily get same quality battery from SAME manufacture that has no Apple logo. It can be same, just without Apple logo.

Once I went to China, you can get original battery for under $20USD.


I absolutely read the article, and it NEVER says they swapped the battery from one iPhone to another; rather, it just says they put a supposed genuine battery in there, and the error came up:

ifixit said:
Here's the bigger problem: our lab tests confirmed that even when you swap in a genuine Apple battery, the phone will still display the "Service" message.

But considering how many people, yourself included, think genuine batteries are sold all over the place on aliexpress, fleabay, and elsewhere, it sounds like ifixit might also not know the definition of what a genuine battery is. ifixit does NOT sell genuine parts, as much as people like to believe they do. A

How can you say you went to China and could determine if a battery was even genuine at all? Why, because it had an Apple logo on it? Lol.

Anyway, all y'all can go waste $30-$40 on a junk, questionably sourced battery that is 99.99% not authentic, have a bunch of problems and rage on the internet about it, while I'll spend the extra $30 to just get it done right at Apple, know what I have is genuine, know that it works, and know that my warranty and support are intact. What a bizarre place to waste energy. Apple doesn't play well with third party junk parts, and this isn't news - you all know this by now, so you get what you pay for. As for right to repair, yeah, go ahead and repair it with whatever parts you want that Apple has no control over, but don't hold them to honoring warranty on a device fixed with parts they know nothing about and didn't spec. This is such a tired whinefest every time people want to cheap out.
 
Last edited:
Doesn’t the phone still work, you just don’t get battery health info?

I’d be curious to know what percentage of iPhone battery replacements are coming from non-certified 3rd parties. My guess is the number is small but iFixit needs it’s Apple outrage clicks.

What happens when Apple decides they no longer want to service your iPhone because of its age? Apple charges $50 to change the battery, and it takes them forever, and you have to schedule an appointment. You can change it yourself for less than $10 in the comfort of your own home, in less than 15 minutes.
 
What happens when Apple decides they no longer want to service your iPhone because of its age? Apple charges $50 to change the battery, and it takes them forever, and you have to schedule an appointment. You can change it yourself for less than $10 in the comfort of your own home, in less than 15 minutes.

So then change it yourself for less money and quit whining about the features and quality you don't get by not spending more.

Pay more, get more.
[doublepost=1565288129][/doublepost]
tired of ifixit whining about the future of their business

And this is really what it is. ifixit should've just found another gig 10 years ago when products pretty much stopped being user repairable. What is even the point of continually giving 1/10 or 2/10 repairability scores? Everyone already knows they aren't repairable.
 
Imagine apple bricking their iCAR if people fill up at unauthorized gas stations. Because safety, gasoline is extremely flammable.
 
Back before Apple started doing the $29 replacement I ordered a battery from ifixit for my 6S+. Back then Apple was already doing this as my phone was saying the battery needed service in the battery app and that phone is on iOS 11 to this day.
 
I fail to see the big deal about this. This is meant for outrage clicks.

Obviously, there's software/hardware involved that analyzes the factory installed iPhone batteries. Apple (and Texas Instruments) designed it that way. Do people seriously expect the battery health analysis to work with 3rd party batteries? At least it tells you that the battery may not be genuine, which is a red flag in and of itself. That is good enough in my opinion.

It's not a third-party battery. It happens with identical batteries taken from other brand new iPhones. This isn't about sourcing parts, it is about who is allowed to repair iPhones. Apple wants that to be done in house (for economic, not safety, reasons).
 
  • Like
Reactions: skinned66
Are you sure? The post is clearly about non genuine iPhone batteries.

"(...) our lab tests confirmed that even when you swap in a genuine Apple battery, the phone will still display the "Service" message."

There you go. So it works like Touch ID - serial numbers of battery and iPhone are paired and even if you put in brand new, original battery without Apple blessing it (probably plugging it into their special tool to overwrite pairing) it will still say that battery needs servicing. Despite that, battery will work just fine.

If you are aware of it, it's no problem. However it's a HUGE issue for repair shops. Imagine you replace battery and the first thing your customer asks you is: why does it say the battery still needs servicing? Will you be able to explain it believably? It's an attack on repair shops to undermine their reputation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: racerxe
Yes, that's not wrong. But even if you grant all that, it's 1) not really what Apple is saying, and 2) it doesn't change that the message is accurate: Apple can't vouch for the long-term behavior of a third-party battery's behavior.

At best, what they could do (if they wanted to) is provide a spec for third parties to make matching controllers. Even then, Apple would have to trust their behavior.

Can we stop with this nonsense propaganda? I swear these forums are worse than Pravda sometimes.
 
Here's the problem with the article, you can NOT buy genuine Apple batteries anywhere but Apple. Just because you buy some battery with some little Apple logo on it doesn't make it genuine.

I just don't understand the huge resistance to just replace batteries at Apple for $69 or whatever it is. Your phone is an expensive, precision item that you use probably more than anything, so for how critical people claim their phone to be, I just can't understand the huge uproar where people insist on using 3rd party parts.

You can still use 3rd party batteries, go ahead. But don't complain when Apple won't support it, you know by now that Apple is resistant to do so, so in classic fashion, you really do get what you pay for trying to save a mere $30-$40 on a battery.
Your car is an even more expensive precision item. Lots of people put third party wearables on them, (I wonder if you've ever fitted non premium tyres or used cheaper oil).
Your car is a potential missile that could threaten the life of yourself and others. If it's Ok for a car, I feel Ok taking my chances with a phone.
 
This could be a potential risk to consumers with batteries replaced other than Apple as they are not going to know if they need to change the battery and just keep on using it to the point of it swelling and then catching fire all because Apple refuses to let them know if they battery they have is healthy unless they pay Apple totally irresistible of Apple they have zero disc regard for their customers well being all about £ these days to $pple
 
That's the reality of living in a rural area. If you want things to resemble the way they are in cities, you have to move closer to one. There simply aren't enough people in your area for it to make sense for them to invest in the off chance a dozen people in a county will need their services some day.
…which is exactly why third-party repair shops—which are unable to obtain genuine parts from Apple—have stepped in to fill the void that Apple leaves.

More broadly, are you seriously trying to pull a “you’re holding it wrong” on where people live? Setting aside the myriad reasons why someone may not wish to live in a larger city, should anywhere located more than an hour or so away from the nearest metropolitan area, then, just become an empty void? Because Apple arbitrarily makes it financially infeasible to become an AASP in many cases outside of densely populated areas? Why else?

To become an AASP, for example, you are reportedly required to pay exorbitant sums for parts to have in stock that Apple chooses, not you, along with numerous other requirements. There's no functional reason for why someone would suddenly need to stock millions of dollars' worth of parts right away, but Apple requires it, likely as an arbitrary barrier to entry to businesses that would otherwise be perfectly viable.

And for reference, I'm not in some extremely remote, desolate land. I live in south-central Missouri; my county has about 40,000 residents, more than enough for a couple of repair shops to operate successfully. My city is the largest in Missouri for about a 70-mile radius; if an AASP would be viable anywhere remotely nearby, it’d be here. But it’s not. Getting Apple-authorized service is a day trip, and no, that's not my fault for living here. Don't blame me for it.
 
Buyer may or may not balk, but does the seller have the right to sell an iPhone with some cheap, crappy battery—or one from a possibly stolen iPhone—without the buyer knowing?

I don’t think it’s a bad look for Apple at all. If I were buying a used iPhone, I’d want to know if any of the parts weren’t original, not just the battery, including the display. I wouldn’t want to buy an iPhone with random replacement parts, but I guess that’s part of the gamble you take when buying used. (A lot like buying a used car for the most part.)

Yes! Of course they do. For what other product sector would this not be allowed?
[doublepost=1565290077][/doublepost]
They earlier throttled the device to get people to buy new phones. When that didn’t work out now they are trying to get people to believe that third party batteries are inferior to the ones they sell which is not the case. Its profit maximisation at any cost.

You mean the ones they don't sell? You can't buy a genuine OEM replacement battery from Apple. You have to get it serviced by an Apple Store or authorized repair tech.
[doublepost=1565290225][/doublepost]
Something has to be incorrect about that information. Apple doesn’t do any special magic after installing a battery in house.

The process is to remove the screen, remove the old battery using the battery adhesive tab and the material which helps avoid liquid from seeping through the seems, install the new battery, add a new protective element, reseal phone, and run the basic diagnostics on the device. This test will actually always return - battery not verified as verifying the battery requires the user credentials and this diagnostic is run from a diagnostic mode, not from the user OS for privacy concerns.

This diagnostic mode is available to any user, it’s a weird process of holding various volume buttons and plugging into power. The exact steps vary from device to device.

The diagnostic does require an apple certified tech, but any user can request it to be run remotely by setting up a support call or chat and simply asking them to run diagnostics for the device while you have it booted to this mode.

Quite simply, something about what is in the article has to be factually incorrect.

Did you read the article? It says they reset the error message when they service the batteries in house. So yes, apparently they do do some "special magic" after installing a battery in house.
 
Yes, we’ve been hearing this for almost a decade now.

IF that happens I’ll be pissed, but the hysterics that this thread has ended up in acting *as if this is the case NOW* is ridiculous.

It already happened once with the home button. It happens with Macs where everything is glued/soldered now and you can’t easily replace some parts due to security chip. To those who were not asleep for the last decade the trend is obvious, that’s why people are worried. There’s no reason to not give user info on his battery if it was replaced by someone else.
 
So then change it yourself for less money and quit whining about the features and quality you don't get by not spending more.

Pay more, get more.
[doublepost=1565288129][/doublepost]

And this is really what it is. ifixit should've just found another gig 10 years ago when products pretty much stopped being user repairable. What is even the point of continually giving 1/10 or 2/10 repairability scores? Everyone already knows they aren't repairable.

Pretty sure that if Apple starts selling parts direct to consumers and publishes repair manuals (like right to repair and iFixit are asking for) that puts iFixit out of business, or at least introduces heavy competition. AFAIK things right now are pretty nice for iFixit, they get to profit on teaching people how to repair things that aren't obviously repairable. Seems to me like they're pushing back mostly for the good of the environment and consumers.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but that's the way it looks to me. I don't see how passing right to repair and making Apple do what iFixit currently does (providing parts and manuals) helps iFixit.

Besides, what good ever came from sitting quietly and accepting "good enough"? I'm generally happy to see people complain about things that could be better. How do you think we got automotive right to repair? Do you always take your car to the dealer to get it repaired (if you can afford to then good for you, you make more money than I do)? Why do you think your local shop is able to source OEM parts? What about amendments to the Constitution?

As an aside, paying more might get you genuine Apple parts, but it also gets you super long wait times and less experienced techs (in my experience). I'm lucky enough to live near an Apple store, but I'd still trust the small shop downtown to fix my phone any day. The owner has an engineering degree and has been repairing electronics for 30+ years, they usually do things like a battery swap in an hour, and they know how to do things an AASP isn't allowed to do in house. When I got my phone wet and bricked it, Apple said recovering the photos was impossible, local shop got it done in a day. Sometimes, things that are more expensive are worse.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.