Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I don’t see the point of pulling apart a pair of headphones anyway that cost $899 because I wouldn’t be buying them at that price there’s nothing they would do that would make me spend that amount of money them no matter how many chips they put in them. To try and make them sound good.
When did these get $450 price increase
 
I have to say that is some gorgeous construction for a consume headphone. I realize these headphones are in the upper end of consumer head phone prices. But they do remind me of what the original iphone felt like compared to all the plastic phones of the day. I’m really curious if all those chips and mics really do create “better” sound. I really think apple should have included 32gb of flash for onboard music storage. Especially at this price point. It would allow even lossless music to be enjoyed on these.
 
My comment was in regards to what iFixit and many others in the right to repair camp believe Apple should change with design and build etc.
Hmmm, I did not get that from what you wrote. I'm guessing most of the meaning was between the lines. :D :D
You're telling me only Mac that's meant to be repaired is the Mac Pro (9 out of 10) while every other Mac such as the 15" MacBook Pro (1 out of 10), 16" MacBook Pro (1 out of 10), or MacBook Air (3 out of 10) is to be thrown away and replaced with a new one when it stops working? :rolleyes:

Do you work for Apple?
I'm not telling you anything 'cept you severely misinterpreted what you read in my comment. To be fair, that could be my fault for the way I wrote it. What I am actually saying is there are things that are designed without consideration of DIY repair. Those things will typically receive a low repair score from a company that specializes in DIY repair. To borrow from your example, the MP is designed to be user accessible for upgrades, maintenance, and repair. It gets a good repair score. MBP's and MBA's are not designed to be user accessible for upgrades, maintenance, and repair, hence the low scores.
 


iFixit today began disassembling Apple's new AirPods Max headphones for one of its traditional device teardowns, with the aim of determining whether the AirPods Max are repairable to any degree or an "e-waste disaster." The teardown is in progress and will be updated over the course of the next few days.

ifixit-airpods-max-xray.jpg

This is an early, partial disassembly that also includes a quick x-ray look inside the headphones. The x-ray view provides a glimpse at the battery cell in each ear cup, dual-ring speaker driver magnets, alignment magnets, brackets for microphones, and more.

iFixit did not find it easy to get into the AirPods Max and there was quite a bit of glue involved. There are two logic boards inside riddled with chips, which iFixit plans to identify later in more detail.

ifixit-airpods-max-teardown.jpg

So far, there are no other details available on the AirPods Max as the teardown is ongoing, but iFixit says that it will be updated over the coming days and there's "lots more to come" including some surprises for headphone fans.

Article Link: iFixit Starts Tearing Down AirPods Max
Why not just accept the fact that all these things are not meant to be repaired. Just don’t break it.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Websnapx2
Imagine destroying 550 dollar headphones when poor Americans like me are struggling with our 250 dollar headphones. MONSTERS! THE HUMANITY!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: windowsblowsass
Looks awesome! I don’t understand why anyone would compare AirPods max to Sony’s, Sony’s xm4 build quality is not even in the same league as Apple.
 
It's in the name. Some people like to fix the devices they own. Others may be interested in technology and how things work. Some may even be professional repair technicians.

This site's creators are probably all of the above, and the repairability score is not directed at Apple (or any other company's) zealots, fans, cheerleaders, fanboys, defenders, etc.

It is intended to be, among other things, a decision tool for consumers so that people can make informed decisions regarding their product purchases, as well as help them determine (if they are so inclined) whether or not a particular repair job is above their skill level, risk acceptance level, or repair tool inventory.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Looks awesome! I don’t understand why anyone would compare AirPods max to Sony’s, Sony’s xm4 build quality is not even in the same league as Apple.
Well, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

In my household, they're a split decision: 3/5 in favor of Beats and Sony design over these.

I happen to be in the minority and love the techno-industrial elegant look, even if the green ones remind me of my Air Force-issue Dave Clarks.
 
Im still impressed enough with my $250 Air pod pro and my $80 anker over the ear charged my anker for the 4th time since march.
 
Let me guess. It get’s a zero for repairability. Honestly, the clickbait with these guys...
do you think they should get a high score? do you think it's acceptable for user devices to have nearly zero options for repairing ones own devices?

mayhaps you'd like to speak to farmers who have john deere equipment that they have to jailbreak with ukrainian software, just to unlock the ability to work on their own machinery. i guess you'd really appreciate having that level of lockdown preventing you from servicing your own devices.
 
It all boils down to whether or not the battery is replaceable and if so, how difficult it is to replace it.

That’s it. That’s 95% of the repairability factor in regards to how long the product can last. The main issue with regular AirPods is that the battery can’t practically be replaced, so the entire headphones die. That’s what I’m hoping to see avoided here.

That's fake news. Apple will replace air pods battery for $49.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Websnapx2
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.