Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You want Apple to support illegal piracy?

Its true! Even in the US (in 2014) Optical media made up nearly 8 billion dollars of profit in the home entertainment category, where as digital downloads were just over 1 billion dollar.

The person you are referring didn't mean illegal DVDs :p
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Benjamin Frost
And there in lies the problem. "Only thing Apple is listening are sales numbers." - So Apple couldn't care about what the iMac is like given it sells. With that attitude Apple is well on the way to being the Microsoft of old. We don't care how bad Windows is, as long as it is selling.
Microsoft didn't sell computers at the time...
Windows didn't sell very well. Most of the copies were pirated for years.
Yes, Apple listen to sales numbers, like any company should do. iMacs don't sell ? Ok people don't like it and they have to change their decisions.
But if Mac sales keep going up in the next quarter like they did in the last, well ....


What a bloody elitist attitude. " if you can't afford the one you need straight up". I try to keep my computers for 6-7 years so buying what i need in 7 years is going to cost a BOMB. If I had gone down the road of a Retina Macbook Pro, it would have cost me $1500 more than what I paid for my non retina Pro( with my requirement of a 1TB SSD and RAM). I'm glad you can obviously afford to pay truckloads more for your future needs but I can't afford it at Apple's highway robbery upgrade prices. it is an absolute joke.

It's life, dude.
A 4K iMac is not a computer you can keep 7 years. If you are looking for something like that, look in another direction.
If you configure it accordingly, it will last 4-5 years. And you need money to do that. You can't afford it, you don't buy it.

This is not just about me. Its about the general population who will not upgrade their computers at purchase. Many don't. That makes their machines a very poor second hand machine, where as an upgradable baseline will allow the second purchaser to make use of it, instead of it going to waste. As I said, very few old Macs would be in service now had they not been upgradable.

You are free to do whatever you want with you money.
Don't speak about the general population, because I think Apple 's market analysis department knows better than you what their target is.

Are you serious? 3 Years is not a long time. Paying for an extra 2 years is very expensive and then what happens after that? Hit with logic board replacement fees for a simple SDD failure which will probably occur outside the warranty period anyway.

Why should we have to hand Apple more money for an overpriced warranty on an overpriced computer that should not have the SSD soldered in the first place?

3 years for me are a reasonable period of time for a computer.
You think differently? Don't buy a Mac.
To me AppleCare is a must.

McDonalds sales are probably also growing. So they make the perfect food then?



So we pay more money to Apple for having the SSD soldered to the logic board which provides no benefit to us? Right.

This shows absolute fanboism. You're standing up for Apple over the customer.
Last time I checked, McDonald's sold hamburgers, not computers....
Again, I'm not going to buy an iMac.
It doesn't fit my needs.

How long should a Mac priced more than $1000 last?
Why should we pay extra to keep it running?

Again it isn't my issue, it's Apple quality issue.
You can google it and see these are not isolated cases.

Because many Apple customers are used to pay the extra money and feel superior Apple quality isn't getting any better because they make more money out of it, either because many of the new crop of Apple
Customers are used to replace the iPods and iPhones every year and pay for the Apple care.
Refusing to pay for an insurance to cover Apple's terrible quality is my choice. Sadly I'm not in the current majority of new Apple customers.

If only more consumers behave better then Apple will improve their quality.
Apple quality is simply the best I found, bending in the field since 1987.
On google I could find a flying horse: that doesn't make it true.

he said since they dropped the drive not because. obviously with every year optical drives are used less but it certainly wasnt the right time then. apple didnt help ease people of them they just made it more complicated for people.

as for being more reliable can you post stats on that? as far as being more recyclable the best thing is to be able to use the computer as long as possible and get as much out of it. its unrelated to this topic but itunes 12 not working on sl means lots of fully functioning computers cant be used with new ios devices. back on point are you really claiming that all this soldering and locking out users/hackers has made the computer more recyclable? if so then please expand.



seems quite obvious. ifixit promotes users to make and get the best out of their machines. sadly the computer industry is evolving in this way thought (every big business is). then he he goes through apples history and rules and laws.



if its a serious question whether it makes sense to repair the computer because of the high repair cost then it certainly is not that serviceable. the option has to be realistic. buying and upgrading later most importantly gives people the option to really evaluate what they need and spread the cost over the lifetime of the machine.



no they havent. its only in the last few 3-4 years apple has been on this route with the imac. obviously people know that however there isnt a whole lot of other mac options out there hence the frustration.



applecare dosent make the quality any better. that cant be too hard to understand. how long you use your devices is your own prerogative.

i must say it is interesting (though not mildly surprising) to see the number of the lovers of the totalitarian rulers we have in giants like apple.

i mean jeez not trusting a site which documents every step of the teardowns because they broke an agreement you are not party to.
Again. Don't like iMacs ? Don't buy it.
From what I'm seeing, there are plenty of happy users out of this thread.
But the pattern is well known on this forum: if don't scream, and cry, and bash Apple in every post you are a fanboy.

The hilarious thing is that I criticized the new iMac since the beginning and I said several times I'm not going to buy one.
But nobody even took the time to actually read my posts.
If you don't say "Apple is evil" you don't worth any attention here

Oh please give me a break from your ardent fanboism defending of Apple. Its just an excuse on your part to show that no matter what Apple does you'll stick up for them over the consumer.

And when they replace it it will cause a lot more environmental damage that it should of. Applecare is not mandatory, as repairs on a very expensive computer should not involve replacing the logic board when another component dies.

But in the end whats the use? You only care about Apple's bottom line. The fact that the environment and consumers will suffer as a result of this cost cutting decision (because thats really all that it is).

But oh no, Apple's bottom line which must really be suffering. Oh poor Apple, they're doing so poorly that they need to cost cut and rip off the consumer.



What because Apple's quality is so bad that its a necessity?

Theres probably no point in me replying to you any more as in some people's eyes, As long as Apple is making that bit more, everything is fine.

Apple quality is among (if not THE) the best on the market.
And you bashers saying something different doesn't change a proved fact (look at customer satisfaction numbers).

So are you saying we cannot voice our opinions that criticize Apple? We are free to voice our displeasure with the direction apple is taking. What you consider is whining, many of us think of is voicing our opinion. Not everyone blindly walks lockstep with Apple,


I think you missed the point, why give more money to Apple when they shouldn't need too.

Apple's direction on their computer line reminds me of GM back in the 80s when they basically introduced planned obsolesces into the cars, i.e., they designed the cars to only last a few years so you had to go back and buy a new one. While Apple quality is still good, I see a similar approach by Apple.
Voicing opinions is a matter, fueling up hysteria like some well known users are doing in every single news is another matter.
I know perfectly well your attitude regarding Apple, even if you are a moderator (this is not an Apple forum). You are entitled to have your idea , like I'm entitled to have mine.
As a moderator you should avoid people name calling me (I was referred as a fanboy several times in this thread), but that's another matter. I don't really care, I'm an Apple supporter after all. I didn't even report them.
You don't like the way Apple is going.
In some way I don't like it too.
I said what I don't like about iMacs, I'd like to discuss about performance and options instead of read tons of posts about how evil Apple is. Don't you agree ?
 
As a moderator you should avoid people name calling me (I was referred as a fanboy several times in this thread),
Please report those posts, I've not read every post in the thread and the moderation staff works as a team, so your report can be reviewed by the team and handled.

I know perfectly well your attitude regarding Apple, even if you are a moderator (this is not an Apple forum). You are entitled to have your idea , like I'm entitled to have mine.
You are entitled to your opinion and I respect your opinion, but conversely those who have negative opinions of the iMac seem to be marginalized, or dismissed as whining.

You don't like the way Apple is going.
No and that bothers me, because I am an Apple fan. They have a rich history of producing some great products and when I see Apple deciding more on profit and less on design, then I'll say something.
 
@Max(IT) just my current example: http://bfy.tw/2KfI

Here you can see who effective Apple had been at convincing people that they "must" buy Apple Care to take care of Apple's own failures.

---- additional comments:

Customer service is just one of the many types of quality you expect from any company selling product. Apple excel at it.

Manufacturing quality is terrible.

I beat you by a few years, Apple user since the Apple ][+, plenty of Macs and other devices.

I will list you a few additional examples:
- Color iPod 32GB - dead after 3 years after a simple software update, shows the sad face icon with no other reason but an iTunes update.
- Late 2006 MacBook Intel Core Duo 2 - plastic case broken on the palm rest area. Repaired a couple of times by Apple Genius Bar after varios interactions with the manager. Broke again and again. Defective charing port and magsafe pins, worn out and not charging. Apple didn't want to cover it. I did the repair myself. Until it was damaged by a coca cola spill. A few years afterwards they have a service fix in their website.
- Late 2008 MacBook Pro - battery doesn't last 1 hour, defective charging port required replacing the motherboard chipset. Paid depot repair fee ~$300 - seems to be a better deal than Apple Care for portables.
- iPhone 3G - plastic case with plenty of crack lines, replaced 4 times
- iPhone 3Gs - plastic case with crack lines, and poor battery, replaced 3 times
- iPhone 4 - antennagate, got free bumper
- iPhone 5 - battery sucks, and sleep/wake button not working, replaced, and the replacement is repeating the same issues
- iPhone 6+ - ear speaker doesn't have enough volume, got it replaced improved a little, but it is still lower than previous iPhones I had used.
- Late 2013 iMac - broken spring to keep display leveled as shown in the link above.

I didn't experience any issues in all my previous Macs: Mac Plus, Mac IIsi, PowerMac G4, G5, MacBook Pro, eMac G4 1.25.

Just being reluctant to accept that Apple production quality and engineering issues are real doesn't change the fact that trying to book an appointment at the Genius Bar isn't possible for same day service anymore. You cannot also walk into the store and get any service done.
Another great symptom of the reality of Apple's poor quality.
 
Last edited:
Microsoft didn't sell computers at the time...
Windows didn't sell very well. Most of the copies were pirated for years.
Yes, Apple listen to sales numbers, like any company should do. iMacs don't sell ? Ok people don't like it and they have to change their decisions.
But if Mac sales keep going up in the next quarter like they did in the last, well ....

Windows sold very well.. not sure where you've been. You said that the only thing that mattered was that apple was making money so obviously there was no problem. However it is fairly widely recognised that Microsoft made money in that way - focusing on money making over the product it was selling, basically making subpar products as money was the only thing that mattered.

It's life, dude.
A 4K iMac is not a computer you can keep 7 years. If you are looking for something like that, look in another direction.
If you configure it accordingly, it will last 4-5 years. And you need money to do that. You can't afford it, you don't buy it.

It should be something that can last 7 years. You think a high end computer should last 4-5 if upgraded at purchase?? You must have a lot of money to throw away at computers. Most people don't. Many people still have 2007 iMacs in service - thats 8 years and you know why? because they can upgrade them to fit their current needs. 2GB of ram and a slow old hard-drive doesn't work very well. Why shouldn't a brand new ridiculously expensive iMac last that long?

Do you not understand the concept of needs changing over time?? When I got my first Macbook (when I stopped sharing the family eMac) years ago, I was a student with very basic needs. 2 years on, my needs had completely changed as I needed a computer capable of a lot of video editing. I had no idea that was going to happen at purchase. Luckily I was able to put the ram in I needed to run Final Cut.

However in your view, I should have shelled out more money for a new computer. Great for Apple's profits huh!

You think its reasonable to put nearly $4000 towards a computer when you're a Uni student, when you can achieve the save for a little bit over $2000 when the computer is upgradable.

You are free to do whatever you want with you money.
Don't speak about the general population, because I think Apple 's market analysis department knows better than you what their target is.

I think you mean that Apple's marketing department knows how to make the most money by producing dodgy machines that will A) Not last as long (meaning more money for Apple) B) Cost more to upgrade to start with (More money for apple) and C) will cost more to repair when it breaks (More money for apple)

3 years for me are a reasonable period of time for a computer.
You think differently? Don't buy a Mac.
To me AppleCare is a must.

You've got to be kidding. You've absolutely got to be kidding if you think 3 years is a reasonable amount of time for the iMac to last. You must have very little faith in their hardware.

Last time I checked, McDonald's sold hamburgers, not computers....
Again, I'm not going to buy an iMac.
It doesn't fit my needs.

You obviously didn't understand what I said. You said that Apple is making a lot of money so its decisions must be right and their products must be amazing. My argument is that in a lot of sectors there are low cost options that sell heaps as well. Dos that make their products amazing and all their choices right?

Of course it doesn't.

Apple quality is among (if not THE) the best on the market.
And you bashers saying something different doesn't change a proved fact (look at customer satisfaction numbers).

You don't seem to have much faith in Apple, as you say that Applecare is a must.

Satistication numbers reflect the current time. They don't reflect the environment, they don't reflect second hand buyers etc. Also Apple only started soldering stuff for the majority of its line up in the last 2/3 or so years, which won't be reflected in the usage numbers.
 
Again. Don't like iMacs ? Don't buy it.
From what I'm seeing, there are plenty of happy users out of this thread.
But the pattern is well known on this forum: if don't scream, and cry, and bash Apple in every post you are a fanboy.

The hilarious thing is that I criticized the new iMac since the beginning and I said several times I'm not going to buy one.
But nobody even took the time to actually read my posts.
If you don't say "Apple is evil" you don't worth any attention here

i think quite a lot of people have noticed that its very hard to interact with you and the incorrect things you often say as well as not directly responding but rather saying the same thing over and over.

this mantra "dont like it dont buy it" adds nothing to the conversation. most of us here know thats how it is and thats the trend of the last few years. hell we have been the ones that have said this will happen to this part next and this model etc. what is taking place is a discussion about the decisions and how this is environmentally unfriendly (which makes apple a hypocrite) and disrespect to their customers and their wallets.

i happen to own two late 2006 imacs that are perfectly fine yet for the simple reason that the latest itunes dosent work on sl that means those machines wont work with the newest ios devices. one stinking program that does nothing but sync various kinds of files.

there are a few extreme people here and you are one of them. the lot of you spin everything in apples favour. if its workers conditions abroad apple has no blame because they only pay billions to contractors. if its products not lasting its the buyers fault for not buying applecare etc etc.

we even have people in this thread that are so distanced from reality that they say they dont believe a teardown guide and the repairability score because of an nda issue which btw is none of their concern. meanwhile of course we have apple choosing time and time again not to pay for patents because they dont feel like it but of course that must be because the patent holder is a patent troll.
 
Last edited:
Even though an xMac can be ran for many years if they indeed release new real hardware features that justify making the upgrade to a new machine worth it then they will stop the nonsense.

Unfortunately, the main "innovation" over the last several years has been the revelation that the vast majority of computer users would prefer a laptop or tablet to a desktop. I'd say Apple have been doing well at driving the development of laptops: they've popularised retina displays when the rest of the world thought 1080p was enough, they've popularised SSD-only laptops, they've pushed the development of trackpads. The problem with a desktop is that its a box with a CPU, RAM and mass storage in it: its a mature product and there's not a lot to do with it.

3D printing is there fore the taking, and having the right technology to play with it and dominate the market is still to be seen.

3D printing for the consumer is a solution looking for a problem. (Industrial uses such as rapid prototyping are another matter - but that's not really Apple's market) The main consumer market is the niche of 'makers' who are just as likely to want to build their own printer.

The other future Mac line is the portable hybrid like the recent Surface Pro models, and so on...

Apple is not Microsoft: Apple has a successful tablet platform - with a huge body of successful, tablet-optimised apps - that is hugely successful on its own. Microsoft has struggled to create a successful tablet platform and doesn't have a huge range of tablet apps: their only success has come with making hybrid tablets that can run 'proper' Windows applications. Hybrid may be the only way to go for Microsoft, but tight integration between iOS and OSX ('Handoff' etc) might be the more productive route for Apple. At the end of the day, its more profitable to sell people a tablet and a laptop if you can - and if that means that the tablet and laptop are better tools for their respective jobs, all the better.
 
There's a lot of sense in these last posts. Buy and enjoy tech from any company, but company worship is ridiculous. Apple is not infallable and people spinning everything to try and make them seem so just make them hard to believe.

Funny how ifixit should be dismissed for one thing they have paid for yet a person so obsessed with a company they spin everything to make said company appear perfect should be paid attention to. Seriously.
 
Unfortunately, the main "innovation" over the last several years has been the revelation that the vast majority of computer users would prefer a laptop or tablet to a desktop. I'd say Apple have been doing well at driving the development of laptops: they've popularised retina displays when the rest of the world thought 1080p was enough, they've popularised SSD-only laptops, they've pushed the development of trackpads. The problem with a desktop is that its a box with a CPU, RAM and mass storage in it: its a mature product and there's not a lot to do with it.

they have the best trackpads i have used bar none. but higher resolution and faster hard drives is a natural progression just as faster chips.
 
Last edited:
As someone whose lived / worked with smaller iMacs for many years now, this is so sad. :( I almost regret canceling my 21.5" orders a few weeks ago as the lightbulb has gone on that older Apple tech may not be such a bad thing any more. Ah well.

I'll ride on my 2010's fumes as long as it will let me...:cool:
 
Well, when I originally railed on iFixit for their actions, my post had 220 likes, so I think maybe a handful of people actually do agree with giving a side-eye to a business that seems to be untrustworthy. But don't let that stop you from trying to make a childish personal attack against me if that makes you feel taller or something.

You got 220 likes on a website dedicated to Mac with around 100,000 people on it. Your wit and logic are much to profound for the rabble here

It seems your reaction to that situation is a serious overreaction. Breaking that NDA isn't a blanket indictment of iFixit's level of honesty. Sorry, that's just not how the world works. 1 issue and your dead to me?:rolleyes: We're all adults here; some more jaded than others, but if 100% complete honesty was a condition of being in the business world there wouldn't be many businesses around.

Hey he got 220 likes.
 
At least we have a P3 monitor...DCI-P3 has been the standard in movie theaters for years now (2K & 4K). ...Next up: UHD standards set this summer allow for Rec2020, but, that takes OLEDS or something new to actually see it.
 
That is a good point. How can we trust their repairability scores anymore after that NDA breaking stunt and after blaming iOS9 for ifixit's lazinesses to keep their apps updated.
Really? You can't figure out for yourself, after reading the details of the tear-down, that the device is basically unrepairable, non-upgradeable, and sealed shut and figure it out for yourself? Who cares about some score? If it was 3, or 5, or 7 would that make a difference? At what number do you say "Hey, I can fix that myself!"??

Big deal about the NDA. Who cares? It rates right below Hillary Clinton's email server debacle.
 
No. The hard drive is not soldered. The SSD is.
I wonder, assuming you can pry the thing open, if you could replace the 5400RPM HDD with a 2.5" SSD? I wonder if there will be fan issues like most previous Mac models?
 
i happen to own two late 2006 imacs that are perfectly fine yet for the simple reason that the latest itunes dosent work on sl that means those machines wont work with the newest ios devices. one stinking program that does nothing but sync various kinds of files.
My early 2006 iMac is a workhorse, changed the original 256 gb hd in 2010 due to a hd failure.
Same problem as yours with iTunes and SL, plus, as it is only 32bit, I can't update Chrome and its Flash plugin.
But it does almost everything of basic family needs.
My behaviour with this and other macs make me a bad customer for Apple. But this new Apple trend (new...it's something that I've noticed in the last 3/4 years, so after 28 years of using Apple computers it's relatively new) is leaving me a bad feeling. I stopped suggesting Apple computers to friends, everytime it takes a longer time to explain the convenience
 
Isn't this the same iFixit that lied and broke their NDA in order to get advertising clicks, and then tried to blame their lazily-ignored and non-updated app on Apple's software and accused iOS of having bugs which broke it? Sorry, but I am forced to give them a respectability score of 1 out of 10, which means whatever trust I had in their opinion is extremely difficult to repair.
No, it’s a different one. There are loads of them around you know.
 
"Apple has also removed the empty PCIe SSD slot that was featured in the late 2013 iMac, which means that do-it-yourself upgraders won't be able to upgrade their machine easily." "...iFixit notes that users who want to add a Fusion Drive will either have to configure it at purchase or solder it on themselves."

Solder a hard drive? Are you fricking kidding me? Just when we thought the 5400rpm fiasco couldn't get any worse, wow just wow.
Nobody, especially Apple, is asking anyone to actually do that. The argument used is reductio ad absurdum, and you took the bait.
 
My early 2006 iMac is a workhorse, changed the original 256 gb hd in 2010 due to a hd failure.
Same problem as yours with iTunes and SL, plus, as it is only 32bit, I can't update Chrome and its Flash plugin.
But it does almost everything of basic family needs.
My behaviour with this and other macs make me a bad customer for Apple. But this new Apple trend (new...it's something that I've noticed in the last 3/4 years, so after 28 years of using Apple computers it's relatively new) is leaving me a bad feeling. I stopped suggesting Apple computers to friends, everytime it takes a longer time to explain the convenience
That. Is exacly where I am.
Whilst I’ll still recommend to family as I’m adept enough to get around a lot of the Apple roadblocks. When I mention to friends, (actually did just yesterday about the new iMac), I point them to this website, iFixit and Anandtech and tell them buyer beware at the end.

Yeah you may say but it's more reliable, not sure about that personally, and gets better performance, the difference isn’t as big as going SSD instead of 5400RPM……
It’s better for them to have a computer that has some degree of repairability.
Remember Applecare is a glorified extended warranty which are those things that would surely be slated heavily if it were the chaps at PC World that were offering you one. It also makes your new Mac at least £139 more expensive.
Apple also shout about being green. I mean really? When you have to bin the whole computer if it goes wrong.

I’ve had two spinners and one SSD go south on me during my time with Macs. If these were soldered in I’d have been as pissed as hell.
 
  • Like
Reactions: alvindarkness
My early 2006 iMac is a workhorse, changed the original 256 gb hd in 2010 due to a hd failure.
Same problem as yours with iTunes and SL, plus, as it is only 32bit, I can't update Chrome and its Flash plugin.
But it does almost everything of basic family needs.
My behaviour with this and other macs make me a bad customer for Apple. But this new Apple trend (new...it's something that I've noticed in the last 3/4 years, so after 28 years of using Apple computers it's relatively new) is leaving me a bad feeling. I stopped suggesting Apple computers to friends, everytime it takes a longer time to explain the convenience

neither of these are my main machines. one is unused and the is used by my sister although its on 10.5 due to how ical works.

but what is the last chrome version for sl?
 
Isn't this the same iFixit that lied and broke their NDA in order to get advertising clicks, and then tried to blame their lazily-ignored and non-updated app on Apple's software and accused iOS of having bugs which broke it? Sorry, but I am forced to give them a respectability score of 1 out of 10, which means whatever trust I had in their opinion is extremely difficult to repair.
Isn't this the same Apple that has just been fined over two hundred million dollars for stealing technology from an American university for use in their Chinese built hardware? What respectability score do you give Apple, knowing that?
 
neither of these are my main machines. one is unused and the is used by my sister although its on 10.5 due to how ical works.

but what is the last chrome version for sl?
I'm sorry I'm not able to answer you at the moment, I am in another location. I guess it was Chrome 39 (64bit) not supported due to obsolete hardware Intel Core Duo.
PS It is not my main machine too, it stays in the corner and gets handy for Music libraries, syncs with older iDevices, iPod for daughters etc.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.