i am interested to see how the prices fall for the imac line. apple really doesn't have a quality high end consumer desktop and an imac G5 would be interesting fit in that picture.
MhzDoesMatter said:<cough>emac<cough>
-hertz
QCassidy352 said:the only thing is, the imac is a consumer product, and WWDC is a developer's conference. Powermacs and displays for sure (yes, displays! That's what I'm waiting for!), but I dunno about the imac... that would be a lot of hardware announcements.
Maybe so but imac cant linger and go sour forever with 1.25 G4, i myself think this was supposed to happen sooner but since the 970fx pushed back powermac they couldnt release imac G5 until powermac was bumped up so here we are. Bump up the powermacs and say hello to Imac G5,cordless keyboard,mouse,mic and multicolor case wrapped around a 2.0 G5 and 9700 video card.( it could happen)QCassidy352 said:the only thing is, the imac is a consumer product, and WWDC is a developer's conference. Powermacs and displays for sure (yes, displays! That's what I'm waiting for!), but I dunno about the imac... that would be a lot of hardware announcements.
LaMerVipere said:Umm, because the iMac G4 form factor and internal hardware has remained pretty much unchanged since its inception. It's not the all-in-one philosophy that's killed it, it's the performance and outdated hardware offerings coupled with a high price tag.
suzerain said:I don't understand why apple expects that all consumer-level people wish to upgrade their monitors and computers at the same time. Me, I tend to upgrade my CPUs about 2x or 3x more than my monitors; therefore, I would never buy an iMac with a built-in screen (because then I'm stuck with that monitor in the event I want to upgrade).
Lancetx said:The eMac is very underappreciated around here if you ask me...![]()
LaMerVipere said:I am very skeptical of the idea that Apple would ever release a headless iMac. At least, it wouldn't fall under the iMac banner, it would be re-branded as some new piece of hardware. The entire concept of the iMac is the all-in-one philosophy, and for consumers, this fits the vast majority of them quite well.
Apple made a headless iMac once, it was called the Cube, and we all see how well that turned out. But the current constraints when dealing with available hardware, the current computer hardware market, and pricing don't seem to spell well for a headless iMac/revamped cube concept. It would either be too expensive or not powerful enough.
Just my 2¢![]()
QCassidy352 said:the only thing is, the imac is a consumer product, and WWDC is a developer's conference. Powermacs and displays for sure (yes, displays! That's what I'm waiting for!), but I dunno about the imac... that would be a lot of hardware announcements.
the colors maybe. headless???? NOsilvergunuk said:I have a really strong feeling that the imac3 will look like a G4 cube with alot of glass and white in appearance (no sh*t). Plus it'll come in colours that match the ipod minis. The screen will be seperate from the machine.
Would be nice if that new board we saw was part of the new consumer mini tower...rdowns said:First off, a headless iMac is an oxymoron as an iMac is an all-in-one.
Second, Apple never mad a "headless" iMac. An iMac is targeted at consumers (albeit the high end). The Cube was not a consumer model. It was a beautiful, over priced "pro" machine.
Third, I think Apple would sell millions of a small form factor tower. Single processor, 1 PCI slot, upgradeable video. Won't happen though. They are afraid of canibalizing PM sales and also don't want to lose the margin in monitor sales as many would opt for third party, less expensive LCDs.
Fourth, I am so buying a G5 iMac. Want the fastest chip in a 17" LCD. Will buy 20" if they force me. Knowing Apple, the bastards will put the fastest chip only in the 20".
suzerain said:(3) How can you convince Windows users to switch from their cheap-assed Dells, especially when they all already have perfectly serviceable monitors that they could re-use?
Finiksa said:Not a chance, Jonathan Ive has stated previously why Apple didn't go for this design with the original G4 iMac. Hard drives and optical drives need to be installed at right angles, poor cooling and most importantly it would look fugly. The iMac is a consumer machine it isn't meant to be upgradeable, if you need that get a Power Mac.
swissmann said:I've been tracking the display rumors for about a year now. Badly needed updates in my opinion. G5 PowerMac better make the 3 GHz mark times 2 at least or dazzle us all with 4 processors (and running quieter than current models). I would love to see a G5 iMac but the price has to stay low, or the G4 things need to drop significantly. If the eMac with Superdrive dropped to about $700 I would probably buy 3 for my business. What really needs to happen is introduce a computer with all the specs of the current eMac minus the display for a price range of $500 to $800 and then offer bundle prices of core apps like Office for cheap. It is the only way to get the zillions of low end computer users to switch and realize the potential of a real computer to upgrade to a more powerful (expensive mac) in the future. I know my wishes are probably way off the mark but remain what I wish would happen. I would buy a 20" monitor at $900. A G5 Powermac at 4x3 GHz. 3 Headless eMacs at $500. A Powerbook with at least a 1.6 G5. If none of these things happen I will stick with what I currently have.
jettredmont said:True, but the flip side of that is, Gorgeous Mac + Crappy Dell Monitor = Poor Image + Sore Eyes = Crappy experience. The monitor is *the* most important piece of the computer; in consumer land where monitors are treated as commodities, maybe it's not all that bad a thing to force Joe Sixpack to retire the 10-year-old strobe box CRT and give his eyes a rest ...
Granted, the opposite argument is that some people actually buy quality monitors to start with, and can't use them with their iMacs ... but that's why god invented PowerMacs ...![]()
jocknerd said:Get off your high horse dude. You better hope Apple makes a consumer line that is actually liked by the consumers or else Apple's market share will continue to drop. Consumers drive the market not professionals. And if Apple actually made a consumer friendly computer they might actually gain a little market share. Having an all in one machine with limited upgradeability and charging twice as much for it doesn't sit well with the lowly consumers.
jocknerd said:I agree totally with everything you are saying. Consumers don't want an all in one computer. They want a headless machine that they can use with their existing monitor. They want to know that if their monitor fails, they can replace it with another one.
Dixon Ticonderoga has a decent low tech modeling/rendering package available to help you get your point across.ClimbingTheLog said:Somebody should recommend a decent freeware modeling/rendering package to me so I don't prattle on so much.
ClimbingTheLog said:Yeah, some do, some don't.
Imagine an iMac, made from two geometric shapes, each cast in solid brushed aluminum - an 8x8x1" thick square plane base upon which sits a 6" sphere. Glowing Apple in the front of the sphere, of course.
The top of the sphere has a 1" round trap door into which slides a mast for the adjustable LCD monitor. If you want a headless iMac, use the VGA or DVI port on the back of the base. If you want a simple all-in-one, buy the integrated screen option - the panel simply snaps into the top of the sphere, the integrated video/airport connector locks everything in place. The back of the sphere has a simple release button (with Kensington security latch, of course) for easy portabiliy.
Inside the base is the motherboard, with connectors on the back. The sphere serves as both a monitor base and a heatsink. With so much metal involved no fans are necessary to cool the 1.8GHz G5.
Somebody should recommend a decent freeware modeling/rendering package to me so I don't prattle on so much.