Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Playing old games that require a CD inserted to run. And there's no way to rip the contents of the CD into an ISO, because the game still would refuse to run. And even for the ripping process I need a secondary computer or external optical drive… And finally, just for playing old games, buying a detachable peripheral would be too much.
How many games for Mac require a CD inserted to run? If the games are old enough, wouldn't a virtual drive app easily get around the obsolete copy protection? And what is wrong with external optical drives for the few people who really need them?
 
If DVD is a dead medium why is Redbox flourishing?
If DVD is a dead medium why do my customers demand I put their films on it?
If DVD is a dead medium why are their sales doing great?
If DVD is a dead medium why doesn't the rest of the world know it?
If DVD is a dead medium why are the newest movies still released on it?

I know, maybe because only Apple fanboys think it is. If the new Mac Pro's don't include an optical drive I'm getting out of the damn sandbox. I'm sick of paying more for less.

We're totaly on the same page! Thx for clearing that up!
 
Did you ever uploaded a file bigger than 2GB? Takes ages... And I can't ask my clients to download these kind of files.

For professional usage an optical drive is very much appreciated. For old back-ups, input from outside the "apple cloud", fast and cheap sharing of data and no external hardware and/or cables needed.

I understand the choise to leave teh floppy drive because of the alternatives those days. Right now, nothing beats a DVD for me.
I don't know what your professional usage is. But as a client of almost any service, I would much rather get the bits I want by downloading them instead of optical disks that are subject to delivery (time/cost), breaking (physically), loss (too much stuff).

2GB is not much. I download games of steam that can be up to 14GB.

At least in my country 10/10Mbps or so broadband is pretty much standard.
 
I hope its true

Sick and tired of the abuse I get when I say that the iMac would be updated with Haswell. Some idiots on the forum keep insisting, no, Apple won't do it until Broadwell since Haswell is just for laptops and battery life improvements.

Oh please, its a processor update, of course they can update without affecting the design. Those who keep saying it won't be updated until Q4 or next year Broadwell are just hurt because their late 2012/early 2013 models will be out of date so soon.
 
I don't understand... I only need an optical drive when I'm forced to stick with that slow, bulky, inferior format. CD's and DVD's are like VHS tapes. I don't want to deal with them unless there's something mighty precious on them. Not only are the bulky, they make noise too. And those spin-up times.

What's confusing me is that you imply that optical discs are essential for 2 GB file storage, lol. An USB 3.0 stick with 64 GB is like... really cheap. With a typical equivalent reading speed of "17x" (DVD) or "5x" (Blu-ray).

What magical world do you live in? :rolleyes:

€99.99
€74.99
€99.99
 
Who needs an optical drive? Well.... I do for sure. An all-in-one isn't complete without opitcal drive. As long as there isn't any alternative for files larger than 2 GB this machine is limp.

IMO

How much does an external optical drive cost ? 30 $ ? 40 $
 
How much does an external optical drive cost ? 30 $ ? 40 $

It's not the cost, it is all about the footprint.

You can't have a magical, even slimmer OSX device if you put brick inside it, like the current PC's from Windows stable.
 
You've got no idea about what I realize or not.





The only statement I want to make is that the iMac isn't an all-in-one anymore. And that I personaly miss the optical drive. Outside the "Apple bubble" we all live in, this isn't something conservative but realistic and practical.



A DVD costs $0,10 that's something you can give away. That doesn't work for flash drives.

But hey, I don't want you all to doubt Apple's vision!

Most people return flash drives and even it they don't they are around $8.00. A cost you should easily be able to pass on. DVD drives are quickly becoming a thing of the past...
 
It's not the cost, it is all about the footprint.

You can't have a magical, even slimmer OSX device if you put brick inside it, like the current PC's from Windows stable.

The MacBook on stick doesn't need to be slimmer. I don't recall people asking for it to be slimmer though I do recall people complaining about a lack of an optical drive, lack of user serviceable RAM, and that it was glued together.
 
It's not the cost, it is all about the footprint.

You can't have a magical, even slimmer OSX device if you put brick inside it, like the current PC's from Windows stable.

But the the iMac is a DESKTOP! Your not exactly going to carry it around with you, are you? :rolleyes:

A desktop should have user serviceable RAM and some legacy ports or hardware that isn't include with laptops because of weight or power etc. e.g. a DVD drive.
 
And finally, just for playing old games, buying a detachable peripheral would be too much.


There are many decent slim external DVD drives for $15-$20. If you want to splurge for quality it bumps you up to $30. These are normal prices on Amazon or Newegg too. At least a few times per year the prices on the nice drives drop into the <$20 range. Yes, it's $20 but if you are intent on playing old games that require the disc in drive, an extra $20 is nothing when compared to the cost of a $1500 - $2500 iMac or MacBook *.

----------

How much does an external optical drive cost ? 30 $ ? 40 $

Edit: Merged posts. See above. If you want one for occasional use, get a sub-$20 one. If you use one a lot, splurge for the $30 one.

If people are worried about desk clutter, then put the drive in a drawer until needed.

I use the optical drive in my MacBook Pro but in the 1.5 years that I've had my computer I've used the drive less than 10 times (and most of those uses were installing Windows and some particular Windows programs under BootCamp).
 
40 million people or more own a blu-ray player and that number is growing. Some people want a physical media they can take and play at someone's house or put on a shelf and collected, why is this concept so unattractive to Apple freaks AND more importantly why is the thinest design more important than the most functionality? Last years iMacs with the slot loaded drives weren't ugly. What is ugly is another external drive with a cord draped on my desk. I received a prospectus in the mail. Guess what: it was on DVD! "Earth to Jonny Ives...Earth to Jonny Ives... DVD still exists." If he wasn't so pudgy I would swear that guy was obsessed with anorexia
 
Agreed and look at all the angry iPad 3 owners that resulted in such a refresh.

You must be basing that on the half dozen or so dorks who posted on Macrumors. Not a fair assessment of the general populace. I would guess that almost none of the millions of housewives, high school kids, hipsters and business people who bought one thought about it at all.
 
Last edited:
haswell in imac..not too much difference,but maybe will put the latest GPU from NVIDIA believe 780M right?
 
I'd be happy if they let the late 2012 iMacs upgrade the WiFi. That's something I'd be more then happy to pay for.

With faster and faster in-home internet faster wifi is a must. I guess I can always go the USB3 route....
 
if i have an internet of 50mbs/s and now with my iMac wifi, i have download aprox 24-25mbs...with the new wifi ac i will be able to reach that 50mbs ?

the app store saiys "well be beack soon" so MACS ARE ON THE WAY
 
you dont have to buy apple product. They always are a step ahead of what is coming next years to all the brands. So if you want an apple product buy an external optical drive, if not you can buy all in one from other brands
 
Did you ever uploaded a file bigger than 2GB? Takes ages... And I can't ask my clients to download these kind of files.

For professional usage an optical drive is very much appreciated. For old back-ups, input from outside the "apple cloud", fast and cheap sharing of data and no external hardware and/or cables needed.

I understand the choise to leave teh floppy drive because of the alternatives those days. Right now, nothing beats a DVD for me.

You can get an external DVD drive, but Apple seems to have decided that the majority of iMac buyers do not need a DVD drive. For me, it takes longer to burn 2GB than it does to upload it, I think.

Oh yeah, you also run the risk of a disc getting stuck in the ridiculous iMac slot-loading optical drive. I had a disc stuck in my 2006 iMac for TWO YEARS. It was trying to eject it constantly. One day, it just popped out.
 
Who needs an optical drive? Well.... I do for sure. An all-in-one isn't complete without opitcal drive. As long as there isn't any alternative for files larger than 2 GB this machine is limp.

IMO
Presuming this machine has the same ports as the the late 2012 model, I would be looking at the Sonnet Dock which has an optical drive and room for a disk inside. And of course add more USB ports. More importantly, it would add a FireWire port which I still have uses for.

In truth having the optical drive being external is a good thing. In this case it would be tray loading which is more forgiving of bad discs. And also I could see the tray where the disc is going in instead of a slot that you have to insert the disc by feel.

...
the app store saiys "well be beack soon" so MACS ARE ON THE WAY
I presume you meant Apple and not App. Anyway, it means something is getting updated. We won't know until it's back up.

Although I do agree that an update to at least one Mac line is probable.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.