Probably because both displays are not calibrated. The LG is also known to have better color saturation than the Samsung display.Why is it that the LG seem to show more detail in the panel then the Samsung in that Youtube video?
Probably because both displays are not calibrated. The LG is also known to have better color saturation than the Samsung display.Why is it that the LG seem to show more detail in the panel then the Samsung in that Youtube video?
Probably because both displays are not calibrated. The LG is also known to have better color saturation than the Samsung display.
So why is it that everyone wants the Samsung when it has problems too?
I mean LG panels have issues but if they don't. (I can be wrong) but wouldn't LG look better when its first turned on? Compared to a Samsung panel?
Having owned an LG display and swapped for a Samsung, I can say that they both actually look the same.
Samsung is brighter, if anything.
Having owned an LG display and swapped for a Samsung, I can say that they both actually look the same.
Samsung is brighter, if anything.
got my LG (IR after 3 months) replaced with a Samsung, after calibrating to my likings... have to say it´s one of if not THE best screen I´ve used...
supersharp and easy on the eyes in the dark <- thats what make a good monitor
Oh yea I keep hearing LG is brighter on this forum...mmm this is something to consider!
I was wondering can you request a Samsung panel when you order online on the apple site for a 15" RMBP?
My LG screen model number is DCN2404031JF49JA5 on MCPr 15"
I have done extensive IR tests and have found no visible IR problems.
I thought some positive LG feedback would be well received!
how long have you had this machine? image retention takes months to show sometimes.
I got it on 17 Dec so not long.
I use my MBPr for 3D modelling, video production, photography and graphics so it's already had a hammering, I have also contacted Apple Business and they have said if it appears they will fix it so no problem if it does appear really!
ok inshallah it wont show up ;-)
I have just noticed that the illuminated Apple logo on the back of the screen is a very light pink, in comparison to the white Apple logo on my wife's MacBook Air, could this be the start of Image Retention!?
I have just noticed that the illuminated Apple logo on the back of the screen is a very light pink, in comparison to the white Apple logo on my wife's MacBook Air, could this be the start of Image Retention!?
Red light is weaker than green or blue (less penetrating), so less red can slip through compared to green or blue. Since the pixel density of the Retina display is higher, the effect is even more pronounced. That's why Apple had to increase red light from the backlight unit in order to make the display more uniform.
No, but I believe that if your Mac has image retention, you can bring it into Apple and they'll replace the screen with a Samsung panel.
How do they increase the red light in the backlight? The backlight was supposed to be a uniform white light.. no?
How can you be sure that they do the replacements with only Samsung?
Because I brought my Mac in for a display replacement, and I got a Samsung display back that looks and performs exactly like the LG screen that I had earlier. Just minus image retention.
There is no way to guarantee a replacement will be Samsung. Service parts can be both.
Do you know of any report about a display replacement turning out to be LG?
I haven't seen that mentioned anywhere. All replacement reports I've read thus far say Samsung. Plus mine is also a Samsung.
Well, light is actually both a wave and a particle. Or... think of it this way: if you have the right equipment that can "see" the smallest form of a "light", you can actually "count" the amount of each "light color" in a certain light-emitting source.
So all Apple has to do is increase the amount of red light that the backlight emits. It's not that hard to do. You've seen red, green, blue, yellow, etc... LED lights, right? They use the same principle here.
By the way, it appears pink-ish or purple-ish because they don't just need red light. They need some amount of green and blue light as well.
Because I brought my Mac in for a display replacement, and I got a Samsung display back that looks and performs exactly like the LG screen that I had earlier. Just minus image retention.
Service parts can be either. And I don't believe I've read any on MR since I got bored of reading the trolling in the IR threads, but I've certainly seen LG service part retina displays myself.
From what I've seen, it's about 2/3 weighted in favour of Samsung, which is the opposite of retail units (which is odd). Since they're probably still new displays (I doubt they can refurb them yet) the service part units will come from the same supply chain as retail devices.
I got it on 17 Dec so not long.
I use my MBPr for 3D modelling, video production, photography and graphics so it's already had a hammering, I have also contacted Apple Business and they have said if it appears they will fix it so no problem if it does appear really!
Loads of bullcrap.
Hundreds of devices like iPads and iPhones all use IPS displays. iMacs and Thunderbolt displays. Heard widespread reports of image burn-in? Didn't think so.
Care try your BS again?
My iPad 2 has IR
Seen and tested 2x iPad 4s.
First had IR and a strange light banding (like light bleeding in middle of screen)
Second has no IR.
So again, another display lottery.
Nothing new, iPad 3s had a far worse display lottery.