Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
An unfortunate omission. TVOS could be a great daily driver but leaving that off a 4k HDR Dolby Vision box makes little sense

Audio has historically been the most neglected component for TV when marketing to the masses. It's the weakest link in services like Netflix/Amazon, the weakest link in new TVs(they push 4K, HD but the built in audio gets worst). You can't really demo audio in a best buy on the showroom floor like you can with the picture.

Thing is audio is probably the most critical component in a proper home setup and it's treated the opposite(the visuals get much high priority).
 
Audio has historically been the most neglected component for TV when marketing to the masses. It's the weakest link in services like Netflix/Amazon, the weakest link in new TVs(they push 4K, HD but the built in audio gets worst). You can't really demo audio in a best buy on the showroom floor like you can with the picture.

Thing is audio is probably the most critical component in a proper home setup and it's treated the opposite(the visuals get much high priority).

Indeed. I spent around twice as much on audio gear as I did on the TV. And no, that doesn't include magic cables and speaker wire with fairy dust in them either. Even then I've only got a 5.1 setup, not even Atmos or anything.
 
What is 'Dolby Atmos'? I don't think it's as simple as saying it's surround sound with additional height channels as I've seen 'simple' soundbars and now even laptops touting 'Dolby Atmos' speakers. I'm wondering if Dolby might be allowing people to refer to Dolby Atmos in the same way as Dolby Digital Plus - i.e. can be low bitrate and 2.0 or high bitrate and 7.1 - no guarantees of a certain quality. As mentioned, VUDU yout Dolby Atmos on some of their 4K streams, but I'm fairly certain this isn't the same as you'll get on a UHD Blur Ray disc.
 
What is 'Dolby Atmos'? I don't think it's as simple as saying it's surround sound with additional height channels
It isn't. Basically it's a way to add objects with a location in 3D space that are mapped to your specific speaker setup in realtime by your AVR as you play back the movie. The big advantage is that it can utilize a large variety of different speaker setups, as opposed to just a few fixed channel configurations such as 5.1 and 7.1. For example, you can (but don't have to) use overhead speakers. The more speakers you have, the more accurately the positions of the objects can be rendered.
as I've seen 'simple' soundbars and now even laptops touting 'Dolby Atmos' speakers.
As mentioned above, Atmos does not necessarily require a specific speaker configuration. These Atmos soundbars typically have upward-firing speakers that simulate ceiling speakers by bouncing the sound off the ceiling.
I'm wondering if Dolby might be allowing people to refer to Dolby Atmos in the same way as Dolby Digital Plus - i.e. can be low bitrate and 2.0 or high bitrate and 7.1 - no guarantees of a certain quality.
You're quite correct. Atmos doesn't say anything about the audio compression. It just refers to the object-based spacial encoding.
 
VUDU yout Dolby Atmos on some of their 4K streams, but I'm fairly certain this isn't the same as you'll get on a UHD Blur Ray disc.
It isn't. Atmos from streaming sources is data on top of Dolby Digital+ so it's lossy. On discs it will be on top of Dolby TrueHD so it will be lossless.
[doublepost=1505344486][/doublepost]
What server and client software are you using?
I use plex for this on all my devices. Very easy to use.
 
Atmos and DTS X are the most over rated and over hyped thing in HT, 5.1 or 7.1 is just as good imo
I don't know about X for 5.1, but my receiver only has PLII for matrix, so the DTS Neo in my Samsung TV works great to pass stereo tracks through.
 
Agree. Not surprised about hd audio for streaming content. Also I would would not think Apple would necessarily publish if it can or can't bitstream hd audio as the use for this is primarily those of us that rip our blu rays. Atv 4 hardware can actually bitstream dts and DD untouched using infuse. Infuse can play hd audio but that has to be decoded by infuse first and sent as lcpm hence no Atmos metadata. So still keeping fingers crossed that this hardware can actually bitstream hd audio. That being said Plex (what I use) uses native atv player so may still need to use something like infuse.

Many iTunes title are in fact DD+. Only way to get it is streaming through ATV. Since atv will decode to LPCM only way to know is to see that your avr is inputting pcm/multichannel at 7.1 as plain DD only supports up to 5.1.
I will have to check out Infuse and Plex.

I did not know this about DD+/iTunes...whenever I rent or purchase iTunes movies/TV, I prefer to download to my Mac and then I don't have to stream it, but, use home sharing to play it on my ATV from my Mac, (I don't have the best internet ATM), and I still prefer to use my Mac to find them, so, there I only see DD 5.1.
Someone may have pointed it out already but Atmos can ride along via DD+. HD audio is not required. Roku supports it. Vizio even has it working over ARC. They could certainly support DD+ via streaming over HDMI.
I did, but, it was in the middle of other stuff I wrote. I saw that VUDU was already doing DD+ Atmos a couple years ago or so. So, yeah, Atmos does work over DD+, except, ATV implementation of audio... (see below)
That is the hope although you would think it would be mentioned in specs that it supports Atmos. They would still need to change how ATV handles audio as Atmos metadata requires bitstreaming of DD+ which ATV4 currently does not do - it decodes and sends as LCPM which would loose Atmos metadata.
ah, I get it, this sucks :p (Also explains why my AVR shows PCM instead of DD or DD+.)
I wouldn't expect Apple to provide Atmos support until it was clear Atmos was going to take off in the home theater market...

I would prefer Apple spend their efforts improving sound quality in general.
Atmos is taking off, especially with the new UHD blu-rays, and in AVRs.

Well, about the only thing they can do is allow for bypass of audio so our AVRs can handle decoding. No VOD or streaming service is going to do lossless audio with video until we get much higher internet speeds (on the low end, not what the wealthiest can buy). This is why I still prefer blu-ray discs, much higher quality audio, and video (no color banding or noise caused from compression).
More like 2-3Mbps (depends on the content though).
Most streaming providers use DD+ in low-bitrate mode (typically a few hundred kbps).
Actually many iTunes movies have 7.1 DD+ tracks now. You only get them when streaming them from the Internet via an ATV4 though. The downloaded version typically has a DD 5.1 track at 384kbps (probably for backward compatibility with the ATV3, which can't play DD+ via Homesharing).
Sorry, but, no, LPCM, DTS-MA (& X) and Dolby True HD (& Atmos) lossless run much higher, with a maximum of 18-24Mbs, which is why you only find them on Blu-ray discs. DD 5.1 (AC3) typically runs at 640kbs on blu-rays, but can run at 448kbs (DVD max), or 192kbs for 2.0 channels (384 is the MP3 rate, and the max for Laserdiscs). while DD+ (E-AC3/EC3) should be running at a higher bitrate than that, typically 1.7Mbs, it maxes out at 6.1Mbs, depending on number of channels and sample rate. Although, DD+ can run at lower rates, so, for streaming, you may be correct, depending on source, but, DD+ is supposedly a better compression than DD, (or at least more flexible). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolby_Digital
What is 'Dolby Atmos'? I don't think it's as simple as saying it's surround sound with additional height channels as I've seen 'simple' soundbars and now even laptops touting 'Dolby Atmos' speakers. I'm wondering if Dolby might be allowing people to refer to Dolby Atmos in the same way as Dolby Digital Plus - i.e. can be low bitrate and 2.0 or high bitrate and 7.1 - no guarantees of a certain quality. As mentioned, VUDU yout Dolby Atmos on some of their 4K streams, but I'm fairly certain this isn't the same as you'll get on a UHD Blur Ray disc.
Atmos is object oriented audio, rather than balancing sound into specific channels, sound objects have an axis they can be moved through. A proper home configuration would include 2 or 4 ceiling speakers or speakers pointed at an up angle to bounce off the ceiling. Sound bars or laptops with Dolby Atmos, might be decoding it, but, not sure how it's implemented, gimmick. While DTS-X touts itself to be able to work with 2.1 or more speakers, I doubt the effect is anything more than "virtual". Both do have headphone versions, not sure how that works without extra speakers, but, whatever (I think it might be psychological.:p). Here is a basic description, but, there are better reads on it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolby_Atmos
https://www.dolby.com/us/en/brands/dolby-atmos.html
 
Sorry, but, no, LPCM, DTS-MA (& X) and Dolby True HD (& Atmos) lossless run much higher, with a maximum of 18-24Mbs, which is why you only find them on Blu-ray discs.
Of course PCM is higher, but you were talking about compressed formats like DTS-HD MA. As an example, here's the BDInfo scan of the 2012 Blu-ray release "The Amazing Spiderman" which has DTS-HD MA and a number of DD tracks for comparison:

DISC INFO:

Disc Title: AMAZING_SPIDERMAN
Disc Size: 43,307,237,336 bytes
Protection: AACS
BD-Java: Yes
BDInfo: 0.5.8

PLAYLIST REPORT:

Name: 00001.MPLS
Length: 2:16:17.169 (h:m:s.ms)
Size: 38,671,607,808 bytes
Total Bitrate: 37.83 Mbps

VIDEO:

Codec Bitrate Description
----- ------- -----------
MPEG-4 AVC Video 25393 kbps 1080p / 23.976 fps / 16:9 / High Profile 4.1

AUDIO:

Codec Language Bitrate Description
----- -------- ------- -----------
DTS-HD Master Audio English 2321 kbps 5.1 / 48 kHz / 2321 kbps / 16-bit (DTS Core: 5.1 / 48 kHz / 1509 kbps / 16-bit)
Dolby Digital Audio English 192 kbps 2.0 / 48 kHz / 192 kbps / Dolby Surround
DTS-HD Master Audio French 2331 kbps 5.1 / 48 kHz / 2331 kbps / 16-bit (DTS Core: 5.1 / 48 kHz / 1509 kbps / 16-bit)
Dolby Digital Audio Chinese 640 kbps 5.1 / 48 kHz / 640 kbps
DTS-HD Master Audio Portuguese 2331 kbps 5.1 / 48 kHz / 2331 kbps / 16-bit (DTS Core: 5.1 / 48 kHz / 1509 kbps / 16-bit)
Dolby Digital Audio Spanish 640 kbps 5.1 / 48 kHz / 640 kbps
Dolby Digital Audio Thai 640 kbps 5.1 / 48 kHz / 640 kbps
Dolby Digital Audio English 192 kbps 2.0 / 48 kHz / 192 kbps / Dolby Surround
 
Last edited:
I would like to upgrade my receiver but all the speakers are proprietary wireless, I don't think there's anything like it on the market (I don't want to run any cables), and I don't want to deal with getting rid of stuff.

Panasonic should make an updated system and sell the backwards-compatible receiver standalone too.
 
Last edited:
A Dolby true hd or dts hd audio track is about 3gb on my rips. The bitrate is quite low.
Of course PCM is higher, but you were talking about compressed formats like DTS-HD MA. As an example, here's the BDInfo scan of the 2012 Blu-ray release "The Amazing Spiderman" which has DTS-HD MA and a number of DD tracks for comparison:

...

AUDIO:

Codec Language Bitrate Description
----- -------- ------- -----------
DTS-HD Master Audio English 2321 kbps 5.1 / 48 kHz / 2321 kbps / 16-bit (DTS Core: 5.1 / 48 kHz / 1509 kbps / 16-bit)
Dolby Digital Audio English 192 kbps 2.0 / 48 kHz / 192 kbps / Dolby Surround
DTS-HD Master Audio French 2331 kbps 5.1 / 48 kHz / 2331 kbps / 16-bit (DTS Core: 5.1 / 48 kHz / 1509 kbps / 16-bit)
Dolby Digital Audio Chinese 640 kbps 5.1 / 48 kHz / 640 kbps
DTS-HD Master Audio Portuguese 2331 kbps 5.1 / 48 kHz / 2331 kbps / 16-bit (DTS Core: 5.1 / 48 kHz / 1509 kbps / 16-bit)
Dolby Digital Audio Spanish 640 kbps 5.1 / 48 kHz / 640 kbps
Dolby Digital Audio Thai 640 kbps 5.1 / 48 kHz / 640 kbps
Dolby Digital Audio English 192 kbps 2.0 / 48 kHz / 192 kbps / Dolby Surround
Ok, I stand corrected, so, even though lossless audio tops out at 18/24 Mbs, I guess a typical 5.1 track will be 2-3 Mbs. I don't have a unit that shows bitrate for the audio, I would have guessed it was more like 10-12 Mbs for 5.1 and more for 7.1, but, what do I know? Part of my reason for this is because the dynamic range between DD & these HD audio codecs is so obviously greater, especially with the LFE, that, I assumed the bitrate was even higher.

However, I do have to correct a common misconception: DTS-HD MA and Dolby TrueHD are as lossless as LPCM, they are proprietary codecs, but, are not compressed at all. (See AVS Forum for more on this.)

So, the DD+ spec is "...has a number of improvements including support for a wider range of data rates (32 Kbit/s to 6144 Kbit/s), increased channel count and multi-program support (via substreams), and additional tools (algorithms) for representing compressed data and counteracting artifacts." ...so, it can run at 32Kbs, (assuming mono audio?), with a max of 6.1Mbs, but, that would be with either high sampling rates or 15 channels. But, it seems slightly better than DD when I've heard it. (?) In any case, for streaming, I'm sure they would use low bitrates. But, lower bitrates than DD on blu-ray discs seems like it should be lower quality.

Well, so, now I'm wondering why not stream HD audio? It is so much better, not that much more bandwidth required when compared to overall UHD bitrate, and Apple does audio well for music, so why aren't they implementing the best for ATV5? They up the ante on all their other devices, (i.e.: color quality of screens). They seem to be marketing ATV for apps, but, is the higher price for apps and siri control really justified? It should also be the best streamer, right?
 
I'm sure it's been pointed out already, but Netflix is now releasing content in atmos too (although not many devices support it yet, which is frustrating), so it can't be too difficult to do.

I'm still just unclear whether when it is rolled out it will be a matter of an update or require an entirely new Apple TV.
 
Well, so, now I'm wondering why not stream HD audio? It is so much better, not that much more bandwidth required when compared to overall UHD bitrate, and Apple does audio well for music, so why aren't they implementing the best for ATV5? They up the ante on all their other devices, (i.e.: color quality of screens). They seem to be marketing ATV for apps, but, is the higher price for apps and siri control really justified? It should also be the best streamer, right?
That's the million dollar question.
I have a program I can drop my encodes in called mediainfo which gives me info about them including streaming bitrate. My bluray rips with HD audio stream at about the same bitrate as Netflix 1080p movies.
So I really don't stream movies. I rip and encode everything and play them through plex. 1000 movies so far.
 
Ok, I stand corrected, so, even though lossless audio tops out at 18/24 Mbs, I guess a typical 5.1 track will be 2-3 Mbs. I don't have a unit that shows bitrate for the audio, I would have guessed it was more like 10-12 Mbs for 5.1 and more for 7.1, but, what do I know?
For PCM, you can easily calculate the bitrate. For example a 5.1 (i.e. 6 channel) 48KHz/16 Bit track has: 6 * 48000/s * 16 bits = 4608 kbit/s. Encoded with DTS-HD MA or TrueHD it's smaller depending on how compressible the content is.
Part of my reason for this is because the dynamic range between DD & these HD audio codecs is so obviously greater, especially with the LFE, that, I assumed the bitrate was even higher.
DD does not significantly affect dynamic range.
However, I do have to correct a common misconception: DTS-HD MA and Dolby TrueHD are as lossless as LPCM, they are proprietary codecs, but, are not compressed at all. (See AVS Forum for more on this.)
The misconception is on your end: DTS-HD MA and TrueHD are both lossless, but compressed encodings. Saving room and bandwidth compared to PCM is the whole point.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: IronWaffle
Dolby Atmos & DTSX are missing from the audio formats. Hope that's an error or something they can remedy.

What streaming services even have this as an option for 4k content? I think the most streaming apps have is DD. I can maybe see them offering it when you buy a 4k movie but most people seem to be ok with streaming nowadays and that takes a hit on audio. Disc formats always bring true quality to everything. So stand alone 4k blu ray players need to support everything more than a streaming box.
 
Doesn't Vudu support Atmos?
Yes. Dolby Vision too.
And netflix and amazon are rolling it out. I have not checked the other services.

And I rip everything I play it through my streaming devices. The apple TV has many apps that are for local streaming so it's important to support it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: twobelowpar
Looking at Dolby's Atmos documentation (reference 4 on the Wikipedia article) it states that Atmos can be added to a Dolby Digital Plus track (in the same way that it can be added into a Dolby TruHD track) - to me this suggests that Apple may included 'Dolby Atmos' as part of the DD+ stream in the same way as VUDU presumably do. Dolby seems to be pushing DD+ as the solution for streaming and as DD+ is specc'd to reach >6 Mbps it should be able to evolve to match DD TruHD as streaming improves (i.e. the Apple TV supporting DD+ should be capable of supporting Atmos inside DD+ upto 6 Mbps should the studios every decide to deploy it)

It would be good if Apple 'allowed' (or didn't block) HD audio bitstreaming by 3rd party apps like InFuse - but I guess we'll have to wait and see whether that restriction has been lifted in the 4K model (along with the 24 Hz playback support).
 
Looking at Dolby's Atmos documentation (reference 4 on the Wikipedia article) it states that Atmos can be added to a Dolby Digital Plus track (in the same way that it can be added into a Dolby TruHD track) - to me this suggests that Apple may included 'Dolby Atmos' as part of the DD+ stream in the same way as VUDU presumably do. Dolby seems to be pushing DD+ as the solution for streaming and as DD+ is specc'd to reach >6 Mbps it should be able to evolve to match DD TruHD as streaming improves (i.e. the Apple TV supporting DD+ should be capable of supporting Atmos inside DD+ upto 6 Mbps should the studios every decide to deploy it)

It would be good if Apple 'allowed' (or didn't block) HD audio bitstreaming by 3rd party apps like InFuse - but I guess we'll have to wait and see whether that restriction has been lifted in the 4K model (along with the 24 Hz playback support).

A response from Apple was posted elsewhere that it doesn't support 24 Hz.
 
Looking at Dolby's Atmos documentation (reference 4 on the Wikipedia article) it states that Atmos can be added to a Dolby Digital Plus track (in the same way that it can be added into a Dolby TruHD track) - to me this suggests that Apple may included 'Dolby Atmos' as part of the DD+ stream in the same way as VUDU presumably do. Dolby seems to be pushing DD+ as the solution for streaming and as DD+ is specc'd to reach >6 Mbps it should be able to evolve to match DD TruHD as streaming improves (i.e. the Apple TV supporting DD+ should be capable of supporting Atmos inside DD+ upto 6 Mbps should the studios every decide to deploy it)

It would be good if Apple 'allowed' (or didn't block) HD audio bitstreaming by 3rd party apps like InFuse - but I guess we'll have to wait and see whether that restriction has been lifted in the 4K model (along with the 24 Hz playback support).
While DD+ can indeed go over 6Mbps a Dolby TrueHD track, which is lossless, is only 2-3Mbps. I've never understood why it's not part of streaming services.
 
  • Like
Reactions: benji888
While DD+ can indeed go over 6Mbps a Dolby TrueHD track, which is lossless, is only 2-3Mbps. I've never understood why it's not part of streaming services.
One reason is that the bitrates of lossless codecs cannot be tightly controlled. They vary based on the compressibility of the content. In extreme cases (e.g. white noise, which is not compressible at all) the bitrate can spike up to about the full PCM rate. A codec like DD+, on the other hand, allows the provider to configure the bitrate and even scale it up or down dynamically based on the available network bandwidth.
 
One reason is that the bitrates of lossless codecs cannot be tightly controlled. They vary based on the compressibility of the content. In extreme cases (e.g. white noise, which is not compressible at all) the bitrate can spike up to about the full PCM rate. A codec like DD+, on the other hand, allows the provider to configure the bitrate and even scale it up or down dynamically based on the available network bandwidth.
Got it. Thanks for the info.
 
For PCM, you can easily calculate the bitrate. For example a 5.1 (i.e. 6 channel) 48KHz/16 Bit track has: 6 * 48000/s * 16 bits = 4608 kbit/s. Encoded with DTS-HD MA or TrueHD it's smaller depending on how compressible the content is.
DD does not significantly affect dynamic range.
The misconception is on your end: DTS-HD MA and TrueHD are both lossless, but compressed encodings. Saving room and bandwidth compared to PCM is the whole point.
DD does affect dynamic range in such as way as I can hear the difference between the DD track and the lossless track when playing movies. If you can hear the difference then it is significant. Audio compression can affect dynamic range, the "amount" of sound is reduced to save file space.

It can't be both lossless and compressed:
DTS-HD MA & Dolby True HD are lossless, but, use less space than straight LPCM by eliminating "zeros", meaning, they drop the digital bits that have no sound information in them. LPCM has all the data from 20-20000Hz, even if that data is mostly zeros. This is entirely different than compression, which not only drops the "zeros", but also reduces the amount of bits by using an algorithm to determine what sounds the typical human ear won't miss if reduced or deleted. (I don't have link handy for an article on this subject.)
[doublepost=1505405548][/doublepost]
While DD+ can indeed go over 6Mbps a Dolby TrueHD track, which is lossless, is only 2-3Mbps. I've never understood why it's not part of streaming services.
Well, if DD+ is using 6Mbs, then it either has a high sampling rate or 15 channels.

But, the reason 2-3Mbs hasn't been used so far, this would be about half the rate of HD video streaming, so, with HD streaming, 2-3Mbs audio would double the bandwidth required to stream. In the case of UHD needing at least 15Mbs, a 2-3Mbs increase for audio seems nearly negligible considering the benefits. In any case, rural internet can sometimes still be DSL at 10Mbs, so, UHD streaming is not available to all, for sure, (at least here in the USA). (Yes, in some places DSL is the only option. (or, laughably, satellite.)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.