And already understands the world better than most…So, is that kid in Junior High, or...?
And already understands the world better than most…So, is that kid in Junior High, or...?
View it— the methodology and production value are worth it.Thanks for saving me the 7 minutes.
The creator of the video must be celebrating you guys destroying his views Lol
It can certainly be improved with more granular controls but it works well for my needs right now.Nope. I gave it all the time in the world (a year or so) - it's meant for people who just plug in their laptop into power same time each night, not for me. You can easily mess it up by changing your routine for just a few days. Al Dente is so much easier. Also has some nice geeky info about power draw. Great for my needs - most of my days my Mac is plugged in, so I keep it below 70%, and I top it up with one click when I need to.
Also, on my other devices, it also just refuses to work. I always ended the day with more than 50% battery on my Watch so for a while it charged only to 80%.... until it just mysteriously stopped doing that and now it always charges to 100, even though my usage or battery levels haven't changed. Why? Apple only knows. For me, their 'estimates' are simply not reliable.
Because the idiots who fell for the hoax won’t shut up so they put the feature in to stop all the bitching.Almost every device has this option, built it. My Steam Deck. My Switch 2. My Apple devices. And yet, people treat it like it's some kind of hoax.
Apple has access to battery construction and design circuitry that we users don’t have. Maybe their battery on Apple Watch wasn’t as good as they claimed to be and they had to push the charging limit insanely hard to reduce warranty replacements?Why does Apple push the 80% charging limit so hard? I literally cannot shut this off on my AW10 or Ultra2. Even with it disabled on both watches, it still only charges to 80 percent most of the time and I have to have it in nightstand mode to charge it to 100% when I want. It occurs to me that maybe Apple might know something more about batteries and battery life than we do. It is IMPOSSIBLE to get anything useful off of the internet because there is so much conflicting information out there.
I have a 13Mini that I charged the hell out of and it has 84% battery. I’d consider trading in a device with full capacity to be a missed opportunity.Nice, but I am going to follow industry / manufacturer suggestions. I still am rocking a 13 pro with over 80% battery as my work phone, and have turned in my last devices on personal side with 99 - 100% battery health since the 14 pro on.
If it is better to keep between 30 and 80%, then if you don’t need more than 80%, except for during the usual circumstances, at the end of four years, you’ll have more battery power when you do charge it up to 100%. It’s exactly the situation for me and my Apple Watch and phone. If I could only set it manually, it would be a trivial thing to do, no sweat no worry, no algorithm. It’s not really a big deal, it just would be such an easy thing to do manually in Settings, and since it does seem to be better for most lithium batteries across the board, why not just have devices that enable a user to do this? Instead with an Apple Watch version nine I’m subjected to some weird algorithm, and my iPhone 14 Pro has never optimized diddly squat.For sure.
If you limit yourself to 80% then after 4 or 5 years you can avoid a battery that only... has 80% of it's capacity left?
What exactly have you accomplished?
Let's imagine a phone owned for 6 years. One person limits it to 80% and has 80% capacity for 6 years. The other person doesn't limit it at all and ends up with 80% capacity and maybe a smidge under for a year or two?
...I really don't get it. Like genuinely. How is the first scenario not the obviously, clearly, no brainer, no question worse scenario? How is a capacity life of 100, 96, 92, 88, 82, 80 better than a capacity lifetime by year of 80, 80, 80, 80, 80, 80?
Also, on my other devices, it also just refuses to work. I always ended the day with more than 50% battery on my Watch so for a while it charged only to 80%.... until it just mysteriously stopped doing that and now it always charges to 100, even though my usage or battery levels haven't changed. Why? Apple only knows. For me, their 'estimates' are simply not reliable.
I don’t think that is quite right.![]()
Analysis: Does wireless charging wear down your iPhone battery?
We asked readers about their charging habits and the data revealed a surprise.www.macworld.com
Wireless charging has next to zero impact in battery life.
The BAGA crowd (Battery Gains) 🖖😎The 80% crowd isn’t going to like that lol.
It's not only about the need to replace. When you take care of your battery, it will have a higher total capacity (100-0%) after three years. Which means that you will get more capacity (time) out of the phone in case you really need it.If you typically don't need more than 80%, then it could significantly lengthen the time until you drop below 80% and then replace the battery. The experiment shows that the 30-80% iPhone dropped only 8% in the same time the 5-100% iPhone dropped 12%. Extrapolating, this might mean that if the latter drops below 80% after 3-4 years, the former might take 4-6 years with the same usage to drop below 80%. It might make the difference between having and not having to replace the battery before getting a new phone. In addition, on the occasional days where you know you'll need more than 80%, you'll have opportunity to make use of >80% for longer as well. Of course, if you get a new iPhone every other year, it makes less of a difference.
Splutter, splutter, " Well yes, but you can prove anything with data " 🤣The 80% crowd isn’t going to like that lol.
I'm doing 80% charging, only because the 16 PM was an upgrade from the 13's battery. The 16 PM lasts about 24-36 hours on 80% charge for my usecase. If that drops significantly, I have no problem going to 100%. I also charge to 100% during any travel. I'll probably replace the 16 PM before I replace the battery anyway, so in the end it doesn't even matterThe 80% crowd isn’t going to like that lol.
But it's such a small amount, it's really not worth crippling your battery at 80% to prolong its capacity drop to 80%.More than minimally, I would say. The 5-100% iPhone lost 12% capacity, while the 30-80% iPhone lost only 8% capacity. This means the 5-100% iPhone lost battery capacity 50% faster,
Generally solid reasoning but doesn’t acknowledge that (on older iPhones at least) that gradual degradation from 100-80% capacity makes the battery unstable and subject to failure or other misbehaviors in those later years.For sure.
If you limit yourself to 80% then after 4 or 5 years you can avoid a battery that only... has 80% of it's capacity left?
What exactly have you accomplished?
Let's imagine a phone owned for 6 years. One person limits it to 80% and has 80% capacity for 6 years. The other person doesn't limit it at all and ends up with 80% capacity and maybe a smidge under for a year or two?
...I really don't get it. Like genuinely. How is the first scenario not the obviously, clearly, no brainer, no question worse scenario? How is a capacity life of 100, 96, 92, 88, 82, 80 better than a capacity lifetime by year of 80, 80, 80, 80, 80, 80?
wow, just like every other battery test. replace your battery if/when it falls under 80%. otherwise, use your phone as you see fit, folks.
I thumb finger at them by going 10-90% and 5W USB-A slow charge until recently.The 80% crowd isn’t going to like that lol.