Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
"Apple recommends a 6-digit code because it adds one million possible combinations"
Actually, a 6-digit code adds 990,00 additional combinations, making it one million total...

... unless the author of this article was just rounding up, for some reason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JackANSI
I think iOS 9 is eating my 5s battery, that's why I stopped running the beta and rolled back. Now that I've put iOS 9 back on, I think it's sucked up the battery today and I've barely used it. (I had it at 100% after updating, running all the apps [photos, mail, notes, my newsreader, calendar, address book] so I knew it recently refreshed everything and all the apps were all updated while on power.

This is a recently replaced phone from Apple and it's been running great the last two weeks.
Now that I think about it, it's not even the same 5s that I tested the beta on.

I've been using the heck out of it since last week since I just got an Apple Watch and battery life has been good. But today it's spiraled downward.

This is only one day of use, but I feel like it's just how when I ran the beta for a few weeks...

Gary
 
Very disappointed with the low power mode after downloading and installing iOS 9 final.

If Apple claim up to 3 hours of extra battery then how is that up-to-3-hour figure in any way relevant or meaningful to users unless Apple expects at least some of its users to to enable the mode permanently? One thing Apple is pretty good at is only quoting specifications that it thinks are meaningful to users so surely it must anticipate some people switching it on permanently.

I was planning to do just this, enable it permanently, until I discovered that one of the things it does is set auto-lock to 30 seconds with no possibility to change it. For my usage, reading a lot of information-rich content in my phone, that makes my phone virtually unusable if the screen is going to dim every 25 seconds and then cut out 5 seconds later if I don't keep tapping it. It's such a shame because even on my 5 I didn't find any performance worries when I tried using power save mode for a while and I expect my 6s is going to be insanely over-powered for my needs when it arrives. I would have really liked to be able to set power saving to get another 2 hours or so of use out of it and still probably have way more performance than I need.

I've filed a feedback request with Apple requesting that they don't disable the ability to change the auto-lock timer when power save mode is enabled. Maybe they'll listen if enough people complain.
 
"Apple recommends a 6-digit code because it adds one million possible combinations"
Actually, a 6-digit code adds 990,00 additional combinations, making it one million total...

... unless the author of this article was just rounding up, for some reason.

Excuse me! Sir?

You dropped your pocket protector.
 
I am not seeing a reduction on the iOS9 installation size. I have a 16 GB iPhone 5. Capacity is showing 12.5 GB after installing iOS9.

Anyone else seeing this?
This is correct - the quoted 1.3 gigs by Apple is for over the air upgrades.

Once decompressed it will occupied around 4gigs as you have noted.

The benefit will come from apps such as games like real racing 3 that instead of taking 1.4 gig should now take close to half with the app slicing feature.
 
Last edited:
I'm using the build 13A344 9 iOS - iPhone 5s and noticed some errors on my device.

1 - Sounds in all applications are dumb even when iPhone is in normal mode, forcing us to always increase the volume. Affected applications that could include: Instagram, snapchat, Whatsapp, and Videos in the Camera Roll.

2 When it comes to 20% of battery into power enconomia mode. But we're very affected by not having more effect. When opening applications there are always small crashes.

3 When you press and exits from a power saving mode, the effects do not come back and we are required to disconnect and connect the device to the system to work with effects and no crashes as it should.

4- I have airport express and there is incompatibility with airplay, which forced me to turn off the airplay the airport express.

Were mistakes that I found so far. I think when you make a new iOS, you do not think the old appliances always prioritizing releases. This is boring.
 
iPhone 4S: battery sucks big time (6% lost in almost 5 minutes) and performance without Low power mode enabled is awful!
Why Apple engineers don't design software on less capable devices first and move on from there?

Would you design a car based on technology from 1950's?

You design things for the new to entice people to upgrade. You are in business to earn a profit. Not a hobby or non-profit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: agsystems
If I remember correctly, with iOS 8 Low Power Mode ON, it feels almost exactly like iOS 7.
Would you design a car based on technology from 1950's?

You design things for the new to entice people to upgrade. You are in business to earn a profit. Not a hobby or non-profit.
It's a poor analogy that you're making. Read this comment.
By making poor software to sell hardware isn't a really smart move and by having a 4-year old device running well on the latest OS says a lot about the company and its products (software or hardware).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JackANSI
I disagree. I'm an iOS Developer and I know what these devices are capable of.
That's one. Another thing would be that designing software on less performant devices will lead to great performance advantages for more performant ones. Also, who says that designing software for slower devices will impair new or more features for the faster ones? At its core the software must be fast!
This is an idiotic statement. Designing software to run well on an obsolete phone such as the 4S while negating the performance benefits of the 6 and 6S is ludicrous.
 
This is an idiotic statement. Designing software to run well on an obsolete phone such as the 4S while negating the performance benefits of the 6 and 6S is ludicrous.
With all due respect, it's idiotic to create software running well only on the latest tech especially if the software you make has leverage (meaning that its features aren't/shouldn't be too demanding on the processing power) to run well on old hardware! And iOS shouldn't be a processing power hog because except its fancy animations (which a 4S should and could handle without any issues) there really isn't anything there that should strangulate the hardware.

I believe you're not a software developer, because if you were at least a decent one you wouldn't write such stupid comments. But if you are, you should seriously go back to basics and learn how to create not great, but good software.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JackANSI
Highly disappointed that Mr. Cook raised the OS X desktop released date requirements higher than the Windows release date requirement. 2012 vs 2009!
If you don't believe me look it up!
The bottom line is that Mr. Cook lied saying that we could continue to use the same hardware for iOS 9. Nothing should have changed for the OS X users and yes even the Windows users.
 
When iOS is updated indexing occurs and can burn through some cpu. Let that iron out after a few hours and then the battery savings will happen. Promise.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.