Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Makes you wonder. If they’re this desperate to nickel and dime their users and developers, it tells me their hardware sales aren’t quite what they used to be.

Personally I think I’m going to move to Android and Windows when it comes time to upgrade. I’ve been an Apple guy for over 40 years but I’m so disgusted by them these days. The greed is nauseating. And I’ve completely lost respect for them as a company. They’re so hypocritical especially when it comes to China. It’s gross. It wouldn’t bother me if they just kept their mouths shut and did business but the constant moralizing is tiresome, made only worse by their naked hypocrisy when China says “jump”. I just don’t respect Apple at all these days.
You can't leave the walled garden. At least, that's what I keep hearing. You're trapped darn it!! 😂
 
  • Haha
Reactions: deepspacecowboy
Weird how most comments here depict the EU as the villain in the opening stores saga, but now stay quiet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: steve09090
Pretty much, yes.

If you break down all the costs of providing these yoga classes on mobile computing devices,
- renting and/or fitting out and decorating the studio
- providing filming/recording equipment
- recording the event and hosting or streaming it online
…Apple is in no way adding value even near 30% of app/tips.
Except the paying audience?
So?

If I have a video call with my lawyer or tax or investment advisor (whom I pay), should Apple charge a 30% commission on them? The app isn’t doing anything fundamentally different, is it?
Do you have a million people in your FaceTime call on at the same time you're talking to your lawyer, tax/investment agent/advisor? Do you think the few bucks you pay those people would cover the million others also on your call?
 
Was it a sarcasm? Don't we all want to have separate phones for Messaging, Netflix, YouTube, Meditation and whatever else we do with out phones? It looks like some Apple fans would be fine with that. They never use services or apps that are not from Apple anyways, right?
Everything you mentioned has a direct website to use said things. You can purchase any device to get to them. Doesn't have to be Apple's or Androids, or Microsoft's OS.

For the convenience you pay to have it in one device (or another of your choice). Those services support being used on that device. Even then, none of those App's have to go through the AppStore to be useable. You or they can use the web directly to provide the content to you. And they charge you directly without ever paying Apple a dime. Or 1 red US cent.
 
It's only a matter of time before all activity like this is banned. Nothing like this would ever be accepted on desktop computers or laptops, but somehow it's acceptable on pocket computers.
It's not a desktop or laptop computer. Your right. Do you think it would make sense to claim a smart watch is a desktop computer or a laptop equivalent? I don't expect it to be, nor did I when smart phones came out. As you can do somethings, but not all things a desktop or laptop can do. Everything is and was more limited on said device. They are different categories of products. They all compute. But, they are not all the same.
Apple is just trying to rake in for as long as they can. The ride will end at some point. EU started it, its still has ways to go, but it will eventually get here as well.
More doom and gloom coming soon.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: freedomlinux
In all seriousness: if you say that these people rely on this money, it’s not really a tip, is it?

I know tipping is broken in the US but still. Otherwise, everything is a tip from now on: ordered something from Amazon and tipped the driver for it but the article was free. No need to pay taxes.. etc.
Yoga and meditation classes are often donation/tip-based to allow anyone to join even if they’re poor
 
I fear we're well beyond the point where that it a reasonable option. Apple and Google as a duopoly in the smartphone market have essentially removed people's ability to effectively vote for change with their wallet.

To be clear, Apple's never needed 30% of every transaction. They took it because they could. And they offer just enough convenience that most normal people (i.e. the people who actually need to voice displeasure with this stuff) won't sacrifice any of it to improve things, because they don't really care about tech as long as it isn't too painful to use.
Regarding your "duopoly", I guess you've never heard of Samsung, a small company from Korea that sells personal electronic devices all over the world.

Apple's share is for the opportunity to reach a desired market and the commercial services they provide for the sellers, and it is not simply 30%, which you well know. People vote with their wallets on whether any price that any company charges for anything is worth their money. Happens all day, every day.
 
Yoga and meditation classes are often donation/tip-based to allow anyone to join even if they’re poor
I think that would be fine but that’s not their argument. They say that these people rely on tips.

If developers put a tip jar in their app that also falls under the 15/30% rule. How is that different?
 
Enough with Tipping!!!
Put up a venmo tag during a live video.
Tipping has gone way too far, if you don’t like the job, don’t take it.
With that said, Apple is correct, nobody should expect a free ride. Apple is a service and many companies would abuse the free tip ride if apple allowed it. If apple accepted payment, then they would need to send out a special 1099 to every person receiving a tip. it’s that simple. At that time, apple would face one audit after another and maybe some people didn’t receive a tip or have no way to track, then apple would be sued again.
 
Regarding your "duopoly", I guess you've never heard of Samsung, a small company from Korea that sells personal electronic devices all over the world.

The "duopoly" in question is really regarding the mobile OS market where iOS and Android are the only two major players. Apple's restrictions on sideloading and alternative app stores stifles app access competition in a major segment of the mobile OS market. Same is true in the tablet OS market.
 
  • Like
Reactions: boss.king
Regarding your "duopoly", I guess you've never heard of Samsung, a small company from Korea that sells personal electronic devices all over the world.

Apple's share is for the opportunity to reach a desired market and the commercial services they provide for the sellers, and it is not simply 30%, which you well know. People vote with their wallets on whether any price that any company charges for anything is worth their money. Happens all day, every day.
Correct, I haven't heard of any widely popular Samsung operating system and integrated app marketplace. There's iOS and the App Store, Android and the Google Play Store... nope, not seeing any big Samsung effort since they discontinued Tizen back in 2021.

As should be obvious, we're not talking about hardware here since the article is entirely about software and app store fees.
 
“Apple's reasoning is that a one-to-one donation is a monetary gift, but a workshop or class with at least two people is digital content that's subject to a commission.”

I don’t see anything unreasonable about this argument, and it’s the crux of the matter at hand here.

It also sounds like Apple had reps working directly with this company to consult on how to get into compliance.

Not really sure if this is one of those “how dare they” stories 🤷‍♂️
 
I think that would be fine but that’s not their argument. They say that these people rely on tips.

If developers put a tip jar in their app that also falls under the 15/30% rule. How is that different?
Why would it matter? Apple shouldn’t be taking a cut of anyone’s tips. It’s illegal in the United States for an employer to take a cut of their employee’s tips and this should be the case over the Internet too

The Internet was supposed to *free* us, not give us more rent-seeking middlemen
Digital goods are not physical goods.
And? Why would that make a difference
 
  • Like
Reactions: AppliedMicro
It's not a desktop or laptop computer. Your right. Do you think it would make sense to claim a smart watch is a desktop computer or a laptop equivalent? I don't expect it to be, nor did I when smart phones came out. As you can do somethings, but not all things a desktop or laptop can do. Everything is and was more limited on said device. They are different categories of products. They all compute. But, they are not all the same.
Some people don't even use traditional computers and laptops anymore. they live their lives on their phones and tablets. A lot of people don't even TALK on their smart"phones". Its just a pocket computer with anywhere internet connection.

Why should they be so restricted?

And I'm sure you've heard it a million times, the people who worry about security, can just continue to use Apple App store.
 
Isn't it bad enough that instructors of studio classes have and are selling merchandise before classes? Now soon we might see touch pads of (PLEASE TIP YOUR INSTRUCTOR) when you leave the studio class.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wbeasley
Of the $60 subscription fee that customers pay, Apple collects 15 to 30 percent. The remainder is split between Insight Timer and the teachers that participate on the platform, with each getting a 50 percent cut. Insight Timer earned $20 million in subscription revenue in 2023.

So the Insight Timer developer is collecting 35-42.5%, and the teachers are getting the same? Why doesn’t the developer give more to the teachers? No wonder these pinheads are pushing users to tip/donate to the teachers. Cheap bastages. But they’ll just whine about Apple to a tech blog, and enough mindless sheep will blindly go along with the false narrative.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wbeasley
Correct, I haven't heard of any widely popular Samsung operating system and integrated app marketplace. There's iOS and the App Store, Android and the Google Play Store... nope, not seeing any big Samsung effort since they discontinued Tizen back in 2021.

As should be obvious, we're not talking about hardware here since the article is entirely about software and app store fees.
Samsung doesn’t quite have an OS outside of Tizen, which has been discontinued on most of their devices except their TV’s. On mobile devices, they’ve basically gone Android (Wear OS on watches), but they put their own skin on it called One UI, soon to be up to Version 6. They do have an ecosystem with watches, phones, tablet, and PC’s running Windows. They also have a Samsung Store that is installed along side of the Google Play Store that often hosts duplicates of apps already in the Play Store but also contains Samsung apps and some exclusives that do not appear in the Play Store. The ecosystem emulates Apple’s in many ways, trying to share information between their systems, such as passwords and health data, along with features similar to Continuity and Universal Control that works with Windows. Samsung is trying to be Apple by duplicating many of the features Apple releases in their OS’es.
 
Samsung doesn’t quite have an OS outside of Tizen, which has been discontinued on most of their devices except their TV’s. On mobile devices, they’ve basically gone Android (Wear OS on watches), but they put their own skin on it called One UI, soon to be up to Version 6. They do have an ecosystem with watches, phones, tablet, and PC’s running Windows. They also have a Samsung Store that is installed along side of the Google Play Store that often hosts duplicates of apps already in the Play Store but also contains Samsung apps and some exclusives that do not appear in the Play Store. The ecosystem emulates Apple’s in many ways, trying to share information between their systems, such as passwords and health data, along with features similar to Continuity and Universal Control that works with Windows. Samsung is trying to be Apple by duplicating many of the features Apple releases in their OS’es.
And yet it still relies on Android, and in turn Google, and therefore it's a duopoly. It's Android (regardless of the fork or the skin) or iOS, and there are no other reasonable options.
 
And yet it still relies on Android, and in turn Google, and therefore it's a duopoly. It's Android (regardless of the fork or the skin) or iOS, and there are no other reasonable options.
Correct, I agree that it is a duopoly. I’ve argued that myself in other threads. Underlying it all is Android or Wear OS. I was just answering a post where it seemed you were unaware that Samsung hosts its own App Store and duplicates all of Google’s apps, along with its efforts into creating a Samsung ecosystem centered on Bixby and a very Apple-like ecosystem, which in my opinion outclasses anything Google is doing on its own lines of hardware. Also note the Samsung ecosystem does not work with any non-Samsung Android device, so to the outside user, they may not be aware Android is the underlying OS though all the Google apps are still present. Two years ago, Samsung was using Tizen on their watches, the last Tizen holdout when it comes to computers or computer-related products. They’ve basically abandoned it except on televisions, which still run Tizen. I apologize if I’m telling you stuff you already knew. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: boss.king
I wonder if it’s even legal. I know employers aren’t allowed to take a cut of their employees tips because it’s considered the employee property
Apple isnt the employer. They are the provider of the tip jar and now they arent providing it for free (as their rules already stated but they are enforcing it). The app dev team knew it was a rule. It just wasnt enforced.

For those saying tipping is optional, years ago a group of us visited the US.
Staff wrote on bills messages (since we obviously come from a country where staff are paid and tipping isnt essential).
A cab driver not only wanted his fare but had his hand out for a tip and when we explained we had just landed and had no cash, huffed and puffed and grumbled loudly as he threw our bags out on the footpath.

We know tipping is portrayed as making staff engage better for tips.
But in reality, the bosses just pay wages so low the staff rely on tips to make ends meet. It's exploitive on those who can least afford to say no to it.

Wasnt there some US business that had a sign saying tips were optional as they pay their staff livable wages?
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: maxoakland
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.