Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Strongly disagree. There’s a reason no one is begging for Qualcomm chips in iPhones. Apple does an amazing job with custom silicon.
Ahh but they actually ARE begging for Qualcomm chips in iPhones (their modems). I agree with the sentiment of your post however, since we are talking CPU not modems here.
 
As a native English speaker, there’s no particular implication of cause and effect in the sentence. You could substitute “while“ for “as”.

True. No particular implication and using while might have been clearer. I fully realise how inferences of meaning change in different societies. A native speaker would rarely ever think of that title as amusing since he does not usually relate the use of as in that way as other parts of the world do. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: PickUrPoison
Back to my original actual point
Apple needs to let NVidia back into the game and continue working with AMD. Without discrete graphics as an option on the new Apple silicon macs, they are going to be unappealing to many. Even worse if they get rid of 3rd party graphics drivers on Apple Silicon for eGPUs and expansion cards on Mac Pro.

"Go buy a PC to game" shouldn't be the refrain. Apple isn't even used that much in business, its become for of a luxury consumer brand. We need more options to make the graphics appealing, not less.

i was seeing iPad Pros with executives everywhere pre-covid. And last month, the 2018 iPad pro with an xbox controller was the BEST Fortnite experience I had across multiple platforms. 120FPS and didnt get hot.

Apple has already arrived. I think the paradigm has really changed. Chromebooks and Apple are splitting the market, just like Android and iOS did in 2015. 80:20. Everything other consumer market will be a niche market and collapse because it will lack scale economy. Business will follow consumer, just like with Blackberry/RIM.

On hardware, Intel will become an enterprise player and, as much as I was looking forward to Tiger Lake, what, a year and a half ago (?), AMD will be at 5nm before Intel is at 7nm
 
  • Like
Reactions: matrix07
I… don't think there's any risk Adobe CC and MS Office don't get ported.

Less popular apps that haven't been updated in a while anyway, that's another question.
I guarantee that it will be at least a couple of years before the big engineering packages get ported, if at all. MATLAB, COMSOL, AUTOCAD, etc... As for HPC developers, out of the box INTEL FORTRAN is not going to happen, so that will leave jumping through hoops to install gfortran, but knowing Apple, once they have their own silicon, they will lock this platform down. Before you know it, you will be jailbreaking your MacBook Pro so that you could install third-party code.
 
It’s still very possible these chips make it into a future MacBook Pro. If Apple is planning on a two year transition, they won’t let the machines not ready for a Apple Silicon chip go stagnant.
You apparently completely missed the part where the article said "Since the Tiger Lake chips are for lower power laptops and max out at 28W, it is unlikely Apple will ever use them."
 
  • Disagree
  • Like
Reactions: Spock and CarlJ
Will common analysis tools like R and Stata need to be ported over to the ARM Macs? If so, will that take a while? Apple says MS Office will be immediately available on the ARM Macs, but will that be the full version currently running on Intel Macs?
 
Will common analysis tools like R and Stata need to be ported over to the ARM Macs? If so, will that take a while? Apple says MS Office will be immediately available on the ARM Macs, but will that be the full version currently running on Intel Macs?

The full version of office should be ported. It’s really not a lot of work to port those sorts of apps.
 
"Rise above imitators"
"beats the competition"
its just AMD and no one else on planet earth. Apple Silicon is Mac specific and not released yet.

Tiger Lake, Lion Lake, x Lake...even I who has been following tech for a couple of decades can't tell which is which and why one is better than the other.
 
Consoles are subsidized, so they cost more than the sale price.... and they are designed to last 6-7 years without upgrades.
That's not entirely true. The PS4 and XB1 were sold below cost and MS/Sony use subscriptinos and software sales to make up the difference. The Nintendo Switch is not sold below cost. Sure it's very close to break even though. Nintendo had said they would not sell the Switch below cost ever ans till this day they have not. That's based no the parts price. If you added in Swtch R&D though it would be even closer to break even.
 
Please give me a 16" MBP with this.

I think it is possible they'll ship an updated 16" this fall with an Intel CPU for the last time before moving the entire MacbookPro line to ARM. I don't know if it will have this CPU or the 10th gen, but I'd expect a CPU update before they ditch Intel completely.
 
The bigger question is why did Apple release that iMac shortly before this 11th gen intel CPU?
It's the Apple/Intel contract over? Or did Apple juat want a bigger ASi Mac vs intel Mac push?
 
People keep telling me that an Apple SOC is already so powerful that it will be more powerful than RTX 3090... How is it going to be possible for a SOC that draws 15w to be equalling a GPU that draws 350w of power.

Who is saying that? Of course Apple SoC’s won’t be able to compete with behemoths like that any time soon, if ever. But a 10-15W Apple SoC (estimated 512 shader cores) is about 50% slower than a 50+W 1650 (1024 shader cores) -According to GFXbench

What this means is that a laptop part with 16 GPU cores (1024 shader cores) should have little difficulty matching mid-range desktop performance at around 30W
 
The bigger question is why did Apple release that iMac shortly before this 11th gen intel CPU?
It's the Apple/Intel contract over? Or did Apple juat want a bigger ASi Mac vs intel Mac push?

That’s an easy one. Tiger Lake is an ultrabook laptop CPU. It is max 4 cores and 15/28W - no desktop versions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: the8thark
The bigger question is why did Apple release that iMac shortly before this 11th gen intel CPU?
It's the Apple/Intel contract over? Or did Apple juat want a bigger ASi Mac vs intel Mac push?
Intel says that the new Tiger Lake CPUs will be in more than 50 laptops coming this fall and named a number of partners such as Acer, Dell, HP, Lenovo, and Samsung, but Apple was not among them. Since the Tiger Lake chips are for lower power laptops and max out at 28W, it is unlikely Apple will ever use them.

Maybe because of this. 🤪
 
You apparently completely missed the part where the article said "Since the Tiger Lake chips are for lower power laptops and max out at 28W, it is unlikely Apple will ever use them."

Which is a weird thing, since 13” MBP uses 28W parts. Tiger Lake is a perfect upgrade for that laptop.
 
  • Like
Reactions: smulji
Which is a weird thing, since 13” MBP uses 28W parts. Tiger Lake is a perfect upgrade for that laptop.
It might be, if the 13” MBP doesn’t go Apple Silicon first.

Some rumors suggest the 13” MBP and the MBA will be among the first machines to convert over.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.