The Intel 7 Series appears to be a much more significant change comparatively.Is it better to just wait for Ivy Bridge?![]()
So all the PC already out there will have this problem, ouch.
What would have been tweaked then? The PCH is the same as in HM55 like noted by iFixit (step 16). I haven't seen anything that points it to be different from the standard HM55
The Intel 7 Series appears to be a much more significant change comparatively.
The P67 can be used on LGA1156 given the identical DMI signaling. You do not gain the doubled speed though and are still limited to 2.5 GT/s.
Although the 6-series chipset finally brought native 6Gbps SATA to Intel platforms it failed to fix issues with 23.976 fps video playback. Intel also failed to deliver a chipset that can support SNB's processor graphics as well as overclocking
I know that Intel doesn't allow 3rd party manufacturers but doesn't Apple use a custom Intel chipset for their hardware?
There was the Uprated Santa Rosa platform but that can solely be accomplished via overclocking on almost any platform.It was something about the graphics support. Maybe it was the previous generation.
The 6 Series isn't that much different from the 5 Series.It just seems like there have been several issues with the new platform in general
There was the Uprated Santa Rosa platform but that can solely be accomplished via overclocking on almost any platform.
You are much more dependent on multiplier control post-Sandy Bridge.
Something much more custom would have to be between Intel and Apple but I find it highly unlikely.My point was that one cannot assert Apple won't use some non-standard Intel chipset, not that it would be so different as to not have the SATA problem.
Sounds more like someone/some people are getting fired soon...![]()
Why does anybody have to get fired? Intel has been leading the industry in chip development for years without skipping a beat. Nobody deserves to lose their job after one mistake in years.
not the MBP news I was looking for when initially pulling up MR...
I agree with you.
But there are mistakes and mistakes and this one is a very public very expensive mistake =X
If you were running Intel wouldn't you like to find a guilty part?![]()
I agree with you.
But there are mistakes and mistakes and this one is a very public very expensive mistake =X
If you were running Intel wouldn't you like to find a guilty part?![]()