Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I am disappointed to say that whatever lead Apple had over Intel with M1 seems completely lost now. Intel has sprung back and how. Hope it forces Apple to push harder with M2 Pro chips.
Nah, Apple knows that whatever they release will be the fastest Mac in that form factor and there’s zero competition in the macOS compatibility market. If anyone wants a computer built with Intel type performance, there’s several companies out there ready to sell Intel systems to those folks.
 
Of course it’ll be a monster of a powerhouse but it’ll consume 200W and melt your legs into a pile of goo. Not to mention, why only 8 performance cores and 16 efficient ones? Shouldn’t it be the other way around?

You just talked about "melting your legs" yet you wonder why there are only 8 performance cores?

Performance cores melt your legs. They're the cores that get very hot. Therefore there are fewer of them and more of the efficient cores.

I would still suggest wearing heat-retardant pants, though.

🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: compwiz1202
So by mobile they mean laptop. That’s a bit disingenuous. I don’t think that counts as mobile. Certainly not the first thing people think of these days.
This one is also mobile…

1672784201828.png
 
  • Love
Reactions: CarAnalogy
So by mobile they mean laptop. That’s a bit disingenuous. I don’t think that counts as mobile. Certainly not the first thing people think of these days.
Well iMacs used ‘mobile’ processors for ages so I would wait and see what companies make of these new products. My MacBook Pro (work) spends 95% of its life plugged in with 2 screens. Such a processor would be great for me.

I’m more interested in the lower parts though - those with 12/14 cores instead. Hopefully these will be on par with the M1 Pro/M2 and give Apple a kick to carry on pushing the envelope with their own silicon (which is very good but does have limitations)
 
For what I do on a Mac these days, I just don’t want really care anymore. Web browsing, watching YouTube, managing my photos, listening to Spotify. Do I need a 24 core processor for that? The M1 in my 2020 MBP is just as super fast as the day I bought it. I am still shocked by how quick and easy it was to edit 4K footage of my friends wedding and shared it privately over you YouTube.

I still use Windows, but even in the environment where I work, everything is being loaded over a network with exception of Office.
 
This will be great for keeping my coffee hot.

Or making it hot when it’s cold…
 


Intel today announced the launch of its 13th-generation processor lineup, which is headlined by the flagship Intel Core i9-13980HX, a 24-core 5.6GHz laptop chip that Intel says is the "world's fastest mobile processor" in terms of clock speed.

intel-13th-generation-processors.jpg

Apple no longer uses Intel chips in its Macs, with the exception of the Mac mini and the yet-to-be-updated Mac Pro with Intel Xeon chips, but Intel is now a direct competitor, supplying processors that compete with Apple's own M-series Apple silicon chips.

Intel claims that the 5.6GHz turbo boost clock speed of the new Core i9 chip is the fastest mobile processor as of December 2022, with 11 percent faster single-thread performance and 49 percent faster multitask performance over the prior-generation Intel Core i9-12900HK chip. The Intel Core i9-13980HX features eight performance cores, 16 efficient cores, and 32 threads, along with support for up to 128GB RAM.

The prior-generation chip outperforms the everything but the M1 Ultra on multi-core Geekbench benchmarking tests (barely beating out the M1 Max), but it cannot compare when it comes to power efficiency as Apple silicon chips consume much less energy. The new Intel Core i9-13980HX from Intel will likely be faster than current Apple silicon chips, but designed for performance-focused power-hungry laptops that do not directly compete with Apple's Mac lineup.

It is worth noting that Intel has long offered faster turbo boost clock speeds than Apple silicon chips, as the M2 reaches just 3.5GHz. Intel last year made the same "fastest mobile processor" claims for the Intel Core i9-12900HK, comparing it to the M1 Max, but it did get beat by the M1 Ultra that Apple debuted later in the year. Apple is working on M2 Pro, Max, and Ultra chips that could better compete with the 2022 Intel Core i9-13980HX.

Intel today also announced the launch of a suite of more efficient 13th-generation P-series and U-series chips with up to 14 cores that will be available for thinner, lighter laptops.

Article Link: Intel Launches 'World's Fastest Mobile Processor' With 24 Cores
This is it! Scientists just announced that they have harnessed nuclear fusion as an energy source. This new i9 processor will probably reach Sun-like temperatures that will allow it to achieve nuclear fusion, lol. You will not want to have one of these laptops on your lap!!
 
  • Love
Reactions: compwiz1202
We're back to measuring how fast a processor is by its GHz? What is this, 2002?
 
Geeze, kids. Who cares how much power it uses? It's not like there are going to be rolling blackouts in the USA or anything like that.
For a laptop I care. I need to get a full 8 hours of usage without power some times in the field. So yes, I care. I am not a kid thanks.
 
A serious alternative to TSMC - and technology originated and owned by a company in the USA - is going to be very important to have as the Cold War with China increase.

Intel just seems to be doubling down with x86 - and a technology intended for PCs just doesn't feel like it can seriously go forward too far as the 21st century progresses and we get smaller and smaller devices.

Maybe they are working on a new more power efficient architecture and more x86 is tiding them over until that day. Let's hope.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.