"Again"? When was the last time that Apple called a product "revolutionary" based on the processor?
Somewhere between spring and summer of 2003.
"Again"? When was the last time that Apple called a product "revolutionary" based on the processor?
the graphics of the 4000 have improved 40% over the 3000.
what I found most interesting is the claim made by Anandtech that haswell graphics will be really big improvement over the 4000 graphics.
It seems to me that if you have a 2011 mac with sandy bridge you need to wait until haswell. If you have an older mac go out and buy the 2012 with ivy bridge.
A SSD as a boot drive is perfect
The average person does not know that Samsung makes the retina display or that Microsoft powers iCloud. Surely you're not going to argue that nonsense too.
What does that have anything to do with Apple and their advertising of processor specs?
That's what you do. For example if you were ordering the current 2011 iMac, you would use a 256GB SSD as your OS drive and working drive, and add in a 2TB HDD for all your media. (Internal. The 27" iMacs can fit both.) The new iMac config-to-order options we can only speculate about right now, but it stands to reason that you'd use a smaller SSD as the boot drive same as before and add, what? 2TB, 3TB, 4TB? as a secondary HDD for media.
And not to worry: Lion is a lot smaller than Windows 7 as far as footprint.
Everything. Apple hides the guts, or its "magic," as you called it. The average person on the street is provided with the brand but is not actually provided with the processor model. Given there is huge variation within brands like i3 or i5, the average guy on the street does not know what is in his mac.
could we see mac updates tomorrow?
i7-3820QM in a Mac Mini with a discrete GPU would be ace. Shame I dont see it happening until Q4.
could we see mac updates tomorrow?
I would have thought that unlikely. The online store should be down in the UK by now but isn't.
In the past Apple would release updated Macbook Pros around 1.5-2 months after Intel's initial announcement. Sandy Bridge chips were 'available' early Jan 2011 and new MBPs were announced late Feb.
I do hope they show up sooner rather than later though![]()
From Ivy Bridge vs Sandy Bridge @ 4.8GHz Quad-Core CPU Showdown:
That's good.
Enjoy your new HotBooks
Corrected.
I guess Apple could be a jackass, pull FW and say "Buy one of our $69 adaptors if you want FW!" Looks like Sonnet might have an adaptor:
http://www.thunderbolt-peripherals.com/thunderbolt-adapter
A huge increase in speed for apps that can take advantage of it like the Creative Suite.
Anywhere from 8x -27x faster.
http://www.nvidia.com/object/adobe-cs6.html?cid=cs6
What?
The store usually goes down really late/early morning pacific time for Mac refreshes. If it happens tomorrow, expect the store to be down around 1 am pacific time.
I think it's going to happen tomorrow or Thursday.
They give you enough info for you to figure it out if it matters. They tell you i7, i5 etc.. How many cores and the speed.There are potentially nineteen models of i3 that could be in your Macbook or Air. Apple does not list these.
http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/All-Core-i3-Models/951/3
http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/All-Core-i3-Models/951/5
There are nearly as many i5s and i7s. Some i3s perform better than i5s. For example an i3-2350M is 20% faster than an i5-520M.
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/
If you're buying a dell or an acer or a sumsung etc... they will always give you the chip model (i.e. i3-2350M) on the specs of your machine.
Apple doesn't.
Instead Apple gives you techie sounding brands. And then you give me links to those brands to argue that the consumer is well informed by Apple.
They give you enough info for you to figure it out if it matters. They tell you i7, i5 etc.. How many cores and the speed.
The actual model number is irrelevant to most consumers.
The extra details only matter if you are building a system from scratch. Where socket type, and unlocked multipliers matter..