well only if you well.....you know.katie ta achoo said:All the cool kids have carpal tunnel, didn't ya know?
well only if you well.....you know.katie ta achoo said:All the cool kids have carpal tunnel, didn't ya know?
MacNut said:well only if you well.....you know.![]()
mad jew said:I never use white text. It's fun and keeps things interesting.
But only used with discretion. I use white text sometimes to hide search keywords so it's easier to search for when the subject itself may be too general in topic.mad jew said:I see it as a way of having off-topic conversations without annoying other members.
sushi said:Sorry guys, but IMHO posting ghost letters is a waste of everyone's time unless you are hiding spoilers and the like.
But that's just me.
Sushi
Would newer members be missing out on anything if they weren't expecting to read anything in the first place?thequicksilver said:...to make sure I'm not "missing out" on anything. It also does make the place seem very cliquey, with only regular members knowing of this trend, and newer members missing out on the banter.
Lacero said:Philosophical questions like these have dumbfounded men for ages and will continue to do so for eternity.
Lacero said:Would newer members be missing out on anything if they weren't expecting to read anything in the first place?
Lacero said:This reminds me of the phrase, and I'm sure you've heard of it before: "If a tree falls in the forest and there is nobody around does it make a sound?".
Lacero said:Likewise, if text was written in a post and nobody could read it, was it actually written? Philosophical questions like these have dumbfounded men for ages and will continue to do so for eternity.
I <3 you.Blue Velvet said:Good thing there's some women around here then...
Maybe not. But then again, this is like wispering at the dinner table or at a meeting. Some are going to feel left out. IMHO, this does not bode well for a community but rather strikes me as being rather clickish if you will.Lacero said:Would newer members be missing out on anything if they weren't expecting to read anything in the first place?
~Shard~ said:I agree.
How is it that this thread hasn't been shut down yet, anyway?
sushi said:Makes one wonder doesn't it? eek! <-- can't use icons it seems.
Lacero said:Would newer members be missing out on anything if they weren't expecting to read anything in the first place?
This reminds me of the phrase, and I'm sure you've heard of it before: "If a tree falls in the forest and there is nobody around does it make a sound?".
Likewise, if text was written in a post and nobody could read it, was it actually written? Philosophical questions like these have dumbfounded men for ages and will continue to do so for eternity.
you did not see anything here. see i told you so.
thequicksilver said:Puis, enfaite, j'écrirai en français. Tu ne comprends rien (probablement) puis ça ne te donne aucune problème. Ultimément, ne comprendre pas = ne vois pas, n'est-ce-pas?
thequicksilver said:After all, to not understand is the same as to not see, no?
thequicksilver said:Cos that's what you're saying. And it's not true.
thequicksilver said:The whispering at the dinner table is the best metaphor there is for it. It's rude.
~Shard~ said:Yes, I noticed that as well. Well, you can use icons like thishowever they are not "invisible" like the text and probably look somewhat out of place - or if nothing else, a dead giveaway that you are using white text, which really defeats the purpose...