Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I wish I could customize the email address like I can do with current mail aliases. I currently use Abine's Blur for masked emails which let's you do this. You can reply to can email from the alias but not initiate one from it. So Apple has an advantage with that feature.
 
I admit that I did not dig further into this feature, but if this "relay" means my mails are relayed through Apple's services (what I expect), I would not use it.
After the whole CSAM thing I would not give any data to Apple...
It’s setup so that neither Apple, Nor the third party know what you’re requesting.
CSAM is done client-side so no data leaves your device or decrypts your photos in the cloud making them accessible and vulnerable. It’s safer than what the competition does.
 
Last edited:
I own a domain and then use a bespoke address for each and all sites which get piped to a single master (catch-all) account. e.g. macrumors@mydomainnamehere.com. That way I can:
1) See who sold my email / has slack security, allowing my address out into the wild (Yes I mean you, ProtectYourBubble, GolfOnline, LinkedIn, Tumblr etc..)
2) Blackhole that address.

Alternatively, with Gmail, you can add an underscore and then anything you like, and you will still get it.
E.g. mygmailaccountname_macrumors@gmail.com

Having a bespoke email address is good as well as if bad people get a hold of it, they can't automatically be sure they can login to your account elsewhere, should you make the mistake of reusing a password which lets face, we all have done at some point.
hmmmm the gmail thingie didn't work for me.
 
I admit that I did not dig further into this feature, but if this "relay" means my mails are relayed through Apple's services (what I expect), I would not use it.
After the whole CSAM thing I would not give any data to Apple...
Why apple would check all photos/ messages but give the option to have 100 aliases to a hypothetical child molester ?!
I don’t get it even if the aliases is a great idea for normal users.
 
Why apple would check all photos/ messages but give the option to have 100 aliases?!
I don’t get it
The 100 aliases feature seems to require you to relay all emails through Apple's services – so that's the way Apple could look into your mails...
I would never do enable this, I would also recommend to never use iCloud Keychain, so that all you passwords are stored in iCloud !
 
Or you can simply have a secondary email address for all the spam and registrations on websites.
preferably a google or especially a Yahoo email. Does anyone on earth actually use yahoo for personal email? I gave up on google when a hacker emailed me my own gmail password asking for bitcoin in return for not sending pics of myself playing around to my contacts.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: amartinez1660
The 100 aliases feature seems to require you to relay all emails through Apple's services – so that's the way Apple could look into your mails...
I would never do enable this, I would also recommend to never use iCloud Keychain, so that all you passwords are stored in iCloud !
The relay feature isn’t more or less safe than your iCloud mail account.
They don’t look into your mails, they don’t look into your photos or messages. And they can’t access your passwords.

they do CLIENT-SIDE checks of your iCloud photos, they don’t analyse or view their content.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KeithBN
The 100 aliases feature seems to require you to relay all emails through Apple's services – so that's the way Apple could look into your mails...
I would never do enable this, I would also recommend to never use iCloud Keychain, so that all you passwords are stored in iCloud !
I never used it , like I never used any password app, I created my own
In regard to reading my emails..well the ones I would use it it wouldn't matter, it's just to avoid spam and unsolicited email from big and small companies, same method for my iCloud email and the 3 aliases allowed right now.
 
100 aliases is limited for you, and because of that not useful? C’mon! What about the 100 times and instances you use it? No utility there?
I love the concept but having to pick n' chose which sites I actually use this feature or not, is a weird compromise considering the quite limited implications this has on Apple's end. I am using it now, for 100 accounts. So it's useful there, but not for the majority of my account and thus not that useful in the long run.
 
This should be built-in to the login / create login, etc., feature so it could be done ON THE FLY (i.e., at the entry point) rather than having to dive into the Settings applet. Hopefully, in a later version ...
 
Why is 100 not enough? I don’t see the need to use a different one for every single website I subscribe too.

I would use them mainly for websites I don’t really trust. And I’m even then I could still cluster.
Different one for each address can help spot a breach. This will allow you to get a jump in changing email and password. Other benefit is it’s harder to track you because no two sites have the same password (obvs it’s also good to minimize as much static PII as possible like phone number for 2FA, using ios15 authenticator where you can.)
 
I like the private relay feature. However, I'm also curious to know how this would impact bandwidth usage. I have a very limited data plan so I'm worried this will negatively impact available usage.
Absolutely no effect.
 
I admit that I did not dig further into this feature, but if this "relay" means my mails are relayed through Apple's services (what I expect), I would not use it.
After the whole CSAM thing I would not give any data to Apple...
Agree on the concern.

Apple claims to do a pure relay, only scanning for spam as required to keep a trusted provider certification. They delete immediately after relay. And Note both GMAIL and Yahoo and others Scan users mails.

I don’t see Apple as worse than their email provider competition here.
 
I own a domain and then use a bespoke address for each and all sites which get piped to a single master (catch-all) account. e.g. macrumors@mydomainnamehere.com. That way I can:
1) See who sold my email / has slack security, allowing my address out into the wild (Yes I mean you, ProtectYourBubble, GolfOnline, LinkedIn, Tumblr etc..)
2) Blackhole that address.

Alternatively, with Gmail, you can add an underscore and then anything you like, and you will still get it.
E.g. mygmailaccountname_macrumors@gmail.com

Having a bespoke email address is good as well as if bad people get a hold of it, they can't automatically be sure they can login to your account elsewhere, should you make the mistake of reusing a password which lets face, we all have done at some point.
Lol. I haven’t reused a password since iOS added iCloud Keychain around 2014 and before that between 2007 and 2014 my passwords were uniquely modular, eg lowsec88mr or highsec99usb or highsec99am for Mac rumors, US Bank and AMEX respectively (obviously anyone who saw the pattern could have cracked it); key chain came along in the nick of time as the modular approach was also long in the tooth.
 
Thanks for sharing, while I don't want my own domain, my primary email is with gmail so thanks for sharing that tidbit!
About 3 years ago I partially implemented unique addresses using gmail, eg rob+001@gmail .com and kept incrementing the numeric part.

Downside was many sites wouldn’t accept a + in the email address. It was also a lot of work to change over so I suspended the exercise. Didn’t know about gmail’s _ option only knew of the +.

I am converting to the HME set up tho. Hit the 100 hard limit a couple weeks ago. Am glad the limit was lifted today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jz0309
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.