It remains an interesting observation that the companies being targeted by the DMA are US tech giants. It does make you wonder just what is up with the EU. Many people here love to tout that the EU comprises of a larger market than the US, and what is there to show for it, exactly? The bulk of consumer tech we use today continue to hail from the US, such as windows, macOS, iOS, android, google services, Facebook, twitter, tik-tok, Instagram, WhatsApp, amazon and chatGPT. Even "alternatives" like Threads and Bluesky are also US-based.
There's Mastodon, and it's still a very niche platform which is not utilised by the bulk of creators.
Perhaps instead of trying to legislate these companies (which I view as a bandaid over the greater overarching issue that excessive legislation in the EU has effectively strangled any desire to innovate amongst their businesses), perhaps the EU should do what China did and work towards propping up their own homegrown alternatives. Fund the development of a EU-branded smartphone, mobile App Store and supporting ecosystem. Have their own local alternatives to services such as YouTube. Otherwise, you run into the same problem all over again - that any such legislation serves only to entrench the status quo.
Heck, I can argue that Apple could just remove all these features from their devices come iOS 19 and probably not see a hit to their sales in the region.
Finally, I won't be weighing in as much because I continue to have faith in Apple's ability to navigate the DMA with minimal hit to their bottom line. That was never in doubt. How Apple will eventually respond to it, well, we will know in time, and in the meanwhile, life goes on.
Now, back to contemplating whether to upgrade from my M1 MBA to the 15" M4 MBA or not... 🤔