It’s funny that parents believe they can stop adolescence boys from accessing porn.
Reducing this issue to porn is an overly simplistic take. This is about
informed consent, which children are functionally and legally
incapable of providing. One of the defining traits of children is that they lack the cognitive development to provide informed consent.
And as a father of two young daughters, I can assure you that there's so much more to consider than porn. Chatrooms are used for grooming. Recommendation engines serve up radicalized content. Photo and social media feeds create unrealistic body image and lifestyle expectations. Just a few months ago, graphic footage of Charlie Kirk being murdered was autoplayed to millions of people who didn't want to see it. Peer reviewed study after study demonstrates that content like the above is a cause for increased rates of issues like depression, eating disorders, suicide, and more. The list goes on.
Mind you, I'm not sitting here clutching my pearls. I'm doing my job by preparing them to be functioning, healthy adults, which means exposing them to
age appropriate content and conversations. So, no "bubble boys" here, but I'm also not needlessly putting them at risk by
prematurely exposing them to potentially harmful content that could desensitize them to risks like predatory behavior, misinformation, or other dangers.
Those sorts of dangers are also why society has a role to play in this. All functioning, healthy societies must protect and invest in the next generation: society's survival literally depends on it! Because of the "Wild West" mentality of the early internet, we threw an entire generation of kids to the wolves before they were ready. That's not the model for how things should work, and society is slowly realizing the disservice we did to that generation. As a result, kids of this next generation may actually have the safeguards in place to ensure that—while "kids will be kids"—they can also enjoy the innocence of
being a kid while it is still right for them to do so, thanks to the fact that parents have more of the tools they need to parent effectively.
To be fair, I admittedly don't like that this information is being shared—even as a range—with Facebook et al., and I wish the law did more to protect the use of this information (e.g. requiring that it be discarded after validation, with teeth to back that up), but the hand-wringing seems out of proportion for what's actually happening.