Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
For a few years, all jailbreaks required that you connect your iDevice to a computer, convince it that the computer can be trusted, and then running software on the computer which does exploit things. So yes, security exploits, but none that a hacker can do from a distance, and if you have a passcode, none that a hacker can do without your passcode. So basically, Apple should protect you from taking a gun and shooting yourself in the foot, but they don't.

In the past, there had been one jailbreak that worked by visiting a website, and that is obviously a very dangerous security hole and was fixed very quickly. So figuratively, that would be a stranger shooting you in the foot because you asked them, but that stranger could obviously shoot you if you don't ask to be shot as well.


Good point about the physical access.

But just because all that have been done require you to ask permissions, doesn't mean that a method without asking couldn't be found (though history would imply this isn't possible, because we haven't seen it in the wild yet).
 
I love it how Apple keeps "trying" to protect iOS from jail-breaks via constant patching.

Reminds me of piracy.... Sites gets taken down, but 20 more pop up in its place within an hour.

Makes me tingling all over.

Has been working quite well. There was nothing from I think 6.1.3 to 7.0.2. That was quite a long time.

And jailbreaks are not actually much of a problem for Apple. The reason why Apple has to fix these things is because ever jailbreak uses some vulnerability that _might_ be usable in a remote exploit. So to avoid the possibility of a remote exploit, you remove all known vulnerabilities.

Good point about the physical access.

But just because all that have been done require you to ask permissions, doesn't mean that a method without asking couldn't be found (though history would imply this isn't possible, because we haven't seen it in the wild yet).

That's why Apple _must_ fix the vulnerabilities used for a jailbreak. And there was actually one remote jailbreak in the past, but that hasn't happened for a while.
 
This is a perfect example of a place where down votes make sense. The current releases of iOS are very buggy, the primary focus of any update should be stabilization with everything else a much lower priority.

Consider this post down voted.
 
Keyboard: In iOS 7.1 beta 3, Apple introduced a new design for the shift key, which was unpopular with many beta testers as it made it unclear when shift and caps lock were activated. With iOS 7.1 beta 5, Apple has tweaked the keys once again to make it clearer when shift and caps lock are enabled.

I wish they would make the case of the letters change as well. That would make it more obvious.
 
I'm amazed how much of these comments are part of the 'The iOS 7 keyboard should show CAPITAL letters with shift on and lower case letters with shift off' argument.

iOS 7.1 looks like it's going to be a solid, stable release. They seem to have been tweaking a ton of stuff, making it more secure, etc. This is all good.

We don't really expect new features with 7.* releases do we?
 
will we ever see the wallpaper move like it did in the prerelease of 7.0?

By moving i mean if it is a panoramic shot you can see the whole thing by moving your phone.
 
Any improvements to the calendar are greatly appreciated by me.

While I like many aspects of iOS7 I found the calendar app in iOS6 to be easier to use, understand and navigate and it gave me a better overview — I seriously miss this combined view (iOS6: month+what's happening today vs. iOS7: just the month):

calendar.png
 
Last edited:
I'm typing this on a MacBook, and my keyboard works exactly the same. You say "it should be dynamic". I promise you, if you used this for half an hour with the keyboard characters changing all the time when you are typing uppercase vs. lowercase letters, it would totally get on your nerves. You don't want unimportant things to change all the time and distract you from the real changes.

I dunno, I have been trying out a Nexus device for the past few months and have realized that I don't notice the case of the text on the keyboard changing.

I think the key (get it, lol) difference between a physical keyboard and a soft (on screen) one is the shift key isn't sticky on the physical one. You know you are typing a capital letter on a physical keyboard because the shift key has to be depressed. That distinction isn't necessarily true on the soft keyboard. The physical keyboard doesn't auto capitalize the first letter of the first word in a sentence for you, for example.
 
Wow, redesigned shift and caps lock... Apple, you are truly innovative!

Interesting, What would you expect in a late beta of a point release, a total UI rewrite? Seems to me ANY UI changes at this point would be a plus as they should be focused on fixing the issues that are broken and optimizing it under the hood. Not sure a late beta of a point release is where they get "innovative".
 
Date

I wish, really wish, Apple would put the DATE on the the display along with the TIME. Please!
 
The new UK Siri voices sound terrible and very robotic. I'm surprised they still can't get this right. I’ve switched to the US female voice as it’s about the only one I can tolerate.
connect your device to wifi and plug it in to charge. it will then download the higher quality voice data.
 
Last edited:
I used a jailbreak tweak once that enabled a lowercase keyboard. You know what I found? It's extremely disorienting and annoying to see the keyboard flip back and forth often. Every start of a new sentence you see it rapidly change back and forth because we type faster than we realize. Needless to say I deleted it within the day (I gave it a chance).

I think it's worth re-quoting this user's experience, because plenty of comments here accuse Apple of stupidity for not providing a 'dynamic' keyboard.

QuarterSwede hits the nail on the head. Such a keyboard would be utterly annoying for most people, I suspect.
 
Last edited:
Any improvements to the calendar are greatly appreciated by me.

While I like many aspects of iOS7 I found the calendar app in iOS6 to be easier to use, understand and navigate and it gave me a better overview — I seriously miss this combined view (iOS6: month+what's happening today vs. iOS7: just the month):

Image
Yup, that's there in 7.1.

----------

I wish, really wish, Apple would put the DATE on the the display along with the TIME. Please!
Probably not enough space up there to make it all look nice and not cluttered. The best you can do (short of jailbreaking) is to quickly bring down the notification center and see the day and date in the today section there.

----------

Keyboards and Siri voices and wallpapers, oh my! It doesn't take a lot to excite iPhone owners, does it? :rolleyes:
What else would anyone expect to change from a beta 4 to a beta 5? It would be rather bad and crazy if huge changes feed happening this late in the beta/release cycle.

----------

I think it's worth re-quoting this user's experience, because plenty of comments here accuse Apple of stupidity for not providing a 'dynamic' keyboard.

QuarterSwede hits the nail on the head. Such a keyboard would be utterly annoying for most people, I suspect.
Thats hard to say for sure really given that there are way more Android users out there that have such keyboards and they have been using them just fine.
 
I never realized the shift key was an issue for so many iOS users. The "perfect solution" wouldn't be for Apple to toggle between lower and upper case letters, it would be for you complaining to switch to an Android phone. The Apple keyboard works fine and takes .2 seconds to turn on your caps lock.

Apple has done a great job of being what Android is not, yet many people wish for them to adopt some of the same features used in Android phones? Sounds like something to just complain about.
 
Thats hard to say for sure really given that there are way more Android users out there that have such keyboards and they have been using them just fine.

Android users put up with a lot of bad stuff.
 
I haven't jailbroken since iOS 3, so am a but rusty, but are jailbreaks achieved through a security exploit? In other words, a potential vulnerability that could expose all iOS 7 users to malicious attacks? In theory, anyway. If so, and I believe the answer is YES, then Apple has an obligation to protect the mass majority of stock iOS 7 users from this risk, no matter haw small the risk is.

That's exactly what jailbreaking is. It exploits small holes and vulnerabilities in the OS which allows you to take it over and install/tweak things which wouldn't otherwise be possible. It leads to lots of illegal things such as the ability to download every app in the App Store for free. Apple should do everything they can to put a stop to jailbreaking. I've only ever jailbroken once or twice and, really, I couldn't see the benefit so it only lasted for about a week. Never again.

----------

Apple doesn't care if people add tweaks or extra settings to their phone; they only care about the security of the phone. It's just unfortunate that modifications and exploits go together.

Modifications ARE exploits in my opinion.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.