Do you think apple maps would have met with around 76% approval in a poll like this a year ago? I don't think so. I'm not even sure it would muster that now.
Outside of a minority of posters IOS 7 has not caused the same level of problems or had anything like the same negative reaction from the public and press generally that apple maps provoked. Most people actually get along with it just fine - and devices like the iPhone 5S, 5C and iPad Air etc all seem to have sold just fine off the back of it too. Why would anyone be apologising?
Initially when iOS 6 was announced, Apple's maps were not met with nearly the same kind of public scorn that iOS 7's design had when it was announced last year. The maps only became a problem once iOS 6 was launched but for iOS 7, the complaints about rail-thin fonts, overly saturated colors, hard-to-identify buttons, inconsistent icons and overly white spaced apps remain consistent to this day until Apple fully acknowledges the complaints and decides to fix them.
iOS 7 still hasn't completely grown on me and when I use devices still running iOS 6, it feels more welcoming and friendlier to use.All the people on this forum that are in love with iOS 7 and refuse to acknowledge any flaws always talk about how ugly iOS 6 and below suddenly is now and how they "cringe" by looking at it.
What makes me "cringe" is the fact that a much better designed OS was replaced by a half-baked and amateurishly designed one by the SAME FREAKING COMPANY!
When iOS 7 apologists taunt me into switching to Android or Windows, I always tell them how the alternatives aren't any better but it just sickens me that Apple, of all companies, would stoop to their level.
No one's asking for a return to the design iOS 6, people did want a new UI for iOS and while the overall philosophy of iOS 7 is great, its execution was terrible due to the fact that an industrial designer suddenly thinks he knows how to design software.
----------
Lose, not loose. You buy your apples loose, if you drop them you might lose one. One O. Anyway.
By attempting to channel the undead spirit of jobs into your side of the argument, you just invalidate it as far as I'm concerned. Yes jobs was great, yes jobs also released products and software with the occasional bugs in, yes jobs even released products that not everyone liked sometimes.
Oh and one of his defining characteristics? Embracing change. Skating where the puck is going to be rather than where it is. Never being afraid to ditch something, no matter how much people thought they needed it, in order to bring them something better. You think you'd be using IOS 6 still if he was around? Forget that.
First of all, if Steve Jobs was alive and still the CEO, there's no way in hell that he would've fired Scott Forstall therefore, iOS and OS X would keep the same overall design and we would be looking at a solid iOS 7 update with the probably the same features as we do now but no radical redesign and the battery and performance would most likely be better than it is now.
Change for the sake of change is against Apple's design philosophy and therefore, Cook and Ive betrayed one of their core principals to cave into market demands and to spite Forstall and remove his legacy as quickly as they could.