You have to wonder though, if they didn't have the foresight about a hotfix would it be that much more likely that they do have some sort of foresight into any other betas? If a report about the schedule was published just hours before the hotfix was actually released, that's a whole lot of not knowing of something that was clearly already in the works at least hours before when the report was published.
If the source didn't know about the hotfix, what else could the source not really know about? Also, if the report was released hours before the hotfix was released (which means that the hotfix was already in the works at the time the report was just being released) it's kind of strange not to know about it if you really have actual insider information.
That's true too. It's all mostly guessing until Apple says for sure one way or another, so until that happens none of it really matters much.
developer betas tend to be a few builds behind the internal builds, so they can plan a rough schedule to lead to GM.But sources that don't necessarily really know everything themselves either.Well it's not guessing really when there's sources
Some sources are more trustworthy than others (and often those sources simply--and I do mean simply--might comment on larger things, like dates of announcements, and not really next beta releases or something "minor" like that).They must know something, since a lot of the time they are right. Just like the sources saying about the announcement on 10th, with GM that day.
Mind you, I forget that you like to poo poo any conversation about when things come out unless Tim Cook tells you what's happening himself
