Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iOS 8 Likely to Bring Split-Screen Multitasking to the iPad
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I already can't keep more than one tab open on my retina iPad Mini because it's so memory-constrained. How would it manage to keep multiple apps open?
The jailbreak folks have apparently found that the iOS 7 kernel has memory compression built-in, but not enabled. I really hope they bring it to iOS 8. It would be essential to supporting split-screen apps on current hardware.
Apps would also need to scale correctly to many different sizes. This isn't something iOS apps have had to deal with before so I imagine running in split-screen mode would require explicit app support.
The jailbreak folks have apparently found that the iOS 7 kernel has memory compression built-in, but not enabled. I really hope they bring it to iOS 8. It would be essential to supporting split-screen apps on current hardware.
Apps would also need to scale correctly to many different sizes. This isn't something iOS apps have had to deal with before so I imagine running in split-screen mode would require explicit app support.
Exactly. Too bad the original article doesn't mention Samsung's also having split-screen multitasking in their tablets / higher-end phones, not only MS.
I think it depends on if this will be a "selling feature." However, I don't think Apple considered split screen important enough to be a marquee feature.
SO wait.... you have not even seen it, used it, and already make a bald prediction that it was worth it????? It may not even be true......
WOW!
just wow....
YES. This is in my top 3 desired features in iOS 8. Thought for sure we'd see it in iOS 7 after they showed it in Mavericks.
Actually, as I’ve posted before, multi-user/multi-profile could actually increase and/or sustain sales, plus create long[er] term customers as they buy into the Apple ecosystem (and add a Mac, a couple of AppleTVs, consume iTunes content, etc.)
It’s a simple business proposition. What’s better in the long run for Apple? Losing some sales of a 2nd iPad because one is easily shared (assuming accounts/profiles added), or losing a sale of an iPad to a competing product because it was cheaper to buy two, or it supported multiple users?
Factor in enterprise, government, etc, sales as well, and adding multiple user accounts becomes a pretty compelling business case.
...and here’s an actual real world use case supporting increased iPad sales if it supported multiple users
My two-year-old gets 30 minutes of iPad time each week with educational apps.
It'd be nice to know we could trust her with the iPad for those 30 minutes, and that she can switch between the handful of educational apps without accidentally deleting emails/pictures. Or worse, opening Netflix, which DOES have Human Centipede but DOES NOT have parental controls.
In short: I'm glad that you have the money to go buy your kid his/her own iPad. Some of us would prefer a cost-effective software solution.
I still don't get this. You want to compose a message in your current app? It will still interrupt you. What's the big deal with goings to messages and then back to your app?
Because Apple didn't patent slide to unlock. That's just a name given to the patent by the media. Perhaps you could read the actual claims of Apple's patent. They involve manipulating an image along a path to unlock an electronic device. Which was not on Windows CE in 2005.
Or from the mobile version of Safari in iOS 1.0.
Yep. Though I'm not sure how you steal something that doesn't belong to someone.
It's only hypocritical if you don't bother understand the details or place things in context.
Only on the iPad 4 and air probably
If it'll be indeed (artificially) restricted to newer models (to force people to upgrade, as is so frequently done by Apple), I have some good news: the recently-released JB windowing environment "OS Experience" runs just great on "old" hardware too. I've used it a lot on my iPad3 and found it excellent.
See https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1724497/ for more info.
I still don't get this. You want to compose a message in your current app? It will still interrupt you. What's the big deal with goings to messages and then back to your app?
Yeah, you can swipe but can you see the app that is not currently on the screen? Samsung did it right.
Here's a screenshot. The tweak was released about a week ago and admittedly I don't use the functionality very much yet, but it does work well and is more robust than the functionality described in this article
Safari + email and/or a video is my most likely use case.
Attachments
For example, when you DO need the other info remain visible. For example, when composing a mail in Mail to a non-copiable address (to avoid spam) shown in Safari. It's much easier to enter the address if you see it all the time than doing the same when you don't.
And that was just one example.
Oh, I get that, but in current size iPhone screens that will be hard. Maybe iPhone 6...
Web browser tabs can take up quite a bit of memory. That doesn't mean you couldn't have Pages and Twitter open at the same time though.
The other "solution" would be that it works like crap except on the iPad Air/Retina Mini 2
Well that was quick to have the first apologist reply...
Change goal posts much? All this board does is rally around apps that Apple did first that others copy; but now that Apple is doing something that Samsung did first on smartphones to not being a "Samsung first".
The hypocrisy on this forum is appalling.
I just logged on to see how many people who defended Apple's "multitasking" now would spin this around somehow. I won't be surprised when I see that Apple invented split window and Samsung copied them, lol.
Welcome Apple to 1994.
Welcome Apple to 1994.