You bet your a$$ Ballmer cares. He desparately wants to be relevant in the tablet space, but he still thinks that Windows 7(or 8) is the answer for tablets, even moreso, after the ARM announcement at CES.Does Microsoft really care?
I mean, they are primarily and always have been a software company. They don't make PC's they just sell a bucket load of software and make a bucket load of money in doing it, and by a mile are the most successful in the world at doing so.
Sure they make a few mice and keyboards, and have played with a MP3 player and have a nice gaming console out which is pretty much a world leader.
Are they going to fret about not have a own build tablet?
They can just write OS's and Apps for all other tablets and make a mint without having to worry about hardware.
If a product is first to the marketplace, that in itself is innovation. Apple took a chance on the form factor of a 10" tablet, the app store that they developed, and using an OS that they developed from scratch. Being that it was in another Apple device beforehand, makes it no less innovative. Here it still stands 4 years later, with no rivals as of yet, in terms of overall performance, function and layout.
Apple was also innovative when it comes to market strategy as well. They quickly ate up a large portion of supply of LCD screens, in order to delay the competitive product introduction timeline. They have also created an ecosystem that is unrivaled, and if they continue at current pace, I'm not sure how another tablet company is going to be able to compete from an app perspective. Developers will go where the guaranteed money is, not a gamble like the RIM Playbook or the Galaxy Tab.
I think it's mostly indicative of how poorly Balmer is running the company. They really have had no vision past lone-island Desktop. Then again, people said the same thing about the XBox.
Microsoft has more chance than anybody to succeed as a real compeditor. I think they're smart to wait and opt out at the moment and watch everyone else fail at the challenge. Every other tablet has been DOA in my book. This gives them time to come up with an entirely different strategy all together. I have no idea what they can come up with to at least take a nice slice out of the tablet market away from Apple. But it's better to opt out, then come up to the plate with a half finished product and tarnish your name like RIM.
I think competition is great but this is only the 2nd generation of the iPad, give them some more time. Apple didn't start to have real competition in the smart phone market until they had the iPhone 3GS out.
I think the HP Slate when it does arrive will be some good competition. The Web OS shows some real promise. I always did like the Palm OS and hopefully HP does some innovative things with it. But as far as the iPad just being a big iPhone. Then why can't those Android manufactures do the same and just make a big Android phone, then call it a tablet.
Microsoft has more chance than anybody to succeed as a real compeditor. I think they're smart to wait and opt out at the moment and watch everyone else fail at the challenge. Every other tablet has been DOA in my book. This gives them time to come up with an entirely different strategy all together. I have no idea what they can come up with to at least take a nice slice out of the tablet market away from Apple. But it's better to opt out, then come up to the plate with a half finished product and tarnish your name like RIM.
Only 128 TB???
I actually have no doubt that Microsoft, with some of the best programmers in the world I would guess, can come up with an OS and apps for any type of device they really put their mind to.
Their size of course does seem to make this a slower process than other companies.
I can see some type of windows tablet in the future, and when I say windows, I don't mean windows as we know it.
I mean a new OS, but with some familiar windows look/feel about it, just to in some way make it feel familiar to people, but a ground up touch based OS.
Then create touch based versions of all their most popular programs.
Who knows what the market will look like in a few years time.
I'm fully aware the tablet thing, may in part be a bit of a fad.
Tablets will of course still be around, but who knows if they will just be the 3rd device.
They may be scrambling a bit at the moment, hence little real competition for the iPad but rest assured they will catch up.
Not anti-Apple by any means, I love my iPad, Mac`s etc. BUT I do like to see healthy competition or you end up with a "Windows" situation.
I really want to see Motorola, HTC, RIM, HP etc pushing Apple to keep ahead.
I can see Apples share of the consumer Tablet market being less than 70% and falling by the end of 2011. (Just imo).
Calling an iPad a big iPhone is as dumb as calling a t-shirt a shirt but with short sleeves.
A swimming pool is just a big bathtub.
A swimming pool is just a small lake.Which reminds me, a bathtub is just a big sink![]()
Don't think it will be a "window" thing, but rather another ipod situation. Apple is still maintaining its itune music ways.
I think they're more similar than not. Music players and tablets aren't essential items, like how phones or main computers are. They're luxury.I don`t feel that the 2 products are directly comparable, although I do get your point.
There is no way that Apple will be able to maintain an iPod-like dominance over the tablet market in the long term, different market types.
Apple always has percieved higher quality amongst average consumers anyway. Having a killer price too, just seals the deal.
HP/Palm is the only hope left, of a major player getting it right at launch, but by having a gap so huge(5-6 months) between unveiling and shipping product, could mean that it'll be too late for it to capture the public's attention, like the Palm Pre.I love the iPad but competition is good for innovation and pricing.
Hope the other guys can get their products competitive in the near future otherwise Apple will continue to slowly bring their products up to market.