Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Calling an iPad a big iPhone is as dumb as calling a t-shirt a shirt but with short sleeves.
 
Does Microsoft really care?

I mean, they are primarily and always have been a software company. They don't make PC's they just sell a bucket load of software and make a bucket load of money in doing it, and by a mile are the most successful in the world at doing so.

Sure they make a few mice and keyboards, and have played with a MP3 player and have a nice gaming console out which is pretty much a world leader.

Are they going to fret about not have a own build tablet?

They can just write OS's and Apps for all other tablets and make a mint without having to worry about hardware.
You bet your a$$ Ballmer cares. He desparately wants to be relevant in the tablet space, but he still thinks that Windows 7(or 8) is the answer for tablets, even moreso, after the ARM announcement at CES.
Ballmer thinks that the only reason Windows 7 hasn't worked on tablets thus far, is purely down to the current ARM chips not powerful enough. He absolves Windows of all blame. :D
 
I agree about the lack of competition. My friend has a Xoom and my god was it awful. All those ridiculous widgets, and it was so patty just transitioning from screen to screen. I was really disappointed. Maybe hp can catch up, but I'm not optimistic based on my last, and I mean last in every sense, pc laptop that had so many problems and finally just died.
Also, this market is new. When I switched from pc to Mac, I didn't really have anything to lose. If I wanted to go to android now, I would lose all of the iOS apps I've purchased. Give apple a few generations, as in one more, and other companies are going to have a really hard time gaining ground.
I total agree with the iPod analogy. There isn't a viable alternative to such a polished product. The iPad mint be that new product.
 
If a product is first to the marketplace, that in itself is innovation. Apple took a chance on the form factor of a 10" tablet, the app store that they developed, and using an OS that they developed from scratch. Being that it was in another Apple device beforehand, makes it no less innovative. Here it still stands 4 years later, with no rivals as of yet, in terms of overall performance, function and layout.

Apple was also innovative when it comes to market strategy as well. They quickly ate up a large portion of supply of LCD screens, in order to delay the competitive product introduction timeline. They have also created an ecosystem that is unrivaled, and if they continue at current pace, I'm not sure how another tablet company is going to be able to compete from an app perspective. Developers will go where the guaranteed money is, not a gamble like the RIM Playbook or the Galaxy Tab.

Good perspective.
 
I think it's mostly indicative of how poorly Balmer is running the company. They really have had no vision past lone-island Desktop. Then again, people said the same thing about the XBox.

Microsoft has more chance than anybody to succeed as a real compeditor. I think they're smart to wait and opt out at the moment and watch everyone else fail at the challenge. Every other tablet has been DOA in my book. This gives them time to come up with an entirely different strategy all together. I have no idea what they can come up with to at least take a nice slice out of the tablet market away from Apple. But it's better to opt out, then come up to the plate with a half finished product and tarnish your name like RIM.
 
Microsoft has more chance than anybody to succeed as a real compeditor. I think they're smart to wait and opt out at the moment and watch everyone else fail at the challenge. Every other tablet has been DOA in my book. This gives them time to come up with an entirely different strategy all together. I have no idea what they can come up with to at least take a nice slice out of the tablet market away from Apple. But it's better to opt out, then come up to the plate with a half finished product and tarnish your name like RIM.

Fair point, except Microsoft aren't waiting, they aren't opting out and aren't smart. They are throwing their money resources and time behind adapting Windows 7 for tablets. Something that is proving troublesome and costly for them. It was said by Microsoft themselves that they pulled the team that worked on Windows 7 desktop and transferred them to adapting it for the mobile market.
A previous poster also said about Microsoft coming out with a "from the ground up" touch based OS for tablets. Ummmm this is Microsoft right?

Every version of Windows is based on the same failings of the last with a few more bells and whistles (which prompted me to go to the Mac in the first place). Office is the same, Windows mobile the same.... Seeing a pattern here?

Microsoft don't do from the ground up.
 
I think competition is great but this is only the 2nd generation of the iPad, give them some more time. Apple didn't start to have real competition in the smart phone market until they had the iPhone 3GS out.

I think the HP Slate when it does arrive will be some good competition. The Web OS shows some real promise. I always did like the Palm OS and hopefully HP does some innovative things with it. But as far as the iPad just being a big iPhone. Then why can't those Android manufactures do the same and just make a big Android phone, then call it a tablet.

The mistake right now as a competitor is to choose Android as your OS. Google is really dicking it's partners. Google needs to stand up and take blame honestly.

I'm curious to see of Amazon will take a stab at it. If they do, they need create their own OS like rim has and go with Android Apps. Amazon has the Eco system to compete, but they can't get poked in the butt like everybody else by Google.

All google wants to do is sell ads and they are using the hell out of their partners with that crappy OS.

Android Developers aren't making any real money. Google's partners aren't making any money from sells of the devices. Android is on every piece of hardware except Apples which means Google is making tons of money from the ads on these devices. Google is nothing but a pimp thinking all about themselves.

I mean, in the end, it's all about making money, but Google doesn't have a real plan to make sure everybody eats, from Google, to their partners, to their developers.
 
Last edited:
Microsoft has more chance than anybody to succeed as a real compeditor. I think they're smart to wait and opt out at the moment and watch everyone else fail at the challenge. Every other tablet has been DOA in my book. This gives them time to come up with an entirely different strategy all together. I have no idea what they can come up with to at least take a nice slice out of the tablet market away from Apple. But it's better to opt out, then come up to the plate with a half finished product and tarnish your name like RIM.

Which is exactly why Windows Phone 7 has been a runaway success that has shown itself to be serious competition in the marketplace against iOS and Android...
 
I actually have no doubt that Microsoft, with some of the best programmers in the world I would guess, can come up with an OS and apps for any type of device they really put their mind to.

Their size of course does seem to make this a slower process than other companies.

I can see some type of windows tablet in the future, and when I say windows, I don't mean windows as we know it.

I mean a new OS, but with some familiar windows look/feel about it, just to in some way make it feel familiar to people, but a ground up touch based OS.

Then create touch based versions of all their most popular programs.

Who knows what the market will look like in a few years time.

I'm fully aware the tablet thing, may in part be a bit of a fad.
Tablets will of course still be around, but who knows if they will just be the 3rd device.

Well the market is waiting...and has been for quite a while.

I'm not sure where you got this idea that MS has programers that make new and exciting stuff...at least not a large number of them. All the Windows releases have been very evolutionary, and I expect Windows 8 to be similar.
MS doesn't seem to want to taking Windows Phone 7 to the tablet, which is one of the few revolutionary pieces of software they have. Google has a been able to push one impressive software much quicker then anyone else, although they took some design hints from Apple(to make its a touch screen, prior to iOS being announced, Android looked like BlackBerry OS) Apple did spend a ton of time on software which would become parts of iOS, although they didn't really put effort into a phone themselves until the Moto ROKR failed. And then there is Palm, now part of HP, released an impressive OS after quite a while of sitting around with there market share falling.

Windows Phone 7 should be MS's tablet plan. Apple, HP and Google are all following that model, and while I like that MS is trying to blaze its own trail, being so far behind in the tablet and phone game, now is not the time to attempt to reinvent the market considering how both of these markets recently relaunched


Hopefully they get a nice touch skin, but still so much effort being focused on porting to ARM, who knows what type of eye candy MS will put in.
 
They may be scrambling a bit at the moment, hence little real competition for the iPad but rest assured they will catch up.

Not anti-Apple by any means, I love my iPad, Mac`s etc. BUT I do like to see healthy competition or you end up with a "Windows" situation.

I really want to see Motorola, HTC, RIM, HP etc pushing Apple to keep ahead.
I can see Apples share of the consumer Tablet market being less than 70% and falling by the end of 2011. (Just imo).

Don't think it will be a "window" thing, but rather another ipod situation. Apple is still maintaining its itune music ways.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8H7 Safari/6533.18.5)

I love apple products but it's good for consumers if there is strong competition to push apple to innovate. It blows my mind how these companies keep coming out with garbage tablets with no apps. I bought the xoom and returned it 2 days later. All apps would crash and while playing music and surfing the web, the music would skip and pause when looking at heavy use websites
 
Yes you need an iPad, now that you have posted and Steve knows your looking you only have a short time before he tracks you down and ahm, let's just say you need to buy one quick or else.:eek::apple:
 
Don't think it will be a "window" thing, but rather another ipod situation. Apple is still maintaining its itune music ways.

I don`t feel that the 2 products are directly comparable, although I do get your point.

There is no way that Apple will be able to maintain an iPod-like dominance over the tablet market in the long term, different market types.

Just wait until the competition properly gets its act together.

I`m a big Apple fan and love my iPad but their current dominance of this sector is unsustainable in the long-term, too much competition in the pipeline.

Like I say, I want to see Apple pushed, and pushed hard, so they don`t get too comfortable and complacent.
 
I don`t feel that the 2 products are directly comparable, although I do get your point.

There is no way that Apple will be able to maintain an iPod-like dominance over the tablet market in the long term, different market types.
I think they're more similar than not. Music players and tablets aren't essential items, like how phones or main computers are. They're luxury.
If they're essential, price usually rules over quality, for the most part(my main reasoning for the Android smartphone marketshare numbers).
Apple always has percieved higher quality amongst average consumers anyway. Having a killer price too, just seals the deal.
 
Apple always has percieved higher quality amongst average consumers anyway. Having a killer price too, just seals the deal.

Considering Apple's usually higher priced items compared to competitors, it's amazing that their iPads are cheaper than Xoom. Cook must've worked his magic with the suppliers
 
Ipad 2

A rumor from a Verizon sales guy. He said "the Ipad 2 is going to be very difficult to get because the factory that makes them was destroyed in Japan."

I am a newbie to the board as well as first time Apple purchaser.

At the same store, an employee was flip flopping so bad I didn't know what to do. I didn't purchase.

I went to Best Buy where you can't order because of the sporadic delivery of goods.

One salesman hid the last Ipad 2, 64 gb, wifi 3G. I was determined to ask several staffers.

One sales guy said they had one, 64 gb, wifi, 3G ATT. I just wanted a 16 gig wifi but I bought it anyway. This is my first venture into Apple, I hope it goes well.
 
If you stop to think about it. Microsoft have some amazing talent at their disposal, and, with Windows 7 have an amazing product.

Consider how easy Apple have it, they have a tiny fixed selection of standard hardware to make their OS run on, and even then they have bugs to fix.

Just imagine having to write a solid and reliable OS that can run on probably a million or many million combinations of different hardware and chipsets.

Motherboard, CPU's, GPU's, Memory, etc etc etc, all from many countries around the world, all bolted together in a myriad of permutations, and expecting to buy Windows install it on their home made combination of hardware, perhaps mixing items brought today with other items bought 5+ years ago, and for it to work reliably.

That is some massive achievement and a giant ask of any piece of software to cope with.
I could never imagine Apple being able to handle such a task at the current time.

I'm not Pro Microsoft, in case you get this feeling, I am pro the openness of windows and anti the closed path Apple it heading down as I can see bad things in the future.

I've no doubt, in time Msoft will come up with something, Who knows, perhaps in the future they will have a tablet that runs Xbox360 games?

There's a long long way to go now, and I'm sure things are going to change a lot in the medium to long term.
 
I love the iPad but competition is good for innovation and pricing.
Hope the other guys can get their products competitive in the near future otherwise Apple will continue to slowly bring their products up to market.
 
I love the iPad but competition is good for innovation and pricing.
Hope the other guys can get their products competitive in the near future otherwise Apple will continue to slowly bring their products up to market.
HP/Palm is the only hope left, of a major player getting it right at launch, but by having a gap so huge(5-6 months) between unveiling and shipping product, could mean that it'll be too late for it to capture the public's attention, like the Palm Pre.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.