I'm still using a prehistoric 3G, it's about time to replace this thing. I can't wait, I hope this includes a 64GB option and this new A5 processor.
You use an iPad differently than I do...
Completely agree. It's like looking at a first-generation NES video game. lol
I'm basing that mostly on the video that was released a week or two ago now, and assuming that the second phone was the iPhone 5. The internals weren't just upgraded; they were all different.I'm curious how people assume the term "redesigned" applies to only the internals. If I were to upgrade all the internals of the systems I manage, the term "redesigned" doesn't come to mind to describe it.
So does the iPhone. Sometimes I hold it closer, sometimes I hold it farther away.
However, when dealing with things like "marketing", you have to normalize, just like Steve did when he declared 12" to be the normal viewing distance one holds a smartphone at. Obviously, this won't be true for every user everywhere.
Same goes for the iPad. Apple will just "normalize" a distance where the display they pick achieves the Retina effect so they can then call it a Retina display.
---
No, he never said what you are saying he said. He explained the concept real clearly. Read the article I linked to.
Steve said that the Retina effect was your eye not able to distinguish pixels at the normal viewing distance you hold the device. He then qualified it as 12" distance for the iPhone, and thus a requirement of 300 ppi to achieve this effect.
The iPhone 4 numbers were an example as much as an introduction to the iPhone 4 display. He clearly stated however what was meant by Retina Display.
Where did you think all of us trying to explain it to you guys are getting this info ? Retina Display is an Apple Marketing strategy, they invented the term, the concept and the explanation behind it. We're just repeating it for you and others that just aren't getting it. Retina display is not something that existed as a "concept" or "industry slang" before the words came out of Steve's mouth on that faithful day in June of '10.
Completely agree. It's like looking at a first-generation NES video game. lol
To the contrary, some of us didn't buy the first gen iPad because the resolution sucked. It's not that it shuts down and stops working, it was never up to par to begin with. The problem is the companies are so intent on holding back features so they'll have something "better" for the next year's revamp, but what they fail to realize is that there is always a way to make the product better. The second or third gen iPad will be what the first one should have been. As consumers we can either buy into the crappy products until they catch up or sit around and wait, but either way it takes the same three years.There's no reasoning with the tech spec crowd, their stuff obviously shuts down and stops working the minute a new gadget hits the market.
By today's technology standards, yes, the display on iMacs is pretty poor, too. And they've been behind the game on the laptop front for AGES now. 15" panels at 1920x1200 resolution have been around for nearly a decade now. Their base 15" MBP is a paltry 1440x900. That's pathetic.Or your Mac's display.![]()
The bit in bold is pretty interesting...
Sounds like the next iPhone will actually be a a significant upgrade rather than a 3gs type upgrade.
Thoughts?
http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/14/exclusive-the-future-of-the-ipad-2-iphone-5-and-apple-tv-and/
By today's technology standards, yes, the display on iMacs is pretty poor, too. And they've been behind the game on the laptop front for AGES now. 15" panels at 1920x1200 resolution have been around for nearly a decade now. Their base 15" MBP is a paltry 1440x900. That's pathetic.
Anyway, there is a difference here though, in that you generally sit farther away from a laptop or iMac display, whereas you hold the iPad in your hands and view it from a distance of a foot from your face.
sooooooooo this means Verizon will dick over the buyers that purchased in February and come out with a new one 4 months later? Great!!! Or this is still just part of the att yearly release?
Personally I feel, it's as dumb as the red nub stick on thinkpads. Lenovo still have not changed that lineup's design at all for how many years now?
sooooooooo this means Verizon will dick over the buyers that purchased in February and come out with a new one 4 months later? Great!!! Or this is still just part of the att yearly release?
No more than all the other providers all over the world that continue to sell the iP4 right up to the launch date of the iP5.
By now it's a pretty well established trend that Apple releases a new model once a year like clockwork. Especially with all the press Apple gets. It's the customers decision, and they should hardly be surprised.
it's not fair to consumers ... at least let people know a new one in out in June so people ... can wait will wait till June. I know they will never do that because again, This is all business ... But I jus think it's bad for their rep on Apple and Verizons side.
No more than all the other providers all over the world that continue to sell the iP4 right up to the launch date of the iP5.
By now it's a pretty well established trend that Apple releases a new model once a year like clockwork. Especially with all the press Apple gets. It's the customers decision, and they should hardly be surprised.
Sounds like the next iPhone will actually be a a significant upgrade rather than a 3gs type upgrade.
Thoughts?
A multicore processor in a phone? It seems like just yesterday the razr was the hottest thing ever.
I'm basing that mostly on the video that was released a week or two ago now, and assuming that the second phone was the iPhone 5. The internals weren't just upgraded; they were all different.
That, coupled with the fact that the antenna is all new as well (and apparently universal) says to me redesigned. If they meant it would have an all-new form factor, they would've said "all-new form factor." Just like they did with the iPhone 4, even though no one believed it at the time.
What do folks think the likelihood that the chipset would allow Verizon use in the USA and sim card use in Europe?This chipset change will also advance to the iPhone 5, again allowing a single hardware model to work across both Verizon and AT&T.
i'd love to have a pay as you go data plan. the rates are ridiculous. why pay for internet in a small device if i already pay for broadband through cable?
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; sv-se) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)
I highly doubt that apple would chose a number naming for just one phone and then just jump back into adding a bunch of letters after it. I expect the following iPhones to be called 5, 6
iPhone 3G begets iPhone 3GS begets iPhone 4 begets iPhone 4G. There is prescient.
I don't expect any new industrial design of the iPhone for another eighteen months nor an iPhone 5 before spring 2012. My take is at WWDC this year, we will see the iPhone 4G with the same look at the iPhone 4 and a totally redone motherboard inside.