The iPad mini to me clearly compromises Apple's "we want to make the best product possible"-incentive. Don't know how I feel about that.
Totally agree here... this is a big miss on Apple part. And makes that statement meaningless.
The iPad mini to me clearly compromises Apple's "we want to make the best product possible"-incentive. Don't know how I feel about that.
The need for iPad Mini 3 decreased significantly with the introduction of iPhone 6 Plus and thinner, lighter iPad Air. And looks like apple lost faith in it too.
"The display on the iPad Air 2 [...] is actually slightly lower in performance than the original iPad Air (for example 8% lower Brightness and 16% lower display Power Efficiency) most likely the result of an obsession with producing a thinner Tablet forcing compromises in the LCD backlight"
Thin-ness madness....
The iPad Mini 3 was intentionally shafted as it's quickly become the show-stopper iPad everyone wants. They could have easily given it the A8, ect.
Why would someone buy the iPad Air, if the Mini has the same processor, same resolution, same performance, and is $100 cheaper?
The iPad mini to me clearly compromises Apple's "we want to make the best product possible"-incentive. Don't know how I feel about that.
just sold my wife's iPad mini no need for a 6+And a small iPadReally how difficult would it have been for Apple to rev the mini and add:
- A8
- Bonded display
- Anti reflective coating
- TouchID
Most people would probably have been happy with that....but instead they are treating it like the iPod.
-Kevin
And how does this impact me as an end user? I don't remember any review complaining about brightness. I'm getting my Air 2 today. Is 8% lower brightness going to give me a bad experience and cause me to return the device?
I think people underestimate the resources of Apple...they only focus on a few things at a time. That's why they should reduce the amount of products they have.
Really how difficult would it have been for Apple to rev the mini and add:
- A8
- Bonded display
- Anti reflective coating
- TouchID
Most people would probably have been happy with that....but instead they are treating it like the iPod.
-Kevin
The anti-reflective coating is definitely noticeable side by side. The original Air looks like a mirror, with the display off, while the Air 2 still shows outlines of things but far less detail and less bright.
In the real-world with the screen on it seems slightly better, the main problem is the backlight gets overpowered by the sun.
I disagree. I upgraded from the Mini 2 to the Air 2 and like the thinness. It makes a difference with the overall size of the device and how it feels in hand. I tried the original Air last year but went with the Mini 2 as it was essentially the same apart from the display.
... Why would anyone buy a 6+ and a Mini 3? doesn't make sense but people may surely buy a 6+ and an iPad Air 2. my 2cents
264 ppi is out of date. I can see individual pixels.
I think Apple would rather you buy an iPhone 6+ instead of a iPad Mini 3 which is why they didn't do much to it.
I think Apple would rather you buy an iPhone 6+ instead of a iPad Mini 3 which is why they didn't do much to it. Also I think they really would rather you buy an iPad Air 2 now instead of a mini 3. I don't think it would make business sense for them to make the Mini 3 as powerful as the Air or 6+. I think the 6+ is meant to cannibalize the Mini's and the Air's will be the 3rd device. iPhone 6 or 6+ iPad Air and Macbook Pro. Why would anyone buy a 6+ and a Mini 3? doesn't make sense but people may surely buy a 6+ and an iPad Air 2. my 2cents
I love my Air 2 but I feel sorry for those who were looking forward to a decent Mini 3 that were let down big time by Apple.