Fixed for you![]()
Fix what, consumer perception?
There's no fixing that.
Fixed for you![]()
What is going on here? Waiting for the Android folks to offer explanations. This can't be true. Windows and Android are not bags of malware, have stable and robust OS, and perfect in design. Anyone? Hello?
Edit: Spoke too soon. Looks like they are already trickling in to correct us Apple folks on our misunderstanding of Apple's superior products and success.
Latest news: if we modify what constitutes a PC
The flaw in your logic is that you seem to see only that definition of a "computer" that fits the tasks you use it for, and this isn't what many people see a "computer" as, nor should they. "Computers" don't need to be as sophisticated as those at levels above it in order to be considered a "computer." "Super-computer" products are arguably far more capable than the consumer's "computer", but this does not make neither super-computers nor consumer computers any less of a computer. If you want to advise someone to get something with more "computing power" than the iPad, then that's a valid argument, but to say that the iPad isn't compatible with the definition of a "computer" is somewhat myopic and arbitrary. The iPad may not be the best choice for many intensive computing/tasks, but consumer computers may not be the best choice for intensive, hour/day-long computations that super-computers tackle. The fact that we're speaking of "personal" computers just qualifies the iPad even further as a computing device that is considerably personal.
Because they are just as much a pc as an iPad is a pc, although Apple fanboys zealots will try to wrongly dispute that. We should also include in navigation systems as pcs too.
Fix what, consumer perception?
There's no fixing that.
Meriam-Webster Dictionary:
"A general-purpose computer equipped with a microprocessor and designed to run especially commercial software (as a word processor or Internet browser) for an individual user."
Wikipedia:
"A personal computer (PC) is any general-purpose computer whose size, capabilities, and original sales price make it useful for individuals, and which is intended to be operated directly by an end-user with no intervening computer operator...."
"Software applications for personal computers include, but are not limited to, word processing, spreadsheets, databases, Web browsers and e-mail clients, digital media playback, games, and myriad personal productivity and special-purpose software applications. Modern personal computers often have connections to the Internet, allowing access to the World Wide Web and a wide range of other resources. Personal computers may be connected to a local area network (LAN), either by a cable or a wireless connection. A personal computer may be a desktop computer or a laptop, tablet, or a handheld PC."
Columbia Encyclopedia 6th edition
"Personal computer (PC), small but powerful computer primarily used in an office or home without the need to be connected to a larger computer. PCs evolved after the development of the microprocessor made possible the hobby-computer movement of the late 1970s, when some computers were built from components or kits. In the early 1980s the first low-cost, fully assembled units were mass-marketed. The typical configuration consists of a video display, keyboard, mouse, logic unit and memory, storage device and, often, a modem ; multimedia computers add a sound-reproduction adapter, stereo speakers, and a compact disc (CD-ROM) drive to this configuration so that material can be presented in a combination of animation, graphics, sound, text, and video. Decreases in component size have made it possible to build portable PCs, or laptops, the size of a ream of paper and smaller, and palmtops , which can be held in one hand..."
A MacBook does not have serial or parallel ports, and can't print to the millions of serial and parallel printers sold (much less the teletypes and line-printers that came before). Yet a MacBook is a computer. The market moves on to new peripherals.a)cannot print...oh, unless you count the 8 magical printers out of the thousands.
b)does not have standard i/o interfaces such as USB
Like my MacBook Air. Personal computer or not?c)non-replaceable battery (compared to PC laptops)
d)completely non self-serviceable (ram, drive, general cleaning, etc)
As the world lives on, sure, the definition of PC will change, SLOWLY, over time.
so the iPod Touch is a PC too then?
iPad is our most advanced technology in a magical and revolutionary device at an unbelievable price, said Steve Jobs, Apples CEO. iPad creates and defines an entirely new category of devices that will connect users with their apps and content in a much more intimate, intuitive and fun way than ever before.
http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/01/27Apple-Launches-iPad.html
No where in the press release does Apple refer to this device as a "PC".
If you Google "Can an iPad replace a PC" and you will discover that most articles will agree that it cannot.
If we stretch the traditional definition of "PC" just far enough, we can squeeze the iPad into that category. But in my most humble opinion, the iPad is a supplement to the PC for most users.
No, I'd advise people to have access to a true computer as the iPad and other tablet computers still arn't fully compatible with the Internet. Yes they do a lot of websites correctly but take BMWs used car website for instance. The iPad does a horrible job of rendering it making it impossible to navigate. The touch interface can make this worse as the flick to scroll and others doesn't always work when a menu is embedded on a page Yes this is down to a need for website creators to allow create web pages that are compatible across both platforms and no I don't think a 'mobile' website version is the answer either as these tend to be compromise and not offer the full fat service of the desktop site offer (in my experience anyway). Some companies offer iPad optimised apps to take full advantage of websites but part of the glory of the www is you can offer a service to everyone through HTML standards rather than making an app for every Eco system!
To me, what you are describing is a WORK COMPUTER which is needed to do higher end computing and graphic design taks, programming tasks, etc.
What the iPad falls under to me is a PERSONAL COMPUTER...which is what an everyday person has at home. Most use their personal computer for getting on the internet, checking/replying to emails, social media, watching videos, listening to music, watching movies, playing mid level games.
Of course there are home power users and home HC game players that need a more powerful machine.
There are obviously the managers and higher ups that could get by with an iPad because they aren't really doing much work other then managerial things which the iPad handles just fine.
Now mind you, everyday more companies are hiring programmers to make Apps specific to their business for the iPad which then blurs the line more between work machines and tablets.
Would you care to qualify your claims with actual premises and evidence? Or would you rather continue making claims without ever arguing their validity? Constructing valid arguments can be a pretty rewarding experience if you ever bothered to venture down that path.
If you take tablets away, Apple for sure would rank the lowest.
Mac Pros are more a forgotten hobbie today than the Apple TV itself.
And I thought you were going to bring up the toaster as a PC argument because some of them have CPUs.
The definition of Personal Computer needs to evolve with the times.
An iPad is a PC as much as a hammer is a screwdriver!
Well, with Windows PCs the dinosaur of a dying technology-make room for the mammals- Mac to take over the world from the has-beens soon
1)As far as I am aware, all apps for the iPad must live in the App Store...free or for a fee. I cannot surf to a website and simply download a software title and install it...such as traditional shareware/freeware/trialware.
Hmmm.... No! My "Personal Computer" at home is used for playing online games which need a lot of graphic power and RAM you cannot squeeze into a tablet without loosing significant quality. It cannot have a second window open with my PTT chat open, an instruction page, forum, all on two monitors at once. It might be that the ARM gets better, having quadcores on the A6 as rumored, but they are far from a hexacore or octocore processor supporting all kinds of calculations on-die plus a graphics card having even more transistors than the CPU. For quite some more years, that is not gonna happen. Why? Because the AMD, Intel, and NVidia aren't sleeping either. Their progression will boost PC (nontablet) into realms of realism even an "Retina" iPad cannot compute on that level.
As I stated earlier, iPad is for consumers only using the iPad as a gadget. It is not a gaming PC. Look as 1st person games: Even though I don't really play them anymore, how the heck can you tell me can you navigate, aim, and move on a touch screen? Setting aside you use valuable screen real estate for the steering, it is not precise enough to make it realistic. Not comparable to keyboard and mouse.
There's a big difference though. My iMac can easily service my households entire needs, no matter how big or small, it supports multiple users and TRUELY is a house hold computer fit for all the family. The iPad doesn't even allow multiple users with different preferences. I think you have to stretch the pc definition putty far to fit the iPad in. And to me,min my opinion, tablets should be separated from the category of personal computers, just as a high end iMac shouldn't be in the same company as a cheap hp laptop.
You wouldn't expect to see Ferrari drawn into comparison with ford in a models sold per annum comparison would you
Not true. Anyone who enrolls for a developer certificate (several 100,000 people have) can download source code for some software from github, compile it with Xcode (locally on a Mac, or now with some remote services), and install it on their iPad. Lots of "free" open source apps. No App store needed.
I once saw some iPad app source code with a donate button, so shareware is possible as well (but probably not anywhere near as potentially lucrative as putting an app in the App store).