Those of us who bought the iPad as the appropriate tool for the job and like it don't want to hear about your poor consumer decision.
I strongly doubt that anybody bought an iPad "for the job", no matter what that specific job or task might be -- unless web surfing on the couch qualifies as a real job for a device.
I think the OP is 100% right: The iPad is a toy. There's nothing wrong with that.
But everything is wrong with trying to convince the entire world that the iPad could even remotely be "the appropriate tool for the job". I cannot even come with a fistful of things where the iPad would be the appropriate tool. Let me see:
1. A comic reader.
2. Electronic data capture - or rather: Using electronic checklists.
3. Play electronic versions of board games or other games that work well with a touch interface (Plants vs Zombies qualifies).
4. Use it as a remote control for something.
And now it already gets very difficult to find uses for it. And as you might have noticed, web surfing was NOT on my list, because the iPad's web browser completely sucks and only provides a crippled Internet experience.
The iPad is also a failure as an eBook reader -- Amazon's Kindle or other gadgets with an eInk display are MUCH better suited for that job.
You cannot do ANY serious writing/typing with an iPad.
It's too big to be a music player and it has not enough processing power to playback most DVD rips. (And since it doesn't have a DVD drive, DVD rips are the thing to measure it with.)
So... Can we get past the point where most of you folks still want to pretend that the current version of the iPad is actually really good at or for anything? It's a high-tech toy starting at USD 499, and for any serious work, you're much better off with a cheap PC notebook for the same price tag.