of course it does an iPad starts at 399 and iPhone starts at 99 or even less sometimes.
You must be new at this
Lol
Your actual price is more like $1200+ for that iPhone buddy
of course it does an iPad starts at 399 and iPhone starts at 99 or even less sometimes.
iPad 2 here going on 3.5 years. Almost 4. Next cycle I will upgrade though. Still a solid device for $420 that lasted me 4 years.
The contract is a sunk cost, you are paying it no matter what phone you get.
Over it's life it certainly is, but not when purchased. With the scarcity of BYOD plans in the US, the unsubsidized cost is near irrelevant.
It was only released 3 years ago.![]()
THIS!
However, dont get me started on their opinions of iOS7
Apple has enforced it's planned obsolescence to the cracking point of the public's goodwill. It's interesting that Steve Jobs stated that he didn't want to build TVs because the margins suck and there isn't enough "turnover." Apple's methods of forcing "turnover" have rubbed me the wrong way on more than one occasion. They can't take it much further before people (or at least I) decide that Apple just isn't worth it any more.
On that note, my iPad 2 is still running strong having faced frequent use by toddlers for years.
I replace my phone every 2 years. I have an iPad 2 that I have no desire to replace. It does it's job just fine.
Anyone who doesn't upgrade each time a new iPad comes out is a disloyal customer. Plain and simple.
Those are terrible graphs. If I ever displayed a graph like that at work I'd be walked out of the conference room. Anything that takes more than 3 seconds to decipher and takes away from the data at hand is useless.
For me, an iPad does last longer than a phone, but I doubt it will hit year 6 like my current MacBook...
A TV? Those are 10 years, no way my iPad 2 will still be good to go in 2022.
Totally agree with this. If we want to encourage Apple to continue driving innovation forward, we have to purchase the latest and greatest devices.
Also Apple can help though by killing software support for older devices much more quickly. 18 months of software updates should be the absolute limit and will stimulate incredible growth in upgrades.
totally agree. i can't look at this graph and quickly tell you the percentage of people who replace their iPhone in 1-2 days. at a glance, i'd say it's about 81%, but that would be way off. with a little more time i'd realize that that stat doesn't start at zero, and requires estimating at both the high and low end. roughly 81% - 37%. so... 44%... I'm already doing math, why not just show me the raw numbers???
or show the data the correct way and make a pie chart.
Anyone who doesn't upgrade each time a new iPad comes out is a disloyal customer. Plain and simple.
Totally agree with this. If we want to encourage Apple to continue driving innovation forward, we have to purchase the latest and greatest devices.
Also Apple can help though by killing software support for older devices much more quickly. 18 months of software updates should be the absolute limit and will stimulate incredible growth in upgrades.
Where I live, it is cheaper to buy ipad than iphone... how does that cope with your math?![]()
I haven't seriously considered upgrading my iPad 2 yet, I expect it will miss out on iOS 8 so I'll probably make it last until the next upgrades.
I've managed to get good use out of my Apple stuff over the years. Even though my Mac mini, retina MacBook Pro and iPhone 5 are recent models I'm still regularly using a 2006 MBP, a 2007 iPod classic, a 2004 iPod photo and 2004 iPod mini.
I had a bit of a scare this morning when the iPod classic wouldn't power up but thankfully I've managed to coax it back to life.
----------
It was only released 3 years ago.![]()
[url=http://cdn.macrumors.com/im/macrumorsthreadlogodarkd.png]Image[/url]
A new report by Consumer Intelligence Research Partners (CIRP) suggests iPad owners replace their tablets less frequently than their iPhone-owning counterparts, who upgrade almost every two years. The longer iPad replacement cycle may be more like the Mac, which tends to be replaced every 2-4 years, or possibly even televisions which have a five to 10-year ownership span. (Via Fortune)
The CIRP report, which surveyed 2,000 U.S. customers who purchased an iPhone, iPad or Mac in 2013, shows that almost half of iPad owners will go without their tablet, waiting a week or more to replace a broken, lost or stolen device. They also are twice as likely as iPhone owners to give their older iPad to friends or family members. This replacement rate could affect future sales, driving them down as the tablet market becomes saturated. In this scenario, consumers would hold onto an iPad for a longer period of time, and future first-time iPad owners would be more likely to receive an older iPad than buy a new one.
Even as competition increases and the tablet market slows, Apple still is the top tablet vendor worldwide with 36 percent market share, according to Gartner's March 2014 report. The Cupertino company sold a record 26 million iPads in Q1 2014 and 195 million tablets overall.
Article Link: iPad Lifecycle Mirrors Macs and Maybe Even TVs Rather Than iPhones
My wife just stay with iOS 6. She thinks iOS 7 is EXTREMELY ugly.
Apple has enforced it's planned obsolescence to the cracking point of the public's goodwill.