Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Just a thought… If Apple had considered 'stereo' to be an actual feature, I think they would have touted this at the launch. They didn't. In my mind, this supports my theory that it's really about overcoming some perceived issue (such as low volume, or inadvertently covering up a speaker), rather than adding stereo sound.
Yeah. The 10" iPad actually has two speaker elements, but the sound is directed to a single grille. They probably found that two small speakers capable of producing the same volume as a single large one were easier to fit inside the cramped space.
And then with the mini it was just so darned cramped that the only way to fit the two speakers was to separate them, and it ended up with stereo speakers as a side effect... it seems backwards, I know.
 
Pretty sure that kindle fire does not have dual stereo speakers.
That is true. The Kindle Fire's speaker isn't all that great.

The Kindle Fire HD, on the other hand, does have dual stereo speakers. Or, more specifically, two separate drivers on the top and two on the bottom (left and right in landscape mode).

----------

Would you even notice the difference with them so close together and the sound coming from below as you hold it?
Not unless you are a mouse.
 
The Kindle Fire HD, on the other hand, does have dual stereo speakers. Or, more specifically, two separate drivers on the top and two on the bottom (left and right in landscape mode).

Well exactly, stereo speakers consists of a pair of speakers, both by definition and by the plural 's'. Dual stereo speakers would be 2 pair of speakers, ie 4 in total. Counting the drivers is more than ridiculous, especially since the sound is pretty much guaranteed to be garbage compared to regular speakers.
 
Would you even notice the difference with them so close together and the sound coming from below as you hold it?

Nope. They should have put them on opposite sides. Now, there is simply no point in having these "stereo" speakers (apart from Apple's referring to them as "amazing" "stereo" ones), particularly not when iOS can't drive them in widened stereo mode (unlike, say, those of the Nokia N95).

----------

Even then the stereo effect is going to be crap because the speakers are still too close together.

The latter can be helped with decent stereo widening techniques used on, say, the Nokia N95.
 
Nope. They should have put them on opposite sides. Now, there is simply no point in having these "stereo" speakers (apart from Apple's referring to them as "amazing" "stereo" ones), particularly not when iOS can't drive them in widened stereo mode (unlike, say, those of the Nokia N95).

----------



The latter can be helped with decent stereo widening techniques used on, say, the Nokia N95.

If it is necessary, such stereo widening or 3D can be achieved through software. There is no need to relocate the speakers physically. But then again, maybe Apple software for speakers already does it, or maybe some jailbreak app or even AppStore app does it, I didn't check. My Sony Ericsson K800i had such effect and while its not that bad, its not much different, though you can feel some difference.
 
How can anyone tell if it's stereo if both speakers are right next to each other?

Seriously, that's about the worst "stereo" speaker layout I've ever seen. So if you're watching a movie (in landscape, obviously) it's "stereo" but all the sounds are still going to come from the right side of the screen, since that's where both speakers are?

I'm still skeptical.

I agree, having one speaker on the left AND right would be much better. But the sound is still better than only one speaker, as some of the channels are split up to the left or right for a bit more clarity. :p
 
Well exactly, stereo speakers consists of a pair of speakers, both by definition and by the plural 's'. Dual stereo speakers would be 2 pair of speakers, ie 4 in total. Counting the drivers is more than ridiculous, especially since the sound is pretty much guaranteed to be garbage compared to regular speakers.
You've obviously never heard the Fire HD.

Does it sound as good as reference speakers? No. Does it sound good? Yes. It is absolutely not garbage-sounding. I disagree that the number of drivers is irrelevant. It is not the sole factor in sound quality, and there is a point of diminishing returns, but in most cases, two drivers will sound better than one in a given form factor.
 
You've obviously never heard the Fire HD.

Does it sound as good as reference speakers? No. Does it sound good? Yes. It is absolutely not garbage-sounding. I disagree that the number of drivers is irrelevant. It is not the sole factor in sound quality, and there is a point of diminishing returns, but in most cases, two drivers will sound better than one in a given form factor.

Your right I haven't, but I have worked as a sound engineer. I haven't said that the amount of drivers is irrelevant, I'm sure it's possible to improve what you can achieve with small speakers like this but, it's still going to be different degrees of horrible.

I tried to show that they were stretching the truth not only in regards to the iPad but their own device as well. If they said "dual driver stereo speakers" fine, but they did not. You would not need reference speakers, just decent regular speakers in cabinets. Let's look at the copy:

Big sound. Compact design. With Kindle Fire HD 8.9", we put stereo speakers on both sides of the display for a wide stereo sound-field similar to that of a home stereo, then tuned them to better reproduce low notes. The result - deeper bass in your music, loud, rumbling movie soundtracks, and room-filling stereo sound without distortion, even at higher volumes.


No, just no!
 
Which only shows how stupid the whole 'HD' thing is.

1280x720 on a 50" screen = HD
1024x600 on a 8" screen = not HD

Guess which one will look sharper? Doesn't matter, apparently.

The 'HD' term made a little bit of sense when most every TV was between 27" and 50". The fact that the tech industry went on to use the phrase for every screen from 4" to 100" is to biggest bunch of crap they've pulled in quite some time. And this is an industry FULL of crap advertising to begin with.

This is not entirely true, while I do see why someone can easily think this way.

While the PPI might be higher on a 8" non HD tablet compared to a 50" HDTV, The picture itself is not the same.

For example lets say you have a frame in a movie that has a persons head in it. On the (1080p) HDTV screen the head in this frame lets say is diplayed using 500,000 pixels, while this exact same frame on the tablet may be made up of only 400,000 pixels. Although the movie may seem just as crisp, in reality you may be loosing details on the face.
 
I just would have thought that they would have waited to get the facts right...

Waited? Was there some reason for them to expect that the info Apple posted on their own website and that if they waited it would change or be clarified?

Apple says "speaker" and makes no mention of stereo on their website. I just don't see how people thinking it's one speaker (mono) is the fault of anyone but Apple.


Standards bodies can't be trusted anymore, they're not impartial. I am.

Thanks for clarifying that 720 actually is HD and that you're the only one who believes otherwise.


Yep, exactly this, but we live in label-land, where labels are what matters, not the concepts behind them. You could be 1 pixel off and therefore it wouldn't be HD, and since people judge based on labels only, a viewing 1 pixel fewer would be *hugely* inferior, since it's not "HD". Silly, really.

Well, even short one pixel you either have to crop the picture or rescale it. The line needs to be drawn somewhere - the fact is, the mini is unable to display HD content at the original resolution.
 
Well exactly, stereo speakers consists of a pair of speakers, both by definition and by the plural 's'. Dual stereo speakers would be 2 pair of speakers, ie 4 in total. Counting the drivers is more than ridiculous, especially since the sound is pretty much guaranteed to be garbage compared to regular speakers.

Stereo does not equal two speakers. Stereo is the illusion of directionality of sound: Stereophonic = Greek for solid + sound. You can create stereo with two or more speakers. A 5.1 setup is still stereo.

This is just as common a misconception as people somehow think schizophrenia = dual personality disorder. Both misconceptions annoy me just as much :p
 
It's a concept, stop parsing the words, which are a label. It's just a concept.

This all started out when over a discussion of the difference in business models between Amazon/Google/B&N and Apple. You posited that Apple wants to make a killing on everything they do, when in fact that is not true, their major source of revenue is hardware, everything else is there to create value in their hardware. The article link I provided even stated they make 1% from the App Store, which is hardly a "killing" as you suggest, it's (as the article states) merely a profitable "loss leader." The concept remains true.
A concept that was used inaccurately. The app store is not a loss leader. They plan to expand it and make it much more profitable. Just because it isn't the most profitable part of their business, doesn't mean its just there for hardware. It brings value in and of itself. No loss, no loss leader. Plain and simple.
 
Stereo does not equal two speakers. Stereo is the illusion of directionality of sound: Stereophonic = Greek for solid + sound. You can create stereo with two or more speakers. A 5.1 setup is still stereo.

It's not an illusion, the directionality is achieved by the speaker placement. The most common stereo signal is 2 channels, requiring 2 speakers, and in this case we know that there is no 5.1 involved.
 
Let's look at the copy:
...
No, just no!
I completely agree - the sound really is quite good for a 7" tablet - but it is most assuredly not as good as they claim. Well, unless you're used to a Bose home stereo. In that case, the Fire HD is likely superior.
 
Your right I haven't, but I have worked as a sound engineer. I haven't said that the amount of drivers is irrelevant, I'm sure it's possible to improve what you can achieve with small speakers like this but, it's still going to be different degrees of horrible.

I tried to show that they were stretching the truth not only in regards to the iPad but their own device as well. If they said "dual driver stereo speakers" fine, but they did not. You would not need reference speakers, just decent regular speakers in cabinets. Let's look at the copy:




No, just no!

Agree. For that you will need to have speakers much much bigger than found in any tablets. Besides tablets also don't have a dedicated subwoofer, so its even more impossible to have that deep and rich bass. I am not a sound pro, but I myself change and install my car audio systems (twice in last 2 cars) and I agree with you.
 
Honest mistake? Maybe they should have bought one and checked before they posted. That's not an honest mistake. That's publishing without a single shred of fact checking, which is simply ignorance.

First off, when Apple makes it sound like mono on their website, why should anyone have to buy one and check to find out the truth?

Second, how would they check it? With the speakers that close together it probably still sounds like mono to most people.

Amazon is not only wrong with the speakers. 1024x768 is HD resolution and iTunes offers HD movies, even 1080p.

False, HD starts at 720x1280. And they're not talking about what is available for sale, they're talking about what can be displayed on the device.


If audio is amplified in mono (one speaker), then the source sounds are mixed differently to stereo. So it doesn't matter how far apart they are, the actual audio itself will sound different regardless.

"Different"? Sure. But it's going to sound different between any two devices that have different speakers. What I'm saying is that proper stereo imaging requires proper speaker placement. And putting both speakers on the same side of the screen is terrible speaker placement. Maybe it sounds a tiny bit better than one mono speaker, but it's still vastly inferior to having the speakers on opposite sides of the screen (particularly in landscape).


But really, stereo speakers on a tablet or phone are useless. Stereo works by playing varied sounds into each ear. If you have only two tiny speakers, right next to each other, firing sound from the same direction--you will hear mono anyway.

Look at where the speakers are on the Kindle HD. Having them on opposite sides is going to provide a much better stereo image, and one that the user is actually going to hear. If every tablet had a layout as brain dead as the mini, it would be worthless but thankfully some companies are doing it right.
 
It's not an illusion, the directionality is achieved by the speaker placement. The most common stereo signal is 2 channels, requiring 2 speakers, and in this case we know that there is no 5.1 involved.

How is it not an illusion? If sound sounds like it is coming from right in front of you, but you have one speaker to your left and one to your right, there is no physical thing that is going on to create sound coming from the center. It is you brain interpreting level and time differences from those two sources, creating the illusion that sound is coming from in front of you.

The 2 and 5.1 examples were just an example as to the fact that both can be stereo.

In this case I'd hardly call the two speakers stereo as they are too close together to create any appreciable time or level difference - apart from maybe the very highs, effectively sounding like a single source.
 
LOL at anyone thinking that the iPad mini will produce stereo sound for its users. Absolutely hilarious.
 
How is it not an illusion? If sound sounds like it is coming from right in front of you, but you have one speaker to your left and one to your right, there is no physical thing that is going on to create sound coming from the center. It is you brain interpreting level and time differences from those two sources, creating the illusion that sound is coming from in front of you.

In this case I'd hardly call the two speakers stereo as they are too close together to create any appreciable time or level difference - apart from maybe the very highs, effectively sounding like a single source.

In the second paragraph you answer your own question.

The 2 and 5.1 examples were just an example as to the fact that both can be stereo.

Yes, but I tried to appeal to take context into consideration.
 
Dual mono does not mean two speakers playing one feed. And in fact, it is usually used in recording contexts rather than in playback.

While you're correct about recording, I'd argue that the term is appropriate for mono playback over two speakers. If you don't like the term, what would you suggest as an alternative?


If it is necessary, such stereo widening or 3D can be achieved through software.

Not in landscape mode. And positioning the speakers as far apart as possible is always going to be superior to processing to try and make it seem wider.
 
While you're correct about recording, I'd argue that the term is appropriate for mono playback over two speakers. If you don't like the term, what would you suggest as an alternative?




Not in landscape mode. And positioning the speakers as far apart as possible is always going to be superior to processing to try and make it seem wider.

Of course, thats true. I only mentioned that its possible, not that its preferred.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.