Yeah. The 10" iPad actually has two speaker elements, but the sound is directed to a single grille. They probably found that two small speakers capable of producing the same volume as a single large one were easier to fit inside the cramped space.Just a thought… If Apple had considered 'stereo' to be an actual feature, I think they would have touted this at the launch. They didn't. In my mind, this supports my theory that it's really about overcoming some perceived issue (such as low volume, or inadvertently covering up a speaker), rather than adding stereo sound.
That is true. The Kindle Fire's speaker isn't all that great.Pretty sure that kindle fire does not have dual stereo speakers.
Not unless you are a mouse.Would you even notice the difference with them so close together and the sound coming from below as you hold it?
The Kindle Fire HD, on the other hand, does have dual stereo speakers. Or, more specifically, two separate drivers on the top and two on the bottom (left and right in landscape mode).
Would you even notice the difference with them so close together and the sound coming from below as you hold it?
Even then the stereo effect is going to be crap because the speakers are still too close together.
Nope. They should have put them on opposite sides. Now, there is simply no point in having these "stereo" speakers (apart from Apple's referring to them as "amazing" "stereo" ones), particularly not when iOS can't drive them in widened stereo mode (unlike, say, those of the Nokia N95).
----------
The latter can be helped with decent stereo widening techniques used on, say, the Nokia N95.
How can anyone tell if it's stereo if both speakers are right next to each other?
Seriously, that's about the worst "stereo" speaker layout I've ever seen. So if you're watching a movie (in landscape, obviously) it's "stereo" but all the sounds are still going to come from the right side of the screen, since that's where both speakers are?
I'm still skeptical.
You've obviously never heard the Fire HD.Well exactly, stereo speakers consists of a pair of speakers, both by definition and by the plural 's'. Dual stereo speakers would be 2 pair of speakers, ie 4 in total. Counting the drivers is more than ridiculous, especially since the sound is pretty much guaranteed to be garbage compared to regular speakers.
You've obviously never heard the Fire HD.
Does it sound as good as reference speakers? No. Does it sound good? Yes. It is absolutely not garbage-sounding. I disagree that the number of drivers is irrelevant. It is not the sole factor in sound quality, and there is a point of diminishing returns, but in most cases, two drivers will sound better than one in a given form factor.
Big sound. Compact design. With Kindle Fire HD 8.9", we put stereo speakers on both sides of the display for a wide stereo sound-field similar to that of a home stereo, then tuned them to better reproduce low notes. The result - deeper bass in your music, loud, rumbling movie soundtracks, and room-filling stereo sound without distortion, even at higher volumes.
Which only shows how stupid the whole 'HD' thing is.
1280x720 on a 50" screen = HD
1024x600 on a 8" screen = not HD
Guess which one will look sharper? Doesn't matter, apparently.
The 'HD' term made a little bit of sense when most every TV was between 27" and 50". The fact that the tech industry went on to use the phrase for every screen from 4" to 100" is to biggest bunch of crap they've pulled in quite some time. And this is an industry FULL of crap advertising to begin with.
I just would have thought that they would have waited to get the facts right...
Standards bodies can't be trusted anymore, they're not impartial. I am.
Yep, exactly this, but we live in label-land, where labels are what matters, not the concepts behind them. You could be 1 pixel off and therefore it wouldn't be HD, and since people judge based on labels only, a viewing 1 pixel fewer would be *hugely* inferior, since it's not "HD". Silly, really.
Well exactly, stereo speakers consists of a pair of speakers, both by definition and by the plural 's'. Dual stereo speakers would be 2 pair of speakers, ie 4 in total. Counting the drivers is more than ridiculous, especially since the sound is pretty much guaranteed to be garbage compared to regular speakers.
A concept that was used inaccurately. The app store is not a loss leader. They plan to expand it and make it much more profitable. Just because it isn't the most profitable part of their business, doesn't mean its just there for hardware. It brings value in and of itself. No loss, no loss leader. Plain and simple.It's a concept, stop parsing the words, which are a label. It's just a concept.
This all started out when over a discussion of the difference in business models between Amazon/Google/B&N and Apple. You posited that Apple wants to make a killing on everything they do, when in fact that is not true, their major source of revenue is hardware, everything else is there to create value in their hardware. The article link I provided even stated they make 1% from the App Store, which is hardly a "killing" as you suggest, it's (as the article states) merely a profitable "loss leader." The concept remains true.
Stereo does not equal two speakers. Stereo is the illusion of directionality of sound: Stereophonic = Greek for solid + sound. You can create stereo with two or more speakers. A 5.1 setup is still stereo.
Yes, iPad has stereo speakers. 5th iPad may change their location, but they are already stereo anyway.
I completely agree - the sound really is quite good for a 7" tablet - but it is most assuredly not as good as they claim. Well, unless you're used to a Bose home stereo. In that case, the Fire HD is likely superior.Let's look at the copy:
...
No, just no!
Your right I haven't, but I have worked as a sound engineer. I haven't said that the amount of drivers is irrelevant, I'm sure it's possible to improve what you can achieve with small speakers like this but, it's still going to be different degrees of horrible.
I tried to show that they were stretching the truth not only in regards to the iPad but their own device as well. If they said "dual driver stereo speakers" fine, but they did not. You would not need reference speakers, just decent regular speakers in cabinets. Let's look at the copy:
No, just no!
Oops, you're right. Here's another link to the mini version.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/feature.ht...d_t=201&pf_rd_p=1409302382&pf_rd_i=B0083PWAPW
Honest mistake? Maybe they should have bought one and checked before they posted. That's not an honest mistake. That's publishing without a single shred of fact checking, which is simply ignorance.
Amazon is not only wrong with the speakers. 1024x768 is HD resolution and iTunes offers HD movies, even 1080p.
If audio is amplified in mono (one speaker), then the source sounds are mixed differently to stereo. So it doesn't matter how far apart they are, the actual audio itself will sound different regardless.
But really, stereo speakers on a tablet or phone are useless. Stereo works by playing varied sounds into each ear. If you have only two tiny speakers, right next to each other, firing sound from the same direction--you will hear mono anyway.
It's not an illusion, the directionality is achieved by the speaker placement. The most common stereo signal is 2 channels, requiring 2 speakers, and in this case we know that there is no 5.1 involved.
How is it not an illusion? If sound sounds like it is coming from right in front of you, but you have one speaker to your left and one to your right, there is no physical thing that is going on to create sound coming from the center. It is you brain interpreting level and time differences from those two sources, creating the illusion that sound is coming from in front of you.
In this case I'd hardly call the two speakers stereo as they are too close together to create any appreciable time or level difference - apart from maybe the very highs, effectively sounding like a single source.
The 2 and 5.1 examples were just an example as to the fact that both can be stereo.
Dual mono does not mean two speakers playing one feed. And in fact, it is usually used in recording contexts rather than in playback.
If it is necessary, such stereo widening or 3D can be achieved through software.
While you're correct about recording, I'd argue that the term is appropriate for mono playback over two speakers. If you don't like the term, what would you suggest as an alternative?
Not in landscape mode. And positioning the speakers as far apart as possible is always going to be superior to processing to try and make it seem wider.