i got 20 20 . I can't notice it on a iPad 2. Not sure about the mini. But wouldn't the pixels be smaller??9.7 vs 7.9??Huh? There is nothing wrong with the current HD standards. I think you are talking about viewing distance. The iPad 2 and Mini the pixels are very noticeable at a foot viewing distance.
Not true. There are two closely-grouped speakers on the top and also two on the bottom (left and right, in portrait mode). The sound is excellent, and stereo is easily perceived when watching movies.They're both on the bottom! And they aren't even on opposite ends of the bottom, they're really close to each other in the middle, on either side of the Lightning port! That's terrible stereo.
But I bet the Kindle Fires do the same thing.
Wow, Amazon. Also, all iTunes content (besides apps, of course) works on Mac and Windows. "Select Apple products"... yeah right.Most items on Amazon's comparison list are technically correct, but this one seems a tad misleading a best.
Interoperability
Kindle Fire:
Buy once, enjoy everywhere.
We make it easy to access your
content on other devices,
including iPad, iPhone,
Android phones & tablets,
BlackBerry, Windows phones,
Roku, TiVo, internet-ready TVs,
and through your web browser
iPad Mini:
Limited: Most Apple content can only be
used on select Apple products.
I've never noticed an issue at all with the USB port in mine (maybe they fixed it since yours was made? dunno), and while I might likely agree about the bezel, I keep mine in a (slim) case so it sleeps when I close it, and hence I don't notice any bezel issues.
Again, I'm not doubting the superior build quality of the iPad mini. I'm just doubting it's worth it for a device that - like any other device of that size range - you're going to want to replace in half a year. $429 vs $250 for 32GB WiFi is a huge amount to pay for a better port. And, really, I am not at all convinced that Lightning is worth it - it's a great port, but it's a damned expensive one, and you will end up not being able to charge your device at some point when you easily could have with micro USB.
$299.
I agree about the bloatware, but after having lost my Android cherry on the Nexus 7, the Nexus 4 is actually looking compelling to me when it's time to upgrade. However, since that's not for another year, we'll see at that point. The Nexus products are bloatware-free, and the specs they have seem, to me, to be very germane to their use.
Even more to the point, most iTunes music, in particular, is DRM-free and works on any device that can play the format (so, pretty much any device that can play digital music).Wow, Amazon. Also, all iTunes content (besides apps, of course) works on Mac and Windows. "Select Apple products"... yeah right.
So now theres two physical speaker grills in the case, as opposed to one?
The ipad 3 still had stereo didn't it ? Whats the change ?
It turns out the iphone 5 has two grills on the bottom as well. Does that mean it has stereo? No.
If the iPad mini had stereo, Apple would have advertised it as such. According to Apples own tech specs, Amazon is correct.
There is something wrong when you can put the same number of pixels in a 4" Android phone as in a 70" TV and give them both the same name.
At that point the term has lost all meaning.
This, I grant, but at least in my case, it's never seemed too cheap. Yes, it was a $199 device, but my standards for a $199 device aren't high, and it has completely blown me away with what it can do and how fast it can do it. Now, months later, I can get 16GB for the same price.My Nexus 7 was cheap and it loves reminding me of that.
How can anyone tell if it's stereo if both speakers are right next to each other?
Seriously, that's about the worst "stereo" speaker layout I've ever seen. So if you're watching a movie (in landscape, obviously) it's "stereo" but all the sounds are still going to come from the right side of the screen, since that's where both speakers are?
I'm still skeptical.
I still don't get it. $429 million is still profit. Sure they have other sources of profit that's much bigger, but it doesn't make it a loss leader. Kind of a very loose ie inaccurate use of the term loss leader.You're being obtuse now. Here's doing your work for you: http://www.fastcompany.com/1663012/apples-app-store-has-netted-429-million-loss-leader
i got 20 20 . I can't notice it on a iPad 2. Not sure about the mini. But wouldn't the pixels be smaller??9.7 vs 7.9??
An ipad 4 came out too... I don't think the ipad mini was intended for owners of current iPads..
Serious question regarding the checklist, not baiting or trolling..
Cool to see about the stereo speakers, but what about a couple of the other items...
1) why can Amazon say they offer Movies and TV (with a PAID amazon prime subscription), yet they dismiss PAY movies and TV from the iTunes Store?
2) Is the iPad Mini (and iPad 2) really a low res display? I swore I watched 720p movies on my iPad 2. While they may have not been 720p exactly, I wouldn't have called it low res.
Is it just selective marketing on Amazons part?
No, the full-sized iPads, iPods, and iPhones have the weak mono speakers. The better speakers and expandable storage are the two features that Android devices have that I wish Apple devices had.
I still don't get it. $429 million is still profit. Sure they have other sources of profit that's much bigger, but it doesn't make it a loss leader. Kind of a very loose ie inaccurate use of the term loss leader.
I have to disagree on expandable storage. iCloud can for all intents and purposes, offer unlimited storage. It's a new (and better IMHO) paradigm and I'm all for the new and out with the old, including traditional file systems and all the complexity it brings. I should have access to all of my files and media content on any device, perfectly synced, wherever I am. Storing files on removable storage would be going backwards IMHO.
Also, what many people don't know, including rabid Android fans who think Google was being forward-thinking, is that Google originally did not want to offer expandable storage (and still don't) because of all the potential security issues and the confusing UI it presents. They were forced to support it in Android as a result of severe flash memory shortages due to Apple gobbling up the world's supply. There's a reason why Nexus 7 doesn't offer microSD, even on the original with its paltry 8 GBs.
I appreciate that Apple didn't mention this "feature" during the keynote, or in any promotional materials. Clearly they understand how worthless it is.
Sure, if you have room, put it in, it can't hurt anything.
But really, stereo speakers on a tablet or phone are useless. Stereo works by playing varied sounds into each ear. If you have only two tiny speakers, right next to each other, firing sound from the same direction--you will hear mono anyway.
This isn't a knock on Apple's implementation, it's a simple acoustic fact. Any manufacturer who includes it has no business claiming it as a "feature". It's simply a set of components. Perhaps it's superior on paper, but in practice, will sound no different than one larger speaker.
I have to disagree on expandable storage. iCloud can for all intents and purposes, offer unlimited storage. It's a new (and better IMHO) paradigm and I'm all for the new and out with the old, including traditional file systems and all the complexity it brings. I should have access to all of my files and media content on any device, perfectly synced, wherever I am. Storing files on removable storage would be going backwards IMHO.
I have a feeling 5th gen iPad will be stereo too.
Since movies are usually watched in landscape mode, those stereo speakers are quite useless unless you have two ears on one side of your head. Pretty much a waste. I'll be using headphones when I watch movies. Stereo speakers are merely a gimmick for tablets.![]()