Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I agree that "Pro" doesn't mean creative types and developers. However, to me "Pro" means it is capable of working with a wide range of potential work product. It means it can connect to whatever I need (both physically and virtually), it will open whatever file I use and can open the files anyone I work with uses (clients, customers, suppliers, vendors, etc.), and it will adapt as needed in the future. In this sense, iOS9 is not a "pro" OS, regardless of the screen size it is run on or how fast the processor benchmarks. The example given above is very apt - regardless of what field you are in, today you might still need to open a DVD. In such an event, even the retina Macbook with one port can connect a USB DVD-ROM. iOS has no contingency for this. Maybe iOS10 will be more Pro, but not today.
Agree. With the MBP, Pro actually means deluxe. With the Mac Pro, it does mean Pro. IPP should be the iPad Plus
 
You may be right about the what the OP meant, but if so it was very poorly worded and the 'tablets' are the only thing mentioned in that sentence. And to understand my point, it's getting old that when most folks on this forum see the word PRO they only think of creative types and developers.

While the Pencil is a nice feature of the iPP, the draw (pun intended) to the device is also the larger screen and better processing power. Combined with the IBM enterprise partnership, many of the PROS I mentioned could have a more productive way to go about their business.



See my IBM comment above. Even with the right apps, this device may not suit your workflow, but I'll bet many, more mobile users, will love what the iPP could do. A few workstations may still be needed for the seriously 'heavy lifting', but the iPP, combined with great softwear development, has much more potential than many people are giving it credit for.
Thats not remotely similar, iOS has multi-tasked since version 4. Side by side makes sense because of the screen. Features and not remotely comparable to the fundamental way you interact with the entire operating system. OS X is not touch enabled it would be a horrible experience, end of story.

iOS and its apps will continue to evolve, but it will never become a desktop experience and neither should it. Its about the correct experience, not a device that fails to do anything properly.

No. It can do, without breaking iOS into something overly complex.

1. Full featured apps, so the app on the iPad is the same as the app on the desktop
2. File system. Not needed, it just needs to be app present, so you can add/remove folders. Get a file from USB or elsewhere, drag it to the app where you can store in your user created folder

These two features would allow you to use an iPad as if it was a full OS, but iOS would still have the same look and feel. Split View, pencil, keyboard and better BT pairing to any available device would make it a laptop replacement when required, but still retain the tablet experience. BT mouse would be huge. Holiday, flight, business trip, you have a full yet portable laptop. Back home, use it for consumption as the MBP is nicer .

It doesnt have to be a Surface, it doesnt have to have OSX. It has to have the apps and functions, no more is needed
 
How do you define win? They are two fundamentally different philosophies as to what a computers should be going forward. Some people prefer MS's philosophy (lots of them visit MacRumors to tell us so), but I certainly prefers Apple's philosophy. You see, I want iPad Pro to sell 50M units through next year because then Adobe will want to get onto it with PS proper, and the only way on is by building PS for iPad with touch not being an afterthought, but being fundamental. That's how you push things forward. Not by selling on a feature checklist and dragging the past (the desktop) forward. The computer user needs to cut ties with the past and move forward and that's how it happens. Not by riding the fence as MS is doing. And the desktop OS stays around but becomes ever more technical and esoteric. And yes, powerful, but not used by most people. This is what Apple understands and why they are holding strong.
One is a computer and a tablet, the other is a tablet. The OS on each forces that to be the case.

As one said earlier, a car or a motorcycle
 
Thats not remotely similar, iOS has multi-tasked since version 4. Side by side makes sense because of the screen. Features and not remotely comparable to the fundamental way you interact with the entire operating system. OS X is not touch enabled it would be a horrible experience, end of story.

iOS and its apps will continue to evolve, but it will never become a desktop experience and neither should it. Its about the correct experience, not a device that fails to do anything properly.

What is a desktop experience?

Computing wise , its the apps and the functions, its not the table and comfy chair
 
The desktop isn't the past, windows 10 is quite intuitive to use on a tablet in terms of transitioning the desktop to it. I beg to differ, iOS is what is stuck in the past, it's overly simplistic for no good reason. Microsoft is trying very hard to move forward, doing things like uniting tablets and laptops, desktop and tablet functionality, even pushing to allow your smartphone to be your entire computer. FYI iOS has a "desktop" as well, but what sucks about it is the lack of file system, and of course the lack of complex programs versus watered down apps. A convergence of desktop and mobile is obvious, but Apple seems like the only one fighting it hard.

I must say I was sorely disappointed when Windows RT came out, that's when Microsoft tried to out ipad the ipad, not realizing that they did not need to dumb themselves down to the level of iOS. RT's death was obvious the instant it was released and thank God, my functionality would plummet if I lost Windows on my SP4 and had to go back to "apps".

The future is convergence, Apple knows it too, they just know their customers are ok with being milked until the last minute when they switch over. Very smart company which knows just how to corral their cattle.
Good post.

But iOS isn't simplistic though, its just missing key features that aid usefulness. Some file system access, full apps as you say, access to USB, BT mouse. Not really a lot needed to be able to sit down and do what you can now do in Win 10 or OSX
 
I just got back from the Apple Store to try out the iPad Pro.

Errrrr..... I really don't get what all the fuss is about.

The Pencil. It doesn't feel great in the hand, it doesn't feel fantastic against the screen.
Tilt doesn't really add anything. Not that impressed really.
The iPad is stupidly large and looks daft in with the keyboard.
The keyboard wasn't as bad as I thought it would be. Actually feels better than the MacBook.

Apple Watch section was deserted and I steered clear of it just in case I'd be mobbed by retail staff.

Had a play with the SurfaceBook. Pretty damn fine indeed but not sure I'd buy one over a Surface Pro. I can't justify the extra cash. Maybe version 2.
Looks like I'll be upgrading to a Surface Pro 4 for Crimbo.
 
From an artists perspective:
I have a sp4, its a buggy experience, but is powerful enough for all my professiomal art needs. The pen is lacking, imo, but it's good enough for illustration work.

My IPP has a slight advantage in the pen, but lacks completely in the software end. iOS is too limited for me. I Really wish Apple would do a OS X tablet. These things are powerful enough for my needs, but I need photoshop at a minimum.

IPP is a great toy sketch pad, but I am still chained to Windows and cintiq companion 2 for now, its pen is unmatched, and it's the only option that fills my professional needs, despite its shortcomings as a tablet.

I'm returning the sp4, and keeping the IPP, I still work on the companion, but for fun personal sketching or painting I prefer the IPP

One day I hope to have one tablet for all my professional needs. Maybe companion 3 will do it. There pen is still significantly better than apple's. If only the battery life didn't suck so bad.......
 
Good post.

But iOS isn't simplistic though, its just missing key features that aid usefulness. Some file system access, full apps as you say, access to USB, BT mouse. Not really a lot needed to be able to sit down and do what you can now do in Win 10 or OSX

Yes, on some levels I agree with you. But that definition would have to include the ability to run full OSx apps, and I suppose windows emulation as well. File system and mouse are no brainers and those omissions are quite perplexing. That's the frustrating part about it, there is nothing keeping Apple from doing this. Maybe it makes more sense to say iOS is simplistic in it's current form. The necessity of such simplicity has passed us with the maturation of hardware.
 
I don't personally know anyone who actually owns full Photoshop. Not Photoshop Elements but the full program.

Adobe estimates 6 million Creative Cloud subscribers by end of year. That is $50 a month and gives you all of their full programs. I love the subscription model, but most hate it. I just love it because I use so many of their apps and used to have to buy multiple $600 updates for different packages back in the day.

I know TONS of people with full Adobe programs, but that is the circle I run in (film, design, and publishing). Of the dozens of people I've worked with, none of them were subscribers, so they don't count towards that 6 million. Most people are still clinging to their older versions to avoid the subscription.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hamado and navaira



Apple released the iPad Pro last week as a direct competitor to Microsoft's new Surface Pro 4. The high-end tablets are primarily targeted at creative professionals, with the companion Apple Pencil and Surface Pen available as precise input tools to complement your finger.

iMore has shared a new video that compares sketching with the Apple Pencil on the iPad Pro to the Surface Pen on Microsoft's new Surface Book, which has equivalent display technology as the Surface Pro 4.


Editor Serenity Caldwell found the Surface Pen to be "about as responsive" as the Apple Pencil, but said Microsoft's stylus pressure was slightly harder to control and had more trouble at writing small type.

The Verge has created a similar video that provides more of a high-level comparison of the iPad Pro vs. Surface Pro 4, while also touching upon the Apple Pencil and Surface Pen and showing some limited usage of each accessory.

Editor Jacob Kastrenakes called the Apple Pencil "one of the best" he has ever used, adding that the Surface Pen "can be a little less natural" but benefits from having a hardware eraser -- which the Apple Pencil doesn't have.


Kastrenakes said the Apple Pencil is "really responsive" and has "amazing palm rejection," and he offered similar accolades for the Surface Pen, although quality will vary from app to app on both the iPad Pro and Surface Pro 4.

Apple Pencil online orders began to see movement earlier this week, while Apple retail stores started receiving more reliable Apple Pencil shipments on Tuesday for in-store purchase. The accessory is available to ship in 4-5 weeks online.

Article Link: iPad Pro and Apple Pencil Compared to Surface Pro 4 and Surface Pen



Can't see a thing, her hand is in the way, nice video of the back of someone's hand.
 
Whoever shot that video should have their video camera taken from them and destroyed. You do NOT shoot a left-handed person from behind their left shoulder if you're trying to capture how a stylus is working and reacting to a surface. I found the video useless and frustrating because HER HAND WAS IN THE WAY!!!!

Really??? Who would shoot such a video???

Macrumors should be embarrassed to even post the video...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hamado
I don't know why people keep trying to compare ipad pro and surface pro 4. They are two very different tablets with two very different purposes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
The iMore video is an annoying joke! They used a left handed person and shot the video from over her left shoulder. How are we to judge latency when we actually can't anything!?
 
Last edited:
If you could only pick one (JUST ONE) laptop from these two, which would it be?

Gateway 15.6 - Intel Celeron 1005M, 4GB RAM 500GB HDD, 1.9GHz DUAL CORE

OR

Surface Pro 4

Which one would it be and why?
 
I have the Surface Pro 4 setup. Late this afternoon I stopped at Best Buy and bought the iPP Pencil and Keyboard for my bother. Tonight we've been comparing them just for fun.

They are different as expected, plus I've never been one with a desire to pick a winner. Being an Apple forum that's pointless anyway. Suffice to say that each of them have very strong merits.
 
I can't wait until I'm able to use a touch screen to adjust my faders and pans in Logic Pro X. Until then, my ol' Magic Mouse will have to suffice.
 
Apple made a big mistake by not allowing the iPad Pro to run a full version of Mac OS X. The fact that I can't draw directly in Illustrator or Photoshop pretty much makes the Pro a no-go. Pros don't use iOS no matter how much Apple would like you to believe otherwise. Content creators are not using tablets. Apple really missed their target here. I have to wonder where Cook is getting his advice.

You do know iPad Pro is a tablet, right?
 
I just got back from the Apple Store to try out the iPad Pro.

Errrrr..... I really don't get what all the fuss is about.

The Pencil. It doesn't feel great in the hand, it doesn't feel fantastic against the screen.
Tilt doesn't really add anything. Not that impressed really.
The iPad is stupidly large and looks daft in with the keyboard.
The keyboard wasn't as bad as I thought it would be. Actually feels better than the MacBook.

Apple Watch section was deserted and I steered clear of it just in case I'd be mobbed by retail staff.

Had a play with the SurfaceBook. Pretty damn fine indeed but not sure I'd buy one over a Surface Pro. I can't justify the extra cash. Maybe version 2.
Looks like I'll be upgrading to a Surface Pro 4 for Crimbo.


Yes, we know that you prefer your low sensitivity, high latency, no tilt sensor Surface.
 
If you could only pick one (JUST ONE) laptop from these two, which would it be?

Gateway 15.6 - Intel Celeron 1005M, 4GB RAM 500GB HDD, 1.9GHz DUAL CORE

OR

Surface Pro 4

Which one would it be and why?

macbook air or Pro. Its really a universe of difference. I worked with both systems, now I prefer all Macs and iOS only. You are saving yourself tremendous amount of time and efficiency
 
  • Like
Reactions: macfoxpro
Yes, we know that you prefer your low sensitivity, high latency, no tilt sensor Surface.

Having to choose a separate brush to do shading is definitely less elegant than tilt. It's kind of live having to choose a separate tool to erase anything.

Latency is a non-issue now... Both solutions are great and both solutions vary by app. A few days ago Intel unlocked a new feature of Skylake processors that boosted general performance by as much as 10% and cut the pen/touch latency in half! The side by side videos that exist did not have this update. It was a crazy difference.
 
Good post.

But iOS isn't simplistic though, its just missing key features that aid usefulness. Some file system access, full apps as you say, access to USB, BT mouse. Not really a lot needed to be able to sit down and do what you can now do in Win 10 or OSX
Maybe Photoshop? - great pencil - no App!
 
Adobe estimates 6 million Creative Cloud subscribers by end of year. That is $50 a month and gives you all of their full programs. I love the subscription model, but most hate it. I just love it because I use so many of their apps and used to have to buy multiple $600 updates for different packages back in the day.

I know TONS of people with full Adobe programs, but that is the circle I run in (film, design, and publishing). Of the dozens of people I've worked with, none of them were subscribers, so they don't count towards that 6 million. Most people are still clinging to their older versions to avoid the subscription.

As you said, we know different types of people. I used to have a boot leg copy of Photoshop when I use to use Windows machine at home. I now run Pixelmator which cost me maybe $25. I does everything for ME that I did with photoshop and also works on the iPad at $5. So for me, makes way more sense. Everyone else I know and work with only uses Photos on their phone to edit pictures.

It depends what you do. In my daytime job as an engineer I run 3D solid modeling, knowledge based engineering and Finite element analysis. For these, the Surface Pro 4 doesn't have the horsepower nor video card required to run them efficently. as a workstation, it's a toy, much like some of you view the iPad Pro a toy.
 
I see both as rather ****, I'd rather a Macbook 12 with a 360o hinge, Skylake and a Touch Screen.

Mac users can live in denial all they like but people have spoken and they want touch screens on their Laptops.
 
I see both as rather ****, I'd rather a Macbook 12 with a 360o hinge, Skylake and a Touch Screen.

Mac users can live in denial all they like but people have spoken and they want touch screens on their Laptops.

Why do you think OS X would be good with a touch screen?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.