How so when it's Intel processors not ARM?Isn't the new MacBook, just an iPad that runs OS X all be it with an attached keyboard?
How so when it's Intel processors not ARM?Isn't the new MacBook, just an iPad that runs OS X all be it with an attached keyboard?
Why would you be hoping for that when everything Apple has said over the years points to them being against touch screen laptops. For me the new MacBook is the biggest indicator that they have no intention of making a touch screen Mac.I was hoping the ipad pro would be a touchscreen laptop. In other words, I was hoping the ipad pro could do everything a laptop could. I don't care about the OS as long as the capability is there.
But the ecosystem is just as important as the OS if not more. Apple could easily make a fully functional touch OS, but what applications will it run? Non touch OS X applications? Neutered iOS apps? It's not likely OS X application developers will be eager to redesign all their applications for touch interface without some serious financial motivation (money over time). The main reason developers were eager to create new versions of their applications for iOS was because iPhones and iPads were popular AND the apps were simple. Where will their motivation be to redesign their full desktop applications for a device that has no proven mass market demand? As far as I can see, the only way we'll ever see a laptop level tablet from Apple is if iOS and its ecosystem grows in functionality over time. Or if there is a sudden boom in demand for pro tablet devices.
Yes, I think it's harder for them to keep big secrets now than before when they were still a rather small company. I remember the shock when they revealed OS X running on Intel machines though!
The new MacBook is essentially an iPad Pro for those who want OSX. OSX with touch input would be a subpar experience. This iPad Pro would be for those who prefer iOS. Don't see how anyone can complain when both bases would be covered.
You will be able to run OS X apps on iOS 10 with the iPad Pro. iOS 9.1 has a new icon, called OS X. You launch it, then you can install OS X apps for now. Apple wasn't able to integrate it in time for 9.x
Who's says Apple can't get it done? It's not that they can't do it it's that they don't believe in it.If Microsoft can get it done with the Surface why can't Apple? Oh that's right, Microsoft heavily invested in touch based OS's.
As a digital artist, I'm very interested in this iPad Pro running iOS as a digital sketchbook. But as a professional often on the go, I still need a solution for a standalone pen tablet running OS X for work applications. Right now there are simply no legit options for people in my situation. The Modbook company seems like they're on the brink of going under. Could go Windows and get a Cintiq Companion 2 or Surface Pro 3, but c'mon... I know Apple will never make their own OS X tablet, but what I really wish is for Apple to license OS X to established companies like Wacom who are willing to make these niche professional devices. Yes, OS X on a tablet is not ideal, but some people need it to make money, darn it!
Agreed. I was soooo hoping they would put OS X on it. IMHO that would really make it "pro"This blows! Means no Mac OS X.
Nevermind then, I won't be selling my Mac Pro and iMac with Retina 5K display.
NO. I would probably drop it.I'm really curious. Raise your hand if a 12.9 inch ipad is something you might want.
Ok that's a good point. I really don't want to wipe my fingers all over my MAC screen.The new MacBook is essentially an iPad Pro for those who want OSX. OSX with touch input would be a subpar experience. This iPad Pro would be for those who prefer iOS. Don't see how anyone can complain when both bases would be covered.
iOS with a true usb host and a more friendly way to access files between apps would probably be enough for me to replicate most laptop functions
Why are people moaning about it running iOS? If there's a feature or two you'd like in a Pro tablet (for example: true multitasking) why aren't you leaving comments like 'without true multitasking, I don't want it'.
If you want every feature of OS X, you need a laptop.
As a digital artist, I'm very interested in this iPad Pro running iOS as a digital sketchbook. But as a professional often on the go, I still need a solution for a standalone pen tablet running OS X for work applications. Right now there are simply no legit options for people in my situation. The Modbook company seems like they're on the brink of going under. Could go Windows and get a Cintiq Companion 2 or Surface Pro 3, but c'mon... I know Apple will never make their own OS X tablet, but what I really wish is for Apple to license OS X to established companies like Wacom who are willing to make these niche professional devices. Yes, OS X on a tablet is not ideal, but some people need it to make money, darn it!
Why....would people think an iPad, which is known as an iOS device, would just all of a sudden run OS X?
And it's better this way. When you try to have one operating system to run touchscreen and non-touch devices, you get the train wreck that is Windows 8.
i dont get it. The companion and sp3 are both excellent solutions. It took me 5 minutes to get Win 8.1 to do what i
needed. Neither will rival the ipad as a media device anytime soon--but isn't this a prefessional tool? How long are
you going to let apple frustrate your work?