Yes, "laptop replacements" are important.
We are all not so rich as to consider so many devices for different workflows. If I had one super-mobile tablet-sized machine that can do everything I want it to do, it is optimal, no matter how one might want to believe otherwise. It's just about the size and cost at that point.... and to a lesser degree, ecosystem.
Apple cornered themselves by insisting and standing behind the point that touch will never come to the Mac, and the iPad will never have MacOS. That's wrong. We can hate on Windows all you want, but I can get tablet-equivalent full PC machines with no compromises. They've worked hard on inclusiveness where Apple seems to want to keep them separate. Why? Because ... money?
(Now, granted, Microsoft isn't perfect, but they're at least trying. Windows mobile was a joke. But there's definitely a serious contender in the tablet space: Surface)
Apple hasn't invested into making their iOS world "power app" friendly, with perhaps the only notable exception of Office and now Photoshop, but even in those apps, there are compromises. I'm finding more and more that I don't want to invest into iPad and thus Apple ecosystem just because I'm constantly working around the power experience and not toward it. Nowadays I can get a Surface and what really am I sacrificing? Not a heck of a lot.
I still like iOS for games and timewaster and notification apps. Good job making IOS great for that, Apple.
No question that the processor power is good, but I really wonder if the processor is good enough to replace intel in a MacOS machine with all the instructions.
We are all not so rich as to consider so many devices for different workflows. If I had one super-mobile tablet-sized machine that can do everything I want it to do, it is optimal, no matter how one might want to believe otherwise. It's just about the size and cost at that point.... and to a lesser degree, ecosystem.
Apple cornered themselves by insisting and standing behind the point that touch will never come to the Mac, and the iPad will never have MacOS. That's wrong. We can hate on Windows all you want, but I can get tablet-equivalent full PC machines with no compromises. They've worked hard on inclusiveness where Apple seems to want to keep them separate. Why? Because ... money?
(Now, granted, Microsoft isn't perfect, but they're at least trying. Windows mobile was a joke. But there's definitely a serious contender in the tablet space: Surface)
Apple hasn't invested into making their iOS world "power app" friendly, with perhaps the only notable exception of Office and now Photoshop, but even in those apps, there are compromises. I'm finding more and more that I don't want to invest into iPad and thus Apple ecosystem just because I'm constantly working around the power experience and not toward it. Nowadays I can get a Surface and what really am I sacrificing? Not a heck of a lot.
I still like iOS for games and timewaster and notification apps. Good job making IOS great for that, Apple.
No question that the processor power is good, but I really wonder if the processor is good enough to replace intel in a MacOS machine with all the instructions.