on the one hand, i understand the concern that apple would add functionality only accessible by 3d touch, in the similar way that they seem to only be able to add an orange filter "night mode" to 64 bit devices, even though flux demonstrates that any device is easily able to handle such an operation.
(i know people will say its a question of devoting the programming resources to older hardware implementations, but the same problem could easily be applied to an upcoming iteration of iOS. just a purely fictional example with a heavily requested feature: they introduce a more robust file management system for iOS, but for whatever reason only make it only accessible via a force touch implementation.)
on the flip side, its really hard to advise on purchase decisions when they aren't based on any current need, and only on the speculative value of a given feature. iOS 10 is going to be introduced this summer; the march iPad will represent the latest hardware going into that introduction. which means you likely won't be missing out on any fundamental functionality in that release. its also a truism that when the following iPad hardware comes out in the fall or next sprint, it will have things that the existing versions lack. even if you got 3d touch this round, there'd be something else the next round that you'll have to live without.
so basically, if you really crave 3d touch, wait it out. if you see the value of whats currently (or imminently) offered, you can make a purchase sooner.
Exactly. Even if 3D Touch was included in this release, there will always be new features that will be available next release. So there is always features that you will be living without in every release. So you might as well buy the latest release and be happy with your awesome purchase. Or you can always wait for the next new release and miss out. Choices.
