And neither Samsung nor Apple are in the right.8 years ago my Samsung TV broke down. I wanted to buy a different motherboard, but it turned out to be impossible, because all electronics are calibrated with the screen. It's the same here.
And neither Samsung nor Apple are in the right.8 years ago my Samsung TV broke down. I wanted to buy a different motherboard, but it turned out to be impossible, because all electronics are calibrated with the screen. It's the same here.
Well for your info Asurion own UbreakIfix and Verizon, Sprint, ATT, etc are partner with Asurion for insurance repair claims. They don't use cheap parts.According to iFixit, “putting an authentication check on a simple camera swap poisons the iPhone repair and resale market.”
Does it really? Personally, I want to know if an iPhone has a cheap aftermarket part. Especially if it’s been repaired by the likes of Asurion et al.
The problem is the motherboard is now tied to this unique screen, even if you have a brand new board from Samsung, you still cannot repair your own TV.8 years ago my Samsung TV broke down. I wanted to buy a different motherboard, but it turned out to be impossible, because all electronics are calibrated with the screen. It's the same here.
They said variant of T2:They didn't say it was T2.
T2 is a chip in the Mac, not in the iPhone and not in any of the peripherals themselves. Maybe they were referring to the underlying secure enclave and other hardare security strategies? Hard to know. They‘re basing their understanding on YouTube, so who knows what’s in their head.This is essentially a variant of T2 security on the camera module and the motherboard.
I hate to question your youtuber’s genius, but I think neither you nor they have any idea how the technology here works.
Let me give you an analogy. When we finally develop the technology to do full eye transplants, we won’t be able to just swap eyes between people and expect them to work. Not because of some profit mongering god, but because our eyes are part of a sophisticated system. Every eye is different, and it operates in careful coordination with our brains. I wouldn’t be surprised if we weren’t even able to form an image with someone else’s eyes, let alone coordinate them with our ears and spatial awareness to navigate a room. When we start swapping eyes between people, I’m pretty sure we won’t let people leave the hospital before they’ve spent time adapting to their new components.
Every lens element has different characteristics, every lens assembly has different characteristics, every sensor/lens sub module has different characteristics, every focus and stabilization mechanism has different characteristics, every multi-camera assembly has different characteristics, and every camera-lidar assembly has different characteristics and all of those characteristics change with age and use. To get the most out of that package, its entirely possible that Apple is calibrating the heck out of that hardware set and then tracking those changes with age. When you abruptly swap the underlying hardware, the system may not perform as the user expects. The service requirements may simply be Apple’s way of ensuring that their authorized repair techs follow the proper procedure in mating the hardware together to ensure the user experience is consistent with Apple’s standards.
I’m not saying with certainty that this is why Apple’s procedure is what it is, I’m just saying there are alternative explanations in addition to privacy, security and greed.
Also, there is no T2 in an iPhone.
I agree it’s best to allow the consumer options, including self repair! However, we have to also acknowledge there is bad players in the repair world, some willing to buy stolen iCloud locked/Network locked phones to use those components, or use cheap subpar fake parts yet charging for real Apple parts to their customer because the customer can’t verify... how many non-tech people use independent repair shops because an Apple store isn’t cheap or convenient, now these people have a poor experience.I love Apple, but I really hope right-to-repair laws are put into place soon so they finally change this anti-consumer behaviour. In the US I believe some states have them, but I think the EU will be the first to adopt one those laws and apply it in every member-state.
Imagine Joe's auto lube haus, stand alone Radio Shack franchise, and crab emporium of Kent County Delaware decided he thought it was a good idea to replace the wheel motors on your $70k Tesla with ones he took from an old Maytag electric dryer and not calibrate it to factory standards.Imagine your brand new $70k Tesla has its tires remotely locked by Elon Musk, and swapping the tires is going to cost you an arm and a leg.
In previous phone repairs I have bought the Module of what needs repairing, and used the set of appleI don’t think “I want to replace a faulty custom built miniature lidar scanner, that was built into one of the most densely packed, precisely engineered mobile computing devices to ever exist” falls within what one could reasonably assume they’d do themselves, with a basic set of tools...
I’m missing the point of ‘iFixIt’ completely. Who are they? Why is this of interest to 99% of buyers? Most people I imagine couldn’t give a toss about whether their iPhone components are glued together or a camera module can’t be repaired.
You clearly have no idea how a modern digital imager works... Do you think there’s a little mini chemical lab in there? You don’t think it’s possible to put any logic on an image sensor? You think the ISP is neatly captured in exactly one place in hardware?You're confusing the CMOS sensor with data processing. There is no data processing on the camera module. There's a reason why Apple says the Image Signal Processor is built into A14 which allows computational photography.
They also said 'essentially' and I am well aware that T2 is a Mac specific chip. I am assuming they were referring to this article wrt t2, and are drawing a comparison to this scenario with the iPhoneThey said variant of T2:
T2 is a chip in the Mac, not in the iPhone and not in any of the peripherals themselves. Maybe they were referring to the underlying secure enclave and other hardare security strategies? Hard to know. They‘re basing their understanding on YouTube, so who knows what’s in their head.
You clearly have no idea how a modern digital imager works... Do you think there’s a little mini chemical lab in there? You don’t think it’s possible to put any logic on an image sensor? You think the ISP is neatly captured in exactly one place in hardware?
I don’t have any inside knowledge as to how the Apple solution itself works, maybe you do, but your statements would be wrong about every other digital camera I’ve ever seen since they moved the A/Ds on chip.
And if the module is so dumb, then how can the phone reject it?
But the irony is that the more you argue that the module iself is stupid, the more you’re arguing in favor of my original point which is that it is quite possible (and you’re actually saying it is necessary) that the critical calibration data of the camera isn’t carried with the module itself and thus needs to be coordinated with the ISP that it finds itself attached to.
Technically Apple is doing the same thing as the 3rd parties. Their only advantage is that they holds the encryption keys to the hardware's software locks.I agree it’s best to allow the consumer options, including self repair! However, we have to also acknowledge there is bad players in the repair world, some willing to buy stolen iCloud locked/Network locked phones to use those components, or use cheap subpar fake parts yet charging for real Apple parts to their customer because the customer can’t verify... how many non-tech people use independent repair shops because an Apple store isn’t cheap or convenient, now these people have a poor experience.
I wonder if this is similar for high end Samsung or huawei phones?!?
I know who they are. I’m not a fan of their work.Well for your info Asurion own UbreakIfix and Verizon, Sprint, ATT, etc are partner with Asurion for insurance repair claims. They don't use cheap parts.
well that's that then; there is no need to worry about any of this. There are zero iPhones needing repair in the world and so no need for right to repair legislation, no need for AppleCare or technician training or repair centres, approved 3rd party service centres. If they never fail or need to repiar how can they become even more reliable every year?iFixIt is making a mountain out of a molehill. I have owned every model of iPhone except the iPhone 4. I have never needed to perform a repair on a single one.
My OG iPhone had a faulty touchscreen and was replaced under warranty at about 4 months old. I had a similar issue with my iPhone 6 after about 2 months. I attribute both of these issues to initial production of an entirely new device design (I always purchase on launch day). Apple’s customer service was impeccable in both situations.
Aside from these two ‘infant mortalities’ which didn’t require a repair, I have never needed to fix anything on an iPhone or even replace a battery. For the vast majority of iPhone users, repair is a hypothetical situation.
iPhones are crazy reliable devices and keep getting more reliable every year.
What are the chances this comment is related to the article in any way?What are the chances of a cheap 3rd party replacement camera having embedded malware/remote access etc?
Yes, people never drop their phones and I'm just imagining going to work everyday and replacing 10+ iPhone screens.iFixIt is making a mountain out of a molehill. I have owned every model of iPhone except the iPhone 4. I have never needed to perform a repair on a single one.
My OG iPhone had a faulty touchscreen and was replaced under warranty at about 4 months old. I had a similar issue with my iPhone 6 after about 2 months. I attribute both of these issues to initial production of an entirely new device design (I always purchase on launch day). Apple’s customer service was impeccable in both situations.
Aside from these two ‘infant mortalities’ which didn’t require a repair, I have never needed to fix anything on an iPhone or even replace a battery. For the vast majority of iPhone users, repair is a hypothetical situation.
iPhones are crazy reliable devices and keep getting more reliable every year.
Note the use of tweezers... Enormous was far more hyperbolic than microscopic.I was responding to someone calling them microscopic. That said, compare this:
to this:![]()
iPhone XS Rear-Facing Cameras Replacement
Use this guide to remove and replace the rear cameras in the iPhone XS. The rear camera assembly consists of two individual modules: one wide-angle...www.ifixit.com
![]()
iPhone SE Rear Facing Camera Replacement
Use this guide to replace a broken or non-functioning main camera in your iPhone SE. The camera is not compatible with an iPhone 5s part.www.ifixit.com
Enormous may be hyperbole, but so was microscopic.
There is no need to acknowledge it as replacing the original cameras back in the original phone returns function again.I don’t have the slightest interest in some drooling mall kiosk “technician” “repairing” my iPhone. Cameras on phones and iPad/Macs absolutely ARE a security issue, and I personally don’t trust anyone but Apple to work on security related items on my gear.
That’s entirely aside from the fact that “Ifixit” made NO effort to acknowledge that their “procedures” in the “test” may be the root cause of the “issues” they ”discovered” when they tried to swap cameras among devices. Having seen their “technicians” at work on their videos, I would not be the least bit surprised if they buggered the device up themselves.
Sorry, are you disagreeing with me or agreeing with me? You stated two facts that seem to miss the point of what I was saying...1. Same as iphone's camera module, Eyes are mass manufactured.
2. Serializing a part and ties it to a cloud-based authentication system work pretty much the same way, locking people from performing repair.